閉目養神

如果你不幸進來了,你會失望。如果在這裏,你學到點什麽,或有什麽感受,那更是浪費你的時間了,咳,咳!
個人資料
金筆 (熱門博主)
  • 博客訪問:
歸檔
正文

聳人聽聞嗎?一項普林斯頓回顧性研究發現:美國已不再是個民主國家了!

(2015-10-27 09:39:27) 下一個

究竟誰在統治美國?普林斯頓學者 Martin Gilens and Benjamin I. Page 認為,在過去幾十年中,美國的政治製度已經緩慢地從民主體製轉換成寡頭政治,富人擁有極大的權利。

Martin Gilens and Benjamin I. Page 是在整理總結1981年至2002年間,一千八百餘項政策法案後,得出的結論,即富人,有社會關係者,在左右著美國政治,他們甚至可以背離廣大選民的意誌和願望。

Asking "[w]ho really rules?" researchers Martin Gilens and Benjamin I. Page argue that over the past few decades America's political system has slowly transformed from a democracy into an oligarchy, where wealthy elites wield most power.

Using data drawn from over 1,800 different policy initiatives from 1981 to 2002, the two conclude that rich, well-connected individuals on the political scene now steer the direction of the country, regardless of or even against the will of the majority of voters.

TPM Interview: Scholar Behind Viral 'Oligarchy' Study Tells You What It Means

"The central point that emerges from our research is that economic elites and organized groups representing business interests have substantial independent impacts on U.S. government policy," they write, "while mass-based interest groups and average citizens have little or no independent influence."

As one illustration, Gilens and Page compare the political preferences of Americans at the 50th income percentile to preferences of Americans at the 90th percentile as well as major lobbying or business groups. They find that the government—whether Republican or Democratic—more often follows the preferences of the latter group rather than the first.

The researches note that this is not a new development caused by, say, recent Supreme Court decisions allowing more money in politics, such as Citizens United or this month's ruling on McCutcheon v. FEC. As the data stretching back to the 1980s suggests, this has been a long term trend, and is therefore harder for most people to perceive, let alone reverse.

"Ordinary citizens," they write, "might often be observed to 'win' (that is, to get their preferred policy outcomes) even if they had no independent effect whatsoever on policy making, if elites (with whom they often agree) actually prevail."

[ 打印 ]
閱讀 ()評論 (0)
評論
目前還沒有任何評論
登錄後才可評論.