Calling for violence against the government is generally not protected by the First Amendment in the United States and can have legal consequences.
Second amendment：
the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed," has been interpreted by the Supreme Court to protect individual rights, not just those related to militia service.
The Supreme Court has affirmed that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess firearms, not just for militia service, but also for self-defense, according to the Supreme Court.
去congress.gov 查，槍權用於保護個人權利，用於自衛。沒讓人上街襲警。
加州槍法更嚴，沒有特殊執照，帶槍出門就是犯罪。老街口瓜子散布恐怖言論，錯誤的解釋憲法正案，
?如果縱容，文學城不是有 縱容散布違法，誤導民眾的平台之嫌嗎？
Second amendment：
the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed," has been interpreted by the Supreme Court to protect individual rights, not just those related to militia service.
The Supreme Court has affirmed that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess firearms, not just for militia service, but also for self-defense, according to the Supreme Court.
去congress.gov 查，槍權用於保護個人權利，用於自衛。沒讓人上街襲警。
加州槍法更嚴，沒有特殊執照，帶槍出門就是犯罪。老街口瓜子散布恐怖言論，錯誤的解釋憲法正案，
?如果縱容，文學城不是有 縱容散布違法，誤導民眾的平台之嫌嗎？
