You are close, but not exactly

來源: SwiperTheFox 於 2010-04-15 09:55:41 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 閱讀數 : (364 bytes)
本帖於 2010-04-15 10:02:55 時間, 由版主 於德利 編輯
回答: no 由 SwiperTheFox 於 2010-04-14 08:21:48

Don't rush to judge the quality of the question. From my point of view, it is indeed a good question.

1. Although it is complicated, you can still use combinatorial and permutation. You just need to be careful.

2. The extension of question enter the realm of graph theory, which makes it more interesting, and heading toward broader applications.

所有跟帖： 

• 72=(5!-4!*2) -jinjing- ♀ 給 jinjing 發送悄悄話 (10 bytes) () 04/15/2010 postreply 13:26:38

• This seems to be the best solution, can you reveal details? -SwiperTheFox- ♂ 給 SwiperTheFox 發送悄悄話 SwiperTheFox 的博客首頁 (6 bytes) () 04/16/2010 postreply 09:44:10

• Thanks. -jinjing- ♀ 給 jinjing 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 04/17/2010 postreply 05:17:39

• details? please! -皆兄弟也- ♂ 給 皆兄弟也 發送悄悄話 皆兄弟也 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 04/16/2010 postreply 12:19:17

• 回複：details? please! -jinjing- ♀ 給 jinjing 發送悄悄話 (221 bytes) () 04/16/2010 postreply 16:00:53

• 2*4!可以理解，5!仍不太明白。anyway, thank you! -皆兄弟也- ♂ 給 皆兄弟也 發送悄悄話 皆兄弟也 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 04/16/2010 postreply 20:55:59

• 回複：2*4!可以理解，5!仍不太明白。anyway, thank you! -jinjing- ♀ 給 jinjing 發送悄悄話 (161 bytes) () 04/17/2010 postreply 05:43:11

請您先登陸，再發跟帖！