【原創】反移民，反非法移民是和反對轉基因食品同樣的邏輯

這是我的原創，也是我最近想明白的事兒（指反移民，特別是反非法移民）。所以拿出來，也想聽聽各位的看法。

先說轉基因食品。反轉基因食品是我的一貫立場。這觀點我以前也寫過的。在購物的時候，隻要是有機食品（特別是非轉基因的），即使貴，我們都選擇有機食品和非轉基因食品。之所以這樣做，倒不是因為擔心轉基因食品的安全性。食用轉基因食品是否安全？沒有人知道。因為沒有做過這方麵的科研。說它們安全，隻是憑一些基本推理而已。

但是我之所以反對轉基因食品，是出於下麵的理由。轉基因食品是華爾街的資本家們強加給我們的。資本家們的理由看似很崇高，就是要填飽人類的肚子，因為地球是可以容納七十億人口的。但是在這偽善的崇高下，他們賺了錢，卻把這些多餘的人口當作沉重的包袱留給整個社會。因為每多一個人，他不僅僅要消耗食品，他還要消耗水、電，還有教育、房屋和享受等等資源，而地球上所有這些資源都是有限的。更不用說這些人口也往往是低品質的人口。

理由充分嗎？我覺得是充分的。因為我們人首先就應該是自私的，無利不早起。站在這一點上出發，再來談談我作為移民，為什麽現在開始反對移民，特別是非法移民了呢？

其實這個邏輯是同樣的。假如政府不斷的引進廉價的移民，那麽政府就不會投資（分蛋糕）給現有的美國人，特別是年輕人。這樣的結果必然就是美國人繼續少結婚，少生娃。進而需要不斷的移民。而現在引進的廉價移民，尤其是非法移民，在總體上是會降低美國人的整體素質的。

隻有當終止了移民（除了極少數情況外），特別是終止非法移民後，全美國需要理性討論和辯論，就達成建成怎樣的一個社會，怎樣的一個可持續，健康的社會達成共識，並就怎樣鼓勵（即多多的給紅利）美國年輕一代結婚生子達成共識，這樣才能保持美國社會的健康和穩定。

而不斷的廉價移民，尤其是非法移民，正在不斷的侵蝕美國這塊大蛋糕。。。

[金筆]

AI English translation (By ChatGPT)

Title: Opposition to Immigration — Especially Illegal Immigration — Follows the Same Logic as Opposition to Genetically Modified Foods


This is something original from me, and also something I’ve only recently come to understand (referring to opposition to immigration, especially illegal immigration). I’m sharing it here and would also like to hear everyone’s views.

Let me start with genetically modified (GM) foods. Opposing GM foods has always been my consistent position. I’ve written about this before. When shopping, if organic food is available (especially non-GMO), even if it’s more expensive, we choose organic and non-GMO products. This is our way of supporting organic and non-GMO foods.

The reason for doing so is not because I am worried about the safety of GM foods. Are GM foods safe to eat? No one really knows, because there hasn’t been sufficient scientific research on this issue. Claims that they are safe are based only on certain basic inferences.

However, my opposition to GM foods is based on the following reasoning: GM foods were imposed on us by Wall Street capitalists. Their justification appears noble — to feed humanity, since the Earth can “accommodate” seven billion people. But beneath this seemingly noble cause, they make money while leaving these “extra” people as a heavy burden for society as a whole. Because every additional person not only consumes food, but also water, electricity, education, housing, and other resources — and all of these resources on Earth are limited. Not to mention that these populations are often of lower quality.

Is this reasoning sufficient? I believe it is. Because human beings should first be self-interested; no one acts without benefit. From that standpoint, let me now talk about why, as an immigrant myself, I have begun to oppose immigration, especially illegal immigration.

The logic is the same. If the government continuously brings in cheap immigrant labor, then it will not invest (or “share the pie”) with existing Americans, especially young people. The inevitable result is that Americans will continue to marry less and have fewer children. That in turn creates the need for even more immigration.

Moreover, the cheap immigrants being brought in now, especially illegal immigrants, will overall lower the general quality of Americans.

Only when immigration is halted (except in a very small number of cases), especially illegal immigration, can the entire country engage in rational discussion and debate about what kind of society we want to build, what kind of sustainable and healthy society we aim to form, and reach a consensus on how to encourage the younger generation of Americans to marry and have children (for example, by providing substantial benefits to families with children). Only in this way can American society maintain health and stability.

But continuous cheap immigration, especially illegal immigration, is steadily eroding this large American “pie”…

[金筆]

回複 '新林院' 的評論 :

移民也是一樣的。它從根本上它是毒藥。因為有廉價的非法移民或者移民存在，政府政府不願意做hard choice，比如大幅提高公民家庭生孩子的福利，結果就是不停的需要移民補充，長期結果就是國民素質下降。國家被這些低端人口充斥。

[新林院]

【資本家們的理由看似很崇高，就是要填飽人類的肚子，因為地球是可以容納七十億人口的。】
1955 年，世界人口二十億。
2015 年，世界人口七十億。
世界人口如果能降回到二十億，不用轉基因，糧食也夠吃。
二十億人，吃天然糧食。
七十億人，吃轉基因糧食。
這兩個選擇，很明顯第一個更好。
現在歐美、東亞生育率已經下降了。
隻有非洲還在六個、七個地生。
控製非法移民，讓非洲過剩人口流不出去，才能使非洲越來越擁擠，他們才會有危機感，才會自覺降低生育率。