這裏有些人可能是有別的目的

首先看一下報道：
Today, the President released his 2014 federal income tax returns. He and the First Lady filed their income tax returns jointly and reported adjusted gross income of $477,383. The Obamas paid $93,362 in total tax.

“The President and First Lady also reported donating $70,712 – or about 14.8 percent of their adjusted gross income – to 33 different charities. The largest reported gift to charity was $22,012 to the Fisher House Foundation. The President’s effective federal income tax rate is 19.6 percent.” 來自https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2015/04/10/president-obama-and-vice-president-biden-s-2014-tax-returns

有人試圖混淆的是調節後的毛收入，和可征稅的收入。

美國財務方麵有數不清的高手，這種公開發表的東西，如果有問題的話，早就已經沸沸揚揚了。

所有跟帖： 

• 我用的是TAX/AGI，這是個貫常的作法，幾乎大家都用總收入和所交的稅相比，每個人抵稅額因人不同，幾乎無法相比。這個TAX/AG -FL棉農- ♂ (0 bytes) () 07/01/2015 postreply 18:30:56

• 關於誰別有用心，那你可是在講版主，他登的，我就是議論，和我有個P關係。版主咋意思你最好找他理論。 -FL棉農- ♂ (195 bytes) () 07/01/2015 postreply 18:33:21

• 你下麵寫得清清楚楚是“可征稅收入” -Wjin2002- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/01/2015 postreply 18:35:01

• 所有人都用同一個相同對應數字，無區別，一律平等。TAX/AGI -FL棉農- ♂ (6 bytes) () 07/01/2015 postreply 18:36:51

• 另外，這原話照抄版主的話，一字不改。 -FL棉農- ♂ (0 bytes) () 07/01/2015 postreply 18:39:07

• 到底是“我用的TAX/AGI”,還是“原話照抄版主的話”？說謊還是蠻難的。 -Wjin2002- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/01/2015 postreply 19:13:34

• 小編，混人講你在撒謊，NND,滅了他。 -FL棉農- ♂ (0 bytes) () 07/01/2015 postreply 19:19:24