卡爾森說1月6日抗議是和平的。 連共和黨的議員都譴責他重寫曆史。那些議員當時在場，生命受到威脅。
“With regard to the presentation on Fox News last night, I want to associate myself entirely with the opinion of the chief of the Capitol Police about what happened on Jan. 6,” McConnell said Tuesday, adding that in his view, Manger “correctly describes what most of us witnessed firsthand on Jan. 6.”
“It was a mistake, in my view, for Fox News to depict this in a way that is completely at variance with what our chief law enforcement official here at Capitol thinks,” he added.
Sen. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., told CNN, “To somehow put that in the same category as a permitted peaceful protest is just a lie.”
"I was here," Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana told Politico. "It was not peaceful. It was an abomination. You’re entitled to believe what you want in America, but you can’t resort to violence to try to convince others of your point of view."
“The American people saw what happened on Jan. 6." Utah Sen. Mitt Romney said to reporters. "They’ve seen the people that got injured. They saw the damage to the building. You can’t hide the truth by selectively picking a few minutes out of tapes and saying this is what went on.
"It’s so absurd. It’s nonsense," Romey continued. "It’s a very dangerous thing to do, to suggest that attacking the Capitol of the United States is in any way acceptable and it’s anything other than a serious crime, against democracy and against our country.
"Trying to normalize that behavior is dangerous and disgusting," Romney added.
And Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., told NBC that Carlson’s claims are “bull****.”
"When you see police officers assaulted, all of that ... if you were just a tourist, you should've probably lined up at the visitors' center and came in on an orderly basis,” he said.
法庭文件顯示， 卡爾森（Tucker Carlson）主張解雇Fox台的白宮記者，因為那個記者去核實川普的選舉舞弊論。 卡爾森說，這個記者的行為傷害了公司，公司的股價下跌,“這不是開玩笑”。
There's a text in particular from Tucker Carlson, and he is suggesting here that a FOX News White House correspondent should be fired for fact-checking a Trump claim about the election. He says: "Please get her fired. I'm actually shocked. It needs to be stopped immediately, like tonight. It's measurably hurting the company. The stock price is down. Not a joke."
一個川普的前支持者叫Ray Epps，他1月6日去了DC, 但沒有進入國會大廈。因此沒有被起訴。塔克•卡爾森就在福克斯電台上散布陰謀論，說Ray Epps是替聯邦調查局工作，故意煽動暴亂，然後以此為借口鎮壓保守派人士。 Ray Epps因此受到死亡威脅。害的他和太太賣了房子和生意躲起來。這個Ray Epps很生氣，他說很多參加暴亂的，明明是聽了福克斯台包括卡爾森的煽動才去的。 卡爾森卻倒打一耙。 連代理暴亂者案子的律師，都告訴卡爾森，不要再發表這些無稽之談。
樹沒皮怎辦 發表評論於 2023-05-26 11:24:39
當一個主持人，撒謊成性，台前公開講的，和背後私下講的完全不一樣，這是個騙子，為了流量和股份的騙子，對這樣騙子的言論，俺當然都要打問號，fact check, 而不是盲信。
他在公開節目中，慷慨激昂，義憤填膺，散布大選舞弊論，很多人受了他的煽動去了DC，但他私下說，選舉舞弊論 "absurd" "shockingly reckless", "There wasn't enough fraud to change the outcome".
他說1月6日那天抗議是很和平美麗的一天，沒有暴力。連暴亂當天在場的共和黨議員都譴責他。
他說是FBI的探子挑起的暴亂，讓因為參與暴亂被起訴的被告的律師，都勸他不要再講了。
fact check: 他是前30個衝進國會的其中的一個。最初被起訴6項罪名。他和檢方最後達成認罪協議，認了其中一條罪，於2021年11月被法官判41個月。他於今年5月25日被提前釋放，主要因為他在監獄表現好。 Chansley received an early release, in part, because of his good behavior while in prison, says Albert Watkins, who represented Chansley through his plea and sentencing.
"Mr. Chansley can now move forward with his life. For that I applaud the BOP （即Bureau of Prison美國建議管理局," Watkins told NPR in a statement. 並不是他被無罪釋放。
--------------------
密林深處 發表評論於 2023-05-26 07:16:08
牛麵男因為Tucker Carson的視頻給放了，沒有暴力行為就不應該被判罪。
樹沒皮怎辦 發表評論於 2023-05-26 07:46:50
他被判的法條：
18 USC 2384: Seditious conspiracy
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808 ; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, §1, 70 Stat. 623 ; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148 .)
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §6 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §6, 35 Stat. 1089 ).
樹沒皮怎辦 發表評論於 2023-05-26 14:01:56貼標簽有時是必要的。連福克斯電台都承認他
=====
貼標簽，從輕裏說是懶惰行為，從重裏說是顛倒黑白行為。難怪沒樹皮網友仇恨川普，因為川普喜歡Hard Working People，而不是你這種懶惰之人。
無論你給人戴多少帽子，貼多少標簽，再找多少權威言論來佐證，卡爾森節目裏牛麵男的和平事實你是沒有辦法改變的。我看到了你的搜索能耐很大，何不搜一段牛麵男行暴的鏡頭，然後你再你卡爾森戴帽子，那時這網上的人無話可說。否則你怎麽能把這個黑白顛倒過來呢？
把說真話說成是搞"propaganda",我無法用語言來描述這位H網友，看來你也得勤快一點，多做些研究。