na
所有跟帖:
• 大部分都好看,但是拒絕自己男朋友穿成這樣。。哈哈哈哈 -中國mm- ♀ (0 bytes) () 10/27/2018 postreply 13:57:47
• 隻對第一張和雪中的圖片感冒。男人很容易overdoing and look absolutely girly,Fendi’s s -valpak- ♀ (0 bytes) () 10/27/2018 postreply 14:15:26
• besides Armani, this Prada collection is full of masculine piece -林海雪原3677- ♂ (0 bytes) () 10/27/2018 postreply 17:02:44
• they are not girly at all. -林海雪原3677- ♂ (0 bytes) () 10/27/2018 postreply 17:05:47
• i agree your view of fendi. -林海雪原3677- ♂ (0 bytes) () 10/27/2018 postreply 17:06:49
• The leather like brownish Armani look delicious in color for man -valpak- ♀ (0 bytes) () 10/27/2018 postreply 14:20:24
• you're always on point. -林海雪原3677- ♂ (0 bytes) () 10/27/2018 postreply 14:30:45
• armani brought POWERFUL. -林海雪原3677- ♂ (0 bytes) () 10/27/2018 postreply 14:34:04
• Well, sweetheart, we are drinking different cup of tea, nothing -valpak- ♀ (0 bytes) () 10/27/2018 postreply 17:33:01
• This collection of Prada look like worker’s unit forms. -valpak- ♀ (0 bytes) () 10/27/2018 postreply 17:48:06
• Specially have name tags on each of them, not my taste. -valpak- ♀ (0 bytes) () 10/27/2018 postreply 17:50:25
• 在男女合流的當今,其實還有必要區分男女服裝嗎? -llarry- ♂ (0 bytes) () 10/27/2018 postreply 19:46:06
• Fashion is personal, you should answer yourself -valpak- ♀ (0 bytes) () 10/27/2018 postreply 20:42:24
• 我刪貼的理由 -林海雪原3677- ♂ (220 bytes) () 10/28/2018 postreply 08:05:58
• 噢,理由在這裏。還需要鍛煉強健的承受能力,哈哈 -米可- ♀ (0 bytes) () 10/28/2018 postreply 22:19:56
• First time on 文學城yesterday, 你說你是亂貼 -valpak- ♀ (0 bytes) () 10/28/2018 postreply 20:27:43
• 所以我就照你說的瞎看,亂說 -valpak- ♀ (0 bytes) () 10/28/2018 postreply 20:28:48
• 覺得fun,沒想到這個結果 -valpak- ♀ (0 bytes) () 10/28/2018 postreply 20:29:25
• Don’t feel well about this -valpak- ♀ (0 bytes) () 10/28/2018 postreply 20:31:29
• 請大哥原諒 -valpak- ♀ (0 bytes) () 10/28/2018 postreply 20:33:21
• 妹妹你大膽往前走 -林海雪原3677- ♂ (429 bytes) () 10/28/2018 postreply 23:32:17
• 刪帖前沒有看到,也沒看懂刪帖的理由 -米可- ♀ (0 bytes) () 10/28/2018 postreply 22:18:33
• 你還需要修煉哪。發帖的誰沒被踩過? -emplid- ♀ (0 bytes) () 10/29/2018 postreply 07:11:56
• Thanks for the kind words -valpak- ♀ (0 bytes) () 10/29/2018 postreply 11:58:26