hmmm，大癡子文采的確８錯！那你到底怎麽看待Clinton造成的＂繁榮＂。。

hmmm，大癡子文采的確８錯！那你到底怎麽看待Clinton造成的＂繁榮＂。。

很多經濟學家可認那是一種＂ Fake Prosperity＂， caused
by the "trickle down" Voodoo economic model,which was destined to fail because it was built on a fiction.

(zt)Prosperity is not possible when workers are not fairly compensated and wealth is not equitably distributed. Our focus should be on creating a system that is sustainable, which means that the needs of workers should take precedent over those of Wall Street.

what do you think about it?

是不是我問的問題又太早？ hehehe

enjoy your trip, 癡子:)

所有跟帖： 

• 謝謝您的支持 ：） -idiot94- ♂ (257 bytes) () 03/18/2009 postreply 18:49:12

• oh，那是我用詞不當，應該說： -戲雨飛鷹- ♀ (73 bytes) () 03/18/2009 postreply 19:06:25

• IMHO, Clinton's economic growth was still indeed -idiot94- ♂ (335 bytes) () 03/18/2009 postreply 19:20:45

• well said! thanks. -戲雨飛鷹- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/19/2009 postreply 05:50:10

• 誰說克林頓不好我跟誰急，阿！ -貧論元- ♂ (268 bytes) () 03/19/2009 postreply 10:47:26

• 克林頓缺乏遠見。 -endofsuburbia- ♂ (190 bytes) () 03/19/2009 postreply 11:37:49

• Let's see how Bill Clinton defended for himself for what respon -戲雨飛鷹- ♀ (1800 bytes) () 03/19/2009 postreply 12:21:01