回複：回複：嗬嗬，二哥的回答有意思吧？可我不明白二哥為何又要問ford...

You are right, 10 years ago Explorer is probably smaller than current CRV, but 10 years ago, every car is smaller.  Size is a relative concept.  When everybody drives a Civic, your Civic is probably safe enough.  If everybody drives a big SUV your Civic is a death trap.  Also, car safety ratings are the comparison among same categories - about the same mass.  It's based on the collision between your car and a still object with a infinite mass.  If your Civic collides with a Explorer, Explorer has a larger mass than your Civic.  Think hard about this.

所有跟帖： 

• 10年前的Explorer也比2011的CRV大.我都開過.根本不是一個級別的東西 -滿地找牙- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/18/2011 postreply 12:11:35

• 回複：10年前的Explorer也比2011的CRV大.我都開過.根本不是一個級別的東西 -二哥- ♂ (1042 bytes) () 08/18/2011 postreply 13:42:10

• 你知道不知道Explorer早已經不生產2門了?你知道2門4門什麽區別嗎? -滿地找牙- ♂ (121 bytes) () 08/18/2011 postreply 16:53:03

• 回複：你知道不知道 -二哥- ♂ (204 bytes) () 08/19/2011 postreply 07:15:24

• 不就說個車嗎,哪裏來那麽大火氣.我可沒有興趣說服誰,講點事實數據而已 -滿地找牙- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/19/2011 postreply 09:55:12

• 2011的Explorer壓縮了,可能跟2012的加長CRV大小接近些 -滿地找牙- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/18/2011 postreply 12:27:33

• 回複： -二哥- ♂ (298 bytes) () 08/18/2011 postreply 13:46:16