魔鬼在細節裏。劉的律師有一句話很關鍵“女方很主動”

其它的證據都不如這一條致命。其它的都是旁證，倆人關起門來以後發生的才是關鍵。可女方很主動（acitve and willing to participant)這一條就說明了女方是自願的。但後來後悔了想要錢。 

下麵是劉強東律師的原文。劉的律師經驗豐富，對外披露的也都是經過法庭認可的內容，可信度高。律師說女方在房間裏“很主動”（女上位？），可兩個人關起門來的事情外人怎麽知道主動不主動？明顯劉的律師有了“女方很主動”的直接或者間接證據。 

那麽證據是什麽呢？大家接著開腦洞使勁挖一挖？

我想劉強東鵝別的名人一樣，對這種事情也是三不，不拒絕，不承諾，不負責。 而且以他的身份一定有暗中的防範措施。沒準進屋以後就用手機錄音／錄像，以備後用。女的如果下套，估計也會暗中錄音錄像，但錄下來的證據並不支持她起訴劉強東強奸她。反而給警方和檢方認為她是自願的。

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/21/technology/jd-com-richard-liu-rape.html

Ms. Brisbois said that the woman invited Mr. Liu into her apartment building and that “what happened in the room was entirely consensual.”

“The woman was an active and willing participant and at no time did she indicate in any way that she did not consent,” Ms. Brisbois said. 

"在房間裏發生的一切都是自願的。該女士整個過程都很主動，沒有任何不情願的表示。" 

 

明尼蘇達檢方也說沒有找到劉犯罪的證據，“it did not find enough evidence to pursue a case against Mr. Liu”。 

警察和檢方不僅沒找到證據，而且還說倆人的行為是自願的。

“As is the case in too many sexual assault incidents, it was a complicated situation,” Mike Freeman, the Hennepin County attorney, said in a statement. “It is also similar to other sexual assault cases with the suspect maintaining the sex was consensual.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/21/technology/jd-com-richard-liu-rape.html