it's not about the price, but really the liqudity

來源: abc-nezha 於 2025-09-26 08:45:59 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 閱讀數 : (382 bytes)
回答: 為什麽買Leap時最好選擇高價股票 由 lionhill 於 2025-09-26 07:51:57

As brightline said, you may just incease the quantity to achieve 1#1. leverage and #4.delta. for #3, quailty and price might have correlationship, but are not determined by each other (UNH?).

so yes, buy leaps with high quality and highly liquid assets, but high price sbhould not be a factor. Many index ETFs are with low price but high liqudity. 

所有跟帖： 

• 你還沒理解重點，基本麵和percentage move相同情況下最好選high priced stock -lionhill- ♂ 給 lionhill 發送悄悄話 lionhill 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 09/26/2025 postreply 08:55:29

• that's fine. just don't decide only by the price -abc-nezha- ♂ 給 abc-nezha 發送悄悄話 (167 bytes) () 09/26/2025 postreply 09:17:01

• 同樣% move ,低價股由OTM to ATM, 高價股由OTM to DITM -lionhill- ♂ 給 lionhill 發送悄悄話 lionhill 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 09/26/2025 postreply 08:57:22

• depending on the IV and duration of the option -abc-nezha- ♂ 給 abc-nezha 發送悄悄話 (50 bytes) () 09/26/2025 postreply 09:14:35

• 這個有些關係不是決定性因素 -lionhill- ♂ 給 lionhill 發送悄悄話 lionhill 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 09/26/2025 postreply 09:26:04

• 不對，same % move =》 same moneyness change，和價位無關 -dancingpig- ♀ 給 dancingpig 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/26/2025 postreply 10:29:05

• 同意，根據Black-Scholes 期權定價模型，跟股價的相對值有關，絕對值無關。高價股流動性 -GandalfOld- ♂ 給 GandalfOld 發送悄悄話 (168 bytes) () 09/26/2025 postreply 09:59:06

請您先登陸，再發跟帖！