費米悖論, 黑暗森林法則

（注：黑暗森林法則——宇宙就是一座黑暗森林，每個文明都是帶槍的獵人，像幽靈般潛行於林間，輕輕撥開擋路的樹枝，竭力不讓腳步發出一點聲音，連呼吸都小心翼翼；他必須小心，因為林中到處都有與他一樣潛行的獵人。如果他發現了別的生命，能做的隻有一件：開槍消滅之。在這片森林中，他人就是地獄，就是永恒的威脅。任何暴露自己存在的生命都將很快被消滅。這就是宇宙文明的圖景，這就是對的解釋。隻有通過忠實的映射宇宙來隱藏自我，是融入永恒的唯一途徑。）

叢林法則（The Law of the Jungle），是描述人類社會的詞語。和弱肉強食及“狗咬狗”同意。指的是所有人自私自利，靠暴力或商業競爭贏過其他人，不在乎法治和公平，競爭力較差的人就被淘汰。

1894年，英國作家魯德亞德·吉卜林在他描寫印度叢林的兒童故事《叢林奇譚》中提及過叢林法則。

在當時，某一些信仰種族主義、帝國主義、殖民主義、軍國主義、法西斯主義等的人物，視叢林法則為天條，應用到社會哲學、人類學、優生學、政治學、經濟學、投資學等多方麵去，例如社會達爾文主義等。

由於叢林法則具有不少有助於戲劇的元素，因此有不少電影編劇也引入到其劇情中來，例如《三體II：黑暗森林》《黑社會》等。https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%A3%AE%E6%9E%97%E6%B3%95%E5%89%87

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

基本公理　　 　
Self-evident Truth:
1、生存是文明的第一需要
1.The first demand of every civilization is to survive.
2、文明不斷增長和擴張,但宇宙中的物質總量保持不變
2.In order to survive and develop,every civilization has to contiuously increase their strength and expand ,however,the whole amount of the substabce in the universe never changes.




 

 

回複收起回複

舉報|侵權舉報有害信息舉報2樓2012-01-02 23:14

 

• 我也說一句

   

 

 

 

• 
•  
• 風後起青萍
• 冬眠者

  5

 

猜疑鏈
The suspicious chain　　
1.一個文明不能判斷另一個文明是善文明還是惡文明
1.Every civilization is unable to judge wether the other one is kind or evil.
2.一個文明不能判斷另一個文明認為本文明是善文明還是惡文明
2.Every civilization is unable to judge how the other one thinks of you,kind or evil.
3.一個文明不能判斷另一個文明是否會對本文明發起攻擊
3.Every civilization is unable to judge wether the one will strikes you without declaration.
4.一個文明無法判斷另一個文明對自己是善意或惡意的
4.Every civilization is unable to judge how the other one treat you,in kindness or not.
5.一個文明無法判斷另一個文明認為自己是善意或惡意的
5..Every civilization is unable to judge how the other one thinks of you,are you kind or not.　　

 

 

回複收起回複

舉報|侵權舉報有害信息舉報3樓2012-01-02 23:29

 

• 我也說一句

   

 

 

 

• 
•  
• 風後起青萍
• 冬眠者

  5

 

技術爆炸
Technological Explosition　
文明進步的速度和加速度不見得是一致的，弱小的文明很可能在短時間內超越強大的文明。
The speed and acceleration of a civilization's progress is not always in the same,a weak civilization has much possibility to surpass a strong one in a short period.

 

 

回複收起回複

舉報|侵權舉報有害信息舉報4樓2012-01-03 19:36

 

• 我也說一句

   

 

 

 

• 
•  
• 風後起青萍
• 冬眠者

  5

 

黑暗森林法則
Dark Forest Rule　　
宇宙就是一座黑暗森林，每個文明都是帶槍的獵人，像幽靈般潛行於林間，輕輕撥開擋路的樹枝，竭力不讓腳步發出一點兒聲音，連呼吸都必須小心翼翼：他必須小心，因為林中到處都有與他一樣潛行的獵人，如果他發現了別的生命，能做的隻有一件事：開槍消滅之。在這片森林中，他人就是地獄，就是永恒的威脅，任何暴露自己存在的生命都將很快被消滅，這就是宇宙文明的圖景，這就是對費米悖論的解釋。 　　被發現，即被毀滅！
-----------------------------------------------------------
Our universe is a dark forest,every civilization is a huntor carrying guns walks secretly in the forest like a ghost ,he softly pushes the branches aside and tries his best to avoid any sounds under his foot as well as breathing carefully.He must be catious for the reason that there are others walking like him in the forest.If he finds any life, then the only thing he will do is to shoot and kill it.In this forest,other men are hell that means they are perminent threat,any life expose themselves will be destoryed,that is the image of outer civilization,the explanation to the Fermi paradox.Scarecely had been detected,you were destoryed!

