Chinese law?

來源: wal-mart 2004-03-25 12:10:54 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (845 bytes)
Clearly, this law111 has no knowledge of China's family law, which provides that children have duties to support their elder parents. Please note the complicated nexus between laws, cultrues and traditions. China has a long tradition that parents raise children for later support purposes. The law-makers and enforcers cannot blind their eyes to this existing custom in the society, esp. where the goverment at the current stage is incapable of bearing the burden of supporting senior citizens through establishing a nationwide social security system.
Besides the issues of jurisdiction and conflict of laws, it rests with the court's discretion to entertain equity in order to resolve the dispute between two parties. It will be a tough judgment because the complainant did not fullfil her duties at law to foster her minor child either.

所有跟帖: 

回複:Chinese law? -law111- 給 law111 發送悄悄話 (873 bytes) () 03/25/2004 postreply 12:24:35

回複:回複:Chinese law? -wal-mart- 給 wal-mart 發送悄悄話 (768 bytes) () 03/25/2004 postreply 15:26:52

回複:回複:回複:Chinese law? -law111- 給 law111 發送悄悄話 (1230 bytes) () 03/25/2004 postreply 15:52:55

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”