Firstly , yes. You must repair to have water available no matter whose fault it was.
If the heating was turned off by the tenant because they wanted to save money with a bill in their name then , under the terms of a normal lease, they have caused damage to the property. All of my leases had a clause that stated that the tenant must notify me immediately of any issues and MUST NOT NEGLECT ANY UPKEEP OR CAUSE ANY DAMAGE BY NEGLECT.
Under any sensible interpretation the tenant caused this and I would either get them to agree a payment plan or serve a Notice to Quit for damaging the property.
It often surprised me that I had to reiterate to many that a low level heat MUST be kept going during a cold spell - also having to point out that setting a thermostat at a level and using that as a base level was cheaper than switching off for long periods and then running at a high level to bring the temp right up. ( And that was in two houses that had a B2 cert. ie: easy to reach & retain an ambient level of heat.)
穀歌翻譯貼不上
誰的錯，你都必須維修才能有水。
如果租戶因為省錢而關閉暖氣，那麽根據正常租約的條款，他們已經對房產造成了損害。我所有的租約都有一條條款，規定租戶必須立即通知我任何問題，並且不得忽視任何維護或因疏忽造成任何損害。
根據任何合理的解釋，這都是租戶造成的，我會讓他們同意付款計劃或以損壞房產為由發出退租通知。
我經常感到驚訝的是，我不得不向許多人重申，在寒冷時期必須保持低水平的熱量 - 還必須指出，將恒溫器設置在某個水平並以此作為基準水平比長時間關閉然後以高水平運行以將溫度升至更高水平更便宜。 （這兩棟房子都擁有 B2 認證，即：易於達到並保持環境熱量水平。）
