I will but it depends....

來源: Oneshotkill 2015-08-07 19:36:28 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (1708 bytes)
本文內容已被 [ Oneshotkill ] 在 2015-08-07 19:37:55 編輯過。如有問題,請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.

有人這麽認為,至少我覺得有道理。

Removing the resonator does 2 things, it turns the interior airflow from laminar to turbulent flow and it decreases the resonant frequency effect which means that you not only get less airflow, you also decrease the overpressure delivered to the valves at the rpm that the resonator is designed for (which in a R18A1 is probably 3000-4500 rpm).

It does open up the airflow at higher rpms from less restriction, but probably not enough to counteract the last 2 problems which means you'll get a "swirling" intake sound, lower midrange power and most likely the same, or very, very slightly increased power that can also just be attributed to the standard deviation of error between dyno runs.

Resonator removal is almost always a bad idea unless you can model the fluid dynamics yourself and design/fabricate anew one for the targeted rpm range you want more power at (which in all likelihood would be 5000-6500rpm since that's really the only place it would be able to improve anything measurably, though not substantially).

The only other reason for resonator removal is in the case of forced induction or other major engine intake mods (like a new head), at which point you probably wouldn't have a stock intake anymore anyways.

DIY: Removing the Intake Resonator

所有跟帖: 

非常感謝解答。 -二泉映月09- 給 二泉映月09 發送悄悄話 二泉映月09 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 08/08/2015 postreply 04:31:29

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”