Can you stop making comments about history, as your knowledge about history is really pathetic. it is a insult to everybody. Has not anyone told you about this before? I reckon that everybody seems too polite to tell you this to your face. but this time i am the "ass-hole" to let you know the truth.
"還5000年呢。國外曆史學家還沒證明夏朝(2000多年)存在過"
is this your comment?
"風吹吹" Can you do everybody a bloody favour?
所有跟帖:
•
I support this conclusion.
-天外飛磚-
♀
(63 bytes)
()
02/19/2009 postreply
02:00:25
•
i hope I could stick something in his mouth though
-豬頭肉-
♂
(727 bytes)
()
02/19/2009 postreply
02:29:05
•
Show us ur hard evidence about a "Shang" dynasty's existance
-天外飛磚-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
02/19/2009 postreply
02:34:01
•
你的 "Shang" dynasty 意思是商朝, right?
-豬頭肉-
♂
(398 bytes)
()
02/19/2009 postreply
03:00:20
•
古曆史有夏朝的記載?你是說類似那些東方朔的所謂曆史記載?
-天外飛磚-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
02/19/2009 postreply
03:35:50
•
古代文明的基本定義是:文字,城市和金屬冶煉
-大牛哥-
♂
(190 bytes)
()
02/19/2009 postreply
04:05:15
•
yep, it is real alright :))
-null_pointer-
♂
(93 bytes)
()
02/19/2009 postreply
16:37:10
•
是啊,言論自由。而且說出來才知道他的一些觀點證據很荒謬可笑
-dq88-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
02/19/2009 postreply
02:16:30
•
如果他想說的那個道理,理論才湊活,具體數據時間錯了,就饒了他吧
-絕不浪費青春-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
02/19/2009 postreply
02:20:35
•
我曾經轉過一篇學術性文章證明他的觀點...那..你有什麽證據呢?
-大牛哥-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
02/19/2009 postreply
02:40:40