2014 (225)
2015 (166)
2019 (69)
2021 (98)
今天早上看了網上的CBS的即時新聞，得知被檢察官指控為犯有二級謀殺罪和輕度過失殺人罪的George Zimmerman最終被評審團認定為無罪。真為他高興！！也為自己先前和先生議論此事時所判斷的此人可能會被判無罪的言論得到證實而感到沾沾自喜。Zimmerman的案子說明了一個道理：在如今動不動就拿種族，人權說事的美國，敢於冒天下之大不違，敢於站出來主持公正的人還是有的。試想，如果這次Zimmerman被判有罪，那今後還會有誰出來維護社區的治安，還會有誰會在鄰居家發生，或即將發生不幸事情時伸出援助之手。如果這次Zimmerman被判有罪，犯罪勢力無疑就會愈加的猖獗和肆無忌憚，因為沒有人會再敢和他們爭鬥。誰敢和他們鬥，一旦失手，Zimmerman的下場就是他們的結局。
對於生活在以白人為絕對大多數的美國的有色人種來說，保持自己的種族地位的穩定，堅守自己的人身權力不被踐踏是至關重要的首要任務。道理很簡單，沒有了基本的權利和地位，就等於沒有被社會承認，就要被社會所拋棄。對於這一點，我們有些亞裔人士還沒有得到應有的極其充分的認識。但是，動不動就利用種族的權力和地位來說事，做文章，就有可能會適得其反，就有可能會賊喊捉賊，就有可能會自暴自棄，就有可能會讓人不恥。
馬丁-路德-金，無疑是美國民權運動最偉大的領袖，他一生最反對的就是暴力。。。。。。沒有他，就沒有美國黑人的今天。現如今，黑人兄弟們享受最多的就是自由，使用最多的就是暴力。他們不僅早已實現了金牧師“能夠同昔日奴隸主的兒子同席而坐，親如手足”的夢想，而且時不時的還想把自己的手伸進昔日奴隸主兒子的口袋裏去，順便找些自由的錢花花。
我們城市前幾年新來了個黑人的警察局長。在他還沒上任之前，媒體采訪了一些當地的黑人社團，問問他們的想法。那些黑人幾乎都是一個口徑，說什麽以前的局長（當然是白人了）有或多或少的歧視現象，辦事不公平。現在好了，我們有了新的局長（言外之意，就是這個人是黑人，是我們自己的兄弟），我們對他寄予了很高的期望。過了沒多久，在新局長帶領他的手下辦了幾個殺人，搶劫，販毒之類的案子後（案犯都是黑人），當媒體再次采訪那些所謂的人權人士時，他們的口徑就全都來了個180度的大轉彎，說什麽新局長讓我們很失望，沒有為我們伸張權益，沒有站在正義的一邊，等等。我們市裏還發生了一個跟Zimmerman的案子很相似的事件，也是，一個黑人青年，因為夜間在市中心搶劫，和跟上來的警察發生了劇烈的互毆現象，最後被警察開槍打死了。黑人團體集體抗議，說是種族歧視，皆因那個開槍的是白人（當然，我有時也想，我是說有時，白人警察對待白人案犯就是和對待有色人種案犯不一樣，究竟為什麽？這可能就要從“行為科學”中去尋找答案了）。以前的公司裏雇了一個黑女人，她經常非常自豪的講她如何訴了二個她曾經工作過的公司。後來，她還是很快就被這個公司解雇了，原因是，她想被升職為主任，不接受公司給她的職位，所以就不好好幹。
其實，工作中的我和我的黑人同事都相處得非常好，甚至還和一個比我大一旬的黑人老大哥無話不談。但是，事實就是事實，是不能用個人感情來替代的。我憎恨的不是和我一起工作的同事，而是那些犯下了傷天害禮之事的違法之徒。
“如果國家依然我行我素，那些希望黑人隻需出口氣就會心滿意足的人將大失所望。在黑人得到公民權之前，美國既不會安寧，也不會平靜。”。。。。。。金牧師如是說。如今，五十年已經過去了，黑人兄弟們也早已得到了他們往日夢寐以求的權利和平等（還不平等嗎？連總統都是African American了,還要怎樣的“更加”呢？！別忘了，這裏是黑人隻占12.85%的美國，而不是黑人比例占99.99%以上的非洲大陸。這個結果是金牧師做夢也想不到的）。可是，美國安寧了嗎？平靜了嗎？答案隻有您自己最清楚。希望這個社會再多幾個像George Zimmerman那樣的即勇敢又有公益心的人，那樣，這個美國才將會成為一個真正意義上的安寧之地。
O8 這次真的錯誤地使用了他的政治權力，使得一些媒體甚至檢查院都有失公正。很
高興看到判決的公正
死了已經死了，活著的黑哥們為什麽沒有一個人站出來說：TM不應該先使用暴力。為什麽不呼籲自己族群避免暴力示威？為什麽什麽一粘黑哥，就發展成暴力，一分析原因，就抱怨貧窮，教育水平差，在一分析，就他媽的提黑哥的爺爺奶奶們被白人操過，奴役過，從黑非洲賣過來？？？
是一開始的時候陪審員有分歧。有陪審員成心要證明Zimmerman 有罪。但是在檢查證據和法律條文很多遍後，還是無法證明Zimmerman有任何罪。最後無罪的判決還是6人一致做出的。
陪審員相信：
開槍前的呼救聲是Zimmerman的。
Zimmerman受到了生命威脅。
陪審員沒有考慮膚色和種族：
樓下的xwenxuecityy 是不是當年的4級都沒過？
Juror B37 said that if Zimmerman was guilty of anything, "he was guilty of not using good judgment." She also said that he called 911 from the car and he should not have gotten out of the car.
This well spoken juror conveyed that she thinks that Zimmerman got in way over his head and she believes he shouldn't have been there, but she also believes Martin threw the first punch. She said she thinks Martin wasn't going to let Zimmerman think he could scare him and she "thinks Trayvon got mad and attacked him."
