Jan 6暴力衝擊國會大廈的犯罪分子被清理了嗎？煽動者呢？

所有跟帖： 

• 2024年總統大選的結果已經回答了這個問題。提醒一下，單靠MAGAers川普當不了總統。總票數也超過了一半。 -Uusequery- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 14:23:22

• 大選和Jan 6暴力犯罪有什麽關係？ -監考老師- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 14:26:00

• 自己理解。 -Uusequery- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 14:28:54

• No! Although the Jan 6 rioters were pardoned by executive -青雨紫煙- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 14:28:54

• authority, this does not equate to innocence; rather, it -青雨紫煙- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 14:30:52

• it confirms their legal status as individuals guilty of -青雨紫煙- ♀ (131 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 14:32:09

• so you are saying all pardoned by biden are real criminals -internuts- ♂ (43 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 14:35:44

• Or, in general, all who were pardoned were criminals? -Uusequery- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 14:43:28

• Yes, legitimate criminals Or being retaliated ones -青雨紫煙- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 14:46:08

• 天青水藍, could you verify if her statement is correct? :) -internuts- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 14:48:50

• So, following your explanation, those Jan.6 guys could be -Uusequery- ♀ (37 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 14:50:26

• the fact is the us law already sentenced them as criminals -青雨紫煙- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 14:51:52

• Unless you don’t obey and accept the us law and orders. -青雨紫煙- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 14:52:23

• Everyone should obey the law. The question is if the people -Uusequery- ♀ (70 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 14:56:56

• They have right to appeal but if law does not say you are -青雨紫煙- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 14:59:08

• you are innocent then pardon admits the legitimate fact. -青雨紫煙- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 15:00:12

• All I am saying is pardon !=innocent. Got it? Quite opposit -青雨紫煙- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 14:55:07

• Dr. Fauci and General Miley were pardoned by Biden, they are -Uusequery- ♀ (62 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 15:21:36

• Were they sentenced as criminals before by law? -青雨紫煙- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 15:26:57

• Then why pardon them, pardon for what? -Uusequery- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 15:35:21

• To be retaliated -青雨紫煙- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 15:40:11

• not joking? Where is the justice in the US? -Uusequery- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 15:44:28

• You meant trumps executive orders? -青雨紫煙- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 16:02:34

• those like chaney have not gone thru legal procedings but -internuts- ♂ (174 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 14:52:23

• 癡呆政府不是違法起訴了嗎。 被高院判無效。 已經過了法律程序了。 -bustout- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 14:29:06

• 大多數美國選民同意高院判決， 重選船鋪入住白宮。 -bustout- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 14:31:40

• 川普再次入住白宮，美國人民最為最大的陪審團已經宣布了他們的審判結果 -隨意看看～- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 14:51:55

• 不記得Jan 6被告中有誰被jury定罪，好像都是自己plea guilty的。pardon隻是豁免了懲罰不等於沒發生過 -天青水藍- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 15:26:59

• Fauci也是？ -Uusequery- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 15:37:59

• Fauci還沒有被起訴呢。至少得先被聯邦起訴後才有機會plea guilty -天青水藍- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 15:44:36

• 如連被告自己都認為自己有罪，還有誰能辯稱他們無罪？老川隻是運用總統特赦權赦免了他們的懲罰，萬斯甚至說過打傷警察的不應赦免 -天青水藍- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 15:41:00