http://tieba.baidu.com/p/1350428045

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

費米悖論

編輯 鎖定

 

1950年的一天，諾貝爾獎獲得者、物理學家費米在和別人討論飛碟及外星人問題時，突然冒出一句：“他們都在哪兒呢？”這句看似簡單的問話，就是著名的“費米悖論”。 “費米悖論”隱含之意是，理論上講，人類能用100萬年的時間飛往銀河係各個星球，那麽，外星人隻要比人類早進化100萬年，現在就應該來到地球了。換言之，“費米悖論”表明了這樣的悖論：A.外星人是存在的——科學推論可以證明，外星人的進化要遠早於人類，他們應該已經來到地球並存在於某處了；B.外星人是不存在的——迄今為止，人類並未發現任何有關外星人存在的蛛絲馬跡。^[1]  闡述的是對地外文明存在性的過高估計和缺少相關證據之間的矛盾。

產生背景編輯

在1950年的一次非正式討論中，諾貝爾獎獲得者、物理學家費米在和別人討論飛碟及外星人的問題時，突然冒出一句：“他們都在哪兒呢？”，如果銀河係存在大量先進的地外文明，那麽為什麽連飛船或者探測器之類的證據都看不到。

對這個話題更加具體的探討最早出現在1975年麥克·哈特的文章中，有時也被叫做麥克·哈特悖論。另一個緊密相關的問題是大沉默——即使難以星際旅行，如果生命是普遍存在的話，為什麽我們探測不到電磁信號？

有人嚐試通過尋找地外文明的證據來解決費米悖論，也提出這些生命可能不具備人類的智慧。也有學者認為高等地外文明根本不存在，或者非常稀少以至於人類不可能聯係得上。地球殊異假說有時被認為為費米悖論提供了一種解釋的答案。

從哈特開始，很多人開始發展關於地外文明的科學理論或模型。大部分工作都引用費米悖論作為參考。很多相關的問題已經得到重視，內容包括天文學、生物學、生態學和哲學。新興的天體生物學給問題的解決引入了跨學科的研究手段。

http://baike.baidu.com/link?url=701LBm6K2wzHjSAM8iBXye_HrbG1hNhSQqQurPusQKBXdygRwY8jEdtk3cgiNWpU_OQylQF_0_2WPGYD4sW66UFKJpGgwW0vrobH2vPMcO21iyUbFa3OX1DTZOUFADNo

Fermi paradox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

Jump to: navigation, search

This article is about the absence of evidence for extraterrestrial intelligence. For the type of estimation problem, see Fermi problem.

"Where is everybody" redirects here. For the Twilight Zone episode, see Where Is Everybody? For the television production company, see Where's Everybody.

 

A graphical representation of the Arecibo message—Humanity's first attempt to use radio waves to actively communicate its existence to alien civilizations

The Fermi paradox or Fermi's paradox, named after physicist Enrico Fermi, is the apparent contradiction between the lack of evidence and high probability estimates, e.g., those given by the Drake equation, for the existence of extraterrestrial civilizations.^[1] The basic points of the argument, made by physicists Enrico Fermi (1901–1954) and Michael H. Hart (born 1932), are:

• There are billions of stars in the galaxy that are similar to the Sun,^[2][3] many of which are billions of years older than Earth.^[4][5]
• With high probability, some of these stars will have Earth-like planets,^[6][7] and if the Earth is typical, some might develop intelligent life.
• Some of these civilizations might develop interstellar travel, a step the Earth is investigating now.
• Even at the slow pace of currently envisioned interstellar travel, the Milky Way galaxy could be completely traversed in a few million years.^[8]

According to this line of reasoning, the Earth should have already been visited by extraterrestrial aliens. In an informal conversation, Fermi noted no convincing evidence of this, leading him to ask, "Where is everybody?"^[9][10] There have been many attempts to explain the Fermi paradox,^[11][12] primarily suggesting either that intelligent extraterrestrial life is extremely rare, or proposing reasons that such civilizations have not contacted or visited Earth.

轉載本文請聯係原作者獲取授權，同時請注明本文來自林之絮科學網博客。
鏈接地址：http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-366091-1029754.html 

very idealistic title: 陋室閱萬卷，足下行千裏

分享
http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/iamhelen88
擇一城終老，和一人白首，從一業修身
It sounds so traditional, so classic, so up-on-the-moon, that you may find it's worthy fighting for in the end !

• 工作情況：
  南京理工大學，講師

• 研究領域：
  信息科學->電子學與信息係統->通信理論與係統