生活在彼岸-----耶魯被司法部判非法歧視亞裔和白人學生

(因為有更多的自由，可以讓思想和文字放飛，來https://t.me/SylviaCA 生活在彼岸電報公號吧……等你哦！)

 

幸福來的太突然！

在加州的各位華裔還在辛辛苦苦的設計參與組織一個又一個汽車遊行，反對即將到來的種族歧視法案Prop16的時候，就在2020年8月13日，美國司法部高調官宣，判決耶魯大學在本科招生的過程中，非法歧視亞裔和白人，違反聯邦民權法。

司法部不允許耶魯大學繼續用族裔和國籍（National Origin）作為錄取因素，決定2020-2021年的新生錄取。如果耶魯繼續使用族裔和國籍作為未來錄取因素，必須向司法部提交預案，證明其計劃是已經根據法律縮小範圍，並必須提交使用族裔因素錄取的截止日期。

 

為了讓幸福更真實些，必須看看司法部官網鏈接。https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-finds-yale-illegally-discriminates-against-asians-and-whites-undergraduate

為了讓讀者和朋友的幸福更持久些，原文照貼，每一個字每一個字的品味吧！

這次的題目是“非法歧視亞裔和白人”，筆者堅信從此後要找回自立自強的保守派宗旨，亞裔將更多次的排在白人的前麵，引導白人中的保守派把保守派的普世價值找回來。如果亞裔做的好，開始堅定而自信的努力，將有可能成為未來美國社會的領導之一。

目前還不必盲目樂觀，亞裔這次是被推到前麵做盾牌、做先鋒。亞裔天生的特質是移民、少數族裔、弱勢群體、語言劣勢以及政治無勢等等，而且還能在克服如此多障礙之後，仍然取得在美國社會的成就，這是亞裔的勝利。

作為一個族裔用努力換來值得所有人必須敬佩的成就，必須承認的事實。 Recognition  and Respect .  亞裔作為族裔未來將繼續為這兩個R做抗爭和努力。維護保守主義的普世價值也是亞裔的責任，從此後，必須擔起道義的大旗，並用自己的行動聲張自己的正義。

從民主黨大州，紐約和加州，亞裔用鐵的事實打臉某些有色人種。反襯其好吃懶做，燒殺搶劫，惡跡斑斑，享受著特殊優待，卻一直無恥的喊著自己劣勢。拿曆史做借口，掩蓋現實的不作為。要求分他人的房產和財富，自己卻得意洋洋的拿曆史上的傷口做勳章。

回到司法部的新聞通稿，今天2020年8月13日，司法部通知耶魯大學，判決其非法歧視亞裔和白人申請人，在該校本科錄取過程中，違反1964年民權發第六章（Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act）。

本次的判決是給予兩年前，亞裔團體對耶魯錄取過程的訴狀。筆者注釋，從今後大家多捐款，打官司尤其要打到最高法院，打到以保守派為多數的最高法院，華裔的所有委屈都可以討回來。

現任的共和黨總統做的最棒的政績之一，就是組建了一個以保守派為略微多數的最高法院的團體。華裔請用法律維護自己的權益。呼籲華裔培養自己的孩子少一點數理化，多一點律師和作家，用英語把公道討回來。

“沒有任何形式的種族歧視是善良的。違法將美國人按照種族劃分，將滋生刻板印象，痛苦和分裂。美國的所有機構都應認識到，所有人都應該被體麵和尊敬的對待，不應該因為膚色而非法對待。。。司法部將繼續為全美國的所有人的民權而鬥爭。”

作為繼續獲得數百萬美元資金的前提，耶魯大學表示將服從1964年民權法的規定，禁止因族裔、膚色、來源國等因素非法歧視個人。

司法部消息稱，每年耶魯在本科錄取過程中，因為種族和國籍歧視案件大量存在。與非洲裔相比，亞裔隻有十分之一的可能性被錄取，白人隻有四分之一的可能性被錄取。耶魯每年拒收的亞裔與白人學生至少有數十人。

盡管高院表達國大學可以考慮族裔因素獲取聯邦資金，，但前提是在有限的情況下。而耶魯大學已經將種族因素無限擴大，無處不在。甚至設立了多層次多步驟的錄取程序，直接導致申請人的族裔因素被無限擴大，以便耶魯用族裔平衡其課堂。

司法部不允許耶魯大學用族裔和國籍（National Origin）作為錄取因素，決定2020-2021年的新生錄取。如果耶魯繼續使用族裔和國籍作為未來錄取因素，必須向司法部提交預案，證明其計劃是已經根據法律縮小範圍，並必須提交使用族裔因素錄取的截止日期。

為司法部的結論歡呼，買酒去！

為不屑鬥爭的華裔、亞裔和白人夥伴慶祝！

在美國不鬥爭、不努力不會迎來權利！

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-finds-yale-illegally-discriminates-against-asians-and-whites-undergraduate

 

Department of Justice

Office of Public Affairs

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Thursday, August 13, 2020

Justice Department Finds Yale Illegally Discriminates Against Asians and Whites in Undergraduate Admissions in Violation of Federal Civil-Rights Laws

The Department of Justice today notified Yale University of its findings that Yale illegally discriminates against Asian American and white applicants in its undergraduate admissions process in violation of Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. The findings are the result of a two-year investigation in response to a complaint by Asian American groups concerning Yale’s conduct.  

 

“There is no such thing as a nice form of race discrimination,” said Assistant Attorney General Eric Dreiband for the Civil Rights Division. “Unlawfully dividing Americans into racial and ethnic blocs fosters stereotypes, bitterness, and division. It is past time for American institutions to recognize that all people should be treated with decency and respect and without unlawful regard to the color of their skin. In 1890, Frederick Douglass explained that the ‘business of government is to hold its broad shield over all and to see that every American citizen is alike and equally protected in his civil and personal rights.’ The Department of Justice agrees and will continue to fight for the civil rights of all people throughout our nation.”

 

As a condition of receiving millions of dollars in taxpayer funding, Yale expressly agrees to comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, a cornerstone civil-rights law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in programs and activities that receive federal financial assistance.

 

The Department of Justice found Yale discriminates based on race and national origin in its undergraduate admissions process, and that race is the determinative factor in hundreds of admissions decisions each year. For the great majority of applicants, Asian Americans and whites have only one-tenth to one-fourth of the likelihood of admission as African American applicants with comparable academic credentials. Yale rejects scores of Asian American and white applicants each year based on their race, whom it otherwise would admit.

 

Although the Supreme Court has held that colleges receiving federal funds may consider applicants’ race in certain limited circumstances as one of a number of factors, the Department of Justice found Yale’s use of race is anything but limited. Yale uses race at multiple steps of its admissions process resulting in a multiplied effect of race on an applicant’s likelihood of admission, and Yale racially balances its classes.

 

The Department of Justice has demanded Yale agree not to use race or national origin in its upcoming 2020-2021 undergraduate admissions cycle, and, if Yale proposes to consider race or national origin in future admissions cycles, it must first submit to the Department of Justice a plan demonstrating its proposal is narrowly tailored as required by law, including by identifying a date for the end of race discrimination.

(因為有更多的自由，可以讓思想和文字放飛，來https://t.me/SylviaCA 生活在彼岸電報公號吧……等你哦！)