中華人民共和國學校教材中的抗日戰爭(1949-1982)

The War of Resistance Against Japan in PRC’s School Textbooks (1949–1982)

地址鏈接:https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cat-2024-0005/html

節選:

Despite the overall heroic tone, textbooks did mention Japanese atrocities to varying degrees, and narratives of these war crimes remained consistent between 1949 and 1982. Even in primary school textbooks, the brutality of the Japanese army was described: ‘The Japanese army brutally massacred many Chinese people, and humiliated Chinese women. Whenever Japanese army went, it would burn down the villages and loot all the assets there’.[5]

Descriptions of Japanese atrocities were typically placed in three main sections of the textbooks. The first section followed the account of the Manchurian Incident, detailing the harsh Japanese rule in Northeast China to set up the main narrative of resistance led by the CCP. For instance, Gaojizhongxue Zhongguo xiandaishi (1960) said: ‘After having occupied North-east China, Japanese imperialists carried out cruel colonial rule of North-eastern people. From the central government of the fake “Manchukuo” to the local administrations were controlled by the Japanese invader. There, the ten-household-Tithing System --- one person broke the law, ten households would be punished --- was widely in practice. Japanese imperialist carried out slave education in order to suppress North-eastern People’s patriotism. It also encouraged people to plant and smoke opium, which destroyed North-eastern People’s health. Japanese army’s atrocities, like arson, killing, loot and rape were countless. Japanese imperialist monopolised the economic lifeline in North-east. It controlled the mines, factories, transportation and so forth, forced North-eastern people to work like slaves and grabbed the land as well as property of North-eastern people as it wish …’[6]

The second section appeared after the account of the Marco Polo Bridge Incident, where how the Japanese army brutally occupied Chinese cities was described to criticize the KMT’s one-sided resistance. The Nanjing Massacre was highlighted in a 1960 high school textbook and its subsequent editions.[7] An accompanying reference book for teachers in Shanghai, which was based on other history books edited or written by some mainstream Chinese historians at the time, included more detail about this history, which indicates that the students might have received a different degree of teaching about the Japanese atrocities from their teachers. The reference book further pointed out cruelty was a feature of Imperial Japanese Army and the Nanjing Massacre was only a typical example.[8] During and after the Cultural Revolution, the Nanjing Massacre was depicted with increasing graphic detail. For instance, Chuzhong Zhongguo lishi (1979) described: ‘The Japanese army carried out insane massacre after occupying Nanjing. Some of the peaceful citizens in Nanjing were used as the targets for practicing shooting, some of them were used as the objects for competing bayonet [skills], some of them were thrown gasoline on and burned to death, some of them were buried alive and the hearts as well as livers of some of them were dug out. Within one month, the amount of people killed was more than 300,000 and more than one-third of houses were burned. That period, in the city of Nanjing, skeletons were everywhere and rubbles heaped up,sinister wind was sad --- the whole city immediately became a hell on earth.’[9]

 

 

所有跟帖: 

1957年第一版人民教育出版社出版的高級中學課本《中國曆史》第4冊第40頁 -supercs88- 給 supercs88 發送悄悄話 supercs88 的博客首頁 (504 bytes) () 05/09/2025 postreply 21:20:28

他轉的那個小網文,漏洞百出。真的不值一駁。我是不想浪費時間。沒想到兄弟你認真且肯花時間,佩服! -新手庚- 給 新手庚 發送悄悄話 新手庚 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 05/09/2025 postreply 21:32:46

都是英文的,我們以前肯定沒學過。 -最接近太陽的人- 給 最接近太陽的人 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 05/10/2025 postreply 05:36:04

懷疑你和點讚的那位懂不懂英文,別人說的是中國學校裏的曆史教材,怎麽可能是英文的呢?:) -supercs88- 給 supercs88 發送悄悄話 supercs88 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 05/10/2025 postreply 08:19:17

老兄一定沒有讀引用的文章。嘿嘿 -Uusequery- 給 Uusequery 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 05/10/2025 postreply 09:05:06

或者沒有細讀。 -Uusequery- 給 Uusequery 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 05/10/2025 postreply 09:07:11

+1 -最接近太陽的人- 給 最接近太陽的人 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 05/10/2025 postreply 09:13:28

哈哈,我不像你們沒腦子,發帖之前就研究了一下,老共以階級鬥爭為綱,並沒有隱瞞南京大屠殺。 -supercs88- 給 supercs88 發送悄悄話 supercs88 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 05/10/2025 postreply 14:27:52

錯了,您對那群貨不了解,TA們的所謂“反駁證據”,和論題都沒有邏輯關係,甚至是支持對方觀點的 -jinjiaodw- 給 jinjiaodw 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 05/10/2025 postreply 09:29:55

你們幾位是文盲嗎?不認識漢字還是裝不認識?白紙黑字,睜眼說瞎話就沒意思了。金角撒謊成性,你們要跟他學? -新手庚- 給 新手庚 發送悄悄話 新手庚 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 05/10/2025 postreply 09:44:28

怪不得一篇主貼也不會寫。 -老生常談12- 給 老生常談12 發送悄悄話 老生常談12 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 05/10/2025 postreply 11:19:23

又開始罵街和飆髒,毛 粉的人品,素質和教養都差得無底線 -jinjiaodw- 給 jinjiaodw 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 05/10/2025 postreply 11:30:09

你是說蔣老師嗎?文盲這些詞他是沒少用啊。不過這是你對他的評價,我可沒說啊,別以後又撒謊說是我說的蔣老師。:) -新手庚- 給 新手庚 發送悄悄話 新手庚 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 05/10/2025 postreply 12:32:46

草包也是文盲。:) -supercs88- 給 supercs88 發送悄悄話 supercs88 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 05/10/2025 postreply 14:29:20

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!