中國大陸武器發展的宣傳與實際 - 這是AI幫我寫的 …

 

Propaganda and Reality in China’s Weapons Development

 

 

China has become skilled at using military parades to showcase new weapons, projecting an image of parity with the United States. Yet Western defense analysts recognize a recurring pattern: propaganda consistently runs ahead of technical maturity.

 

The J-20 stealth fighter is the clearest example. From its first appearance, it was promoted as China’s answer to the F-22. But for over a decade, it relied on Russian engines that lacked the thrust and stealth refinements needed for true fifth-generation performance. China’s domestic WS-15 engine, intended to close that gap, has suffered years of delays and reliability issues. Only recently has it begun entering limited service, and its durability is still unproven. In practice, the J-20 has long been a stealthy airframe paired with engines a generation behind — a stark contrast to the parade-ground narrative of immediate fifth-generation parity.

 

Other cases show the same dynamic. The DF-41 ICBM is hailed as road-mobile, yet its enormous launcher vehicles are confined to reinforced routes, making it far less flexible than advertised. The Type 055 destroyer looks formidable with its size and missile load, but faces propulsion reliability issues and lacks the proven at-sea testing that underpins U.S. AEGIS destroyers. The carrier program has produced large hulls but still lags in aircraft capability and operational doctrine. The Jin-class SSBNs give China a nominal sea-based deterrent, but their noise and missile range severely constrain their credibility.

 

Western analysts are well aware of this pattern. Still, some commentators, dazzled by the imagery of China’s parades, talk as if the United States should retreat from the Western Pacific. The evidence suggests the opposite: China’s military is advancing, but the gap between propaganda and reliable, combat-proven capability remains wide. The J-20, showcased as a peer to America’s stealth fighters but hobbled for years by engine immaturity, illustrates this gap better than anything else.

所有跟帖: 

9.3大戲即將上演,坐看時壇吹捧狂潮。 -Uusequery- 給 Uusequery 發送悄悄話 (167 bytes) () 09/01/2025 postreply 16:12:36

反賊們回國當參議員的夢想又遠了一些,哈哈,現在已經推遲到十年以後了,最後可能要家祭無忘告乃翁的 -bestlie- 給 bestlie 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/02/2025 postreply 10:56:30

1.某國對中國戰鬥機和導彈低估,現在想買後悔藥而不得 -cn_abcd- 給 cn_abcd 發送悄悄話 cn_abcd 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 09/01/2025 postreply 16:17:49

2.宇宙第一的海軍現在要在西太平洋打遊擊戰 -cn_abcd- 給 cn_abcd 發送悄悄話 cn_abcd 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 09/01/2025 postreply 16:18:26

後續是泰國,印尼和埃及都沒有跟進。 -Uusequery- 給 Uusequery 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/01/2025 postreply 16:26:22

這又如何,想跟也要和自己國力,假象敵匹配 -cn_abcd- 給 cn_abcd 發送悄悄話 cn_abcd 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 09/01/2025 postreply 16:29:10

伊朗買了再說吧。隻有一個“仆從國”在用無法說明其優異。 -Uusequery- 給 Uusequery 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/01/2025 postreply 16:36:25

印巴空戰的意義被誇大。現代的空空導彈都可以由預警機導引,和發射導彈的戰鬥機沒什麽關係。巴方隻是現代標準戰法,印方太差而已 -大觀園的賈探春- 給 大觀園的賈探春 發送悄悄話 大觀園的賈探春 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 09/01/2025 postreply 16:28:04

印巴空戰的意義必須被縮小, -大洋bridge- 給 大洋bridge 發送悄悄話 大洋bridge 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 09/01/2025 postreply 18:17:30

美國空軍司令還去巴基斯坦取經呢。可見你的偏見和事實不符。 -sjhp66ds- 給 sjhp66ds 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/01/2025 postreply 19:17:31

這種戰術問題那會派個空軍司令去取經?別開玩笑了。空軍司令肯定是為了政策問題去的,隻是被自媒體拿來做文章自嗨而已。 -大觀園的賈探春- 給 大觀園的賈探春 發送悄悄話 大觀園的賈探春 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 09/01/2025 postreply 20:46:16

看來AI確實很懂你,沒事,繼續奏樂繼續舞就好了,中國的東西都是假的騙的偷的,不要緊的 -bestlie- 給 bestlie 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/02/2025 postreply 04:43:25

沒那麽嚴重,就是喜歡誇大,技術還遠不成熟時就拿出來顯擺。總之就是宣傳效果重於實際功效。 -大觀園的賈探春- 給 大觀園的賈探春 發送悄悄話 大觀園的賈探春 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 09/02/2025 postreply 05:42:50

中國都試飛了官方也沒宣傳,美國連PPT都沒定型就吹成殲星艦了........所以說人一極端就會變蠢 -bestlie- 給 bestlie 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/02/2025 postreply 10:03:58

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!