這些數字有統計意義麽？福特爆胎死亡人數271，GM打火鬆動死亡124

如果沒有的話，為啥要大規模召回和大筆罰錢？

 

The Firestone and Ford tire controversy was a period of unusually high failures of P235/75R15 ATX, ATX II, and Wilderness AT tires installed on the Ford Explorerand other related vehicles.

The tire failures are linked to 271 fatalities and over eight hundred injuries in the United States with more injuries and fatalities occurring internationally,^[1][2] it led Bridgestone/Firestone and Ford Motor Company to recall and replace 23 million tires.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firestone_and_Ford_tire_controversy

 

General Motors will settle with 124 families over deaths resulting from faulty ignition switches that were installed in the 2.6 million small cars recalled last year, including the Chevrolet Cobalt and HHR, Pontiac G5 and Sky, and Saturn Ion and Solstice. 

https://blog.caranddriver.com/gm-ignition-switch-review-complete-124-fatalities-274-injuries/

所有跟帖： 

• 這些和統計無關。如果你想從中推出“買輛福特車會爆胎的概率”或者“買輛GM車會打火鬆動的概率”，那麽沒有統計意義。 -QuantPM- ♂ (0 bytes) () 10/17/2017 postreply 10:35:01

• 如果想再從“豐田某某事死x人，x<271”推出“豐田比福特好”，就更沒有統計意義。 -QuantPM- ♂ (0 bytes) () 10/17/2017 postreply 10:38:17

• 假如在福特和GM召回前你看到了以上數字，vs.另一個0死亡率的，你買哪個？ -basicenglish- ♂ (3123 bytes) () 10/17/2017 postreply 10:41:56

• 我今年1月買新車，按我的預算，安全性考慮，理性地選了Escalade ESV。之前是兩輛GL開了10多年。這種數據不在考慮之列。 -QuantPM- ♂ (0 bytes) () 10/17/2017 postreply 11:10:54