It was apparent to Juror B37 that it was Zimmerman's voice heard on the tape screaming for help because he felt his life was in danger. This was before he shot Martin. The juror said:
"He had a right to defend himself," she said. "If he felt threatened that his life was going to be taken away from him, or he was going to have bodily harm, he had a right."
The initial vote was divided, Juror B37 shared with Cooper. At first three of the jurors voted Zimmerman was guilty and the other three jurors voted that Zimmerman was not- guilty. Juror B37 said that she was one of the people on the jury that believed he was not guilty from the get go.
"There was a couple of them in there that wanted to find him guilty of something and after hours and hours and hours of deliberating over the law, and reading it over and over and over again, we decided there's just no way, other place to go." she said.
It sounds as if the jury gave it more than their all, especially if a "couple of jurors" wanted to find him guilty of something. They read the laws that govern the charges and they just couldn't make one stick under the circumstances. This is why Zimmerman was acquitted of all charges.
It wasn't the color of Trayvon's skin that made Zimmerman suspicious, it was the way Trayvon was acting. She does not believe that Zimmerman profiled Trayvon. She went on to say how Trayvon's actions looked suspicious to George:
"Anybody would think anybody walking down the road, stopping and turning and looking -- if that's exactly what happened -- is suspicious," she said.
"I think all of us thought race did not play a role," the juror said . "We never had that discussion."
There you have it, the race discussion never came up because the six jurors didn't believe that was an issue in this case. Juror B37, who was planning to write a book about this experience, sounded as if she started to cry towards the end of the interview as her voice cracked when she said:
"It's a tragedy this happened. But it happened, And I think both were responsible for the situation they had gotten themselves into. I think both of them could have walked away. It just didn't happen."
Just hours after the interview was over, Jury B36 literary agent, Sharlene Martin, released a statement from Juror B37 saying she would no longer write a book.
你是城裏人，和我爭執就是對我們鄉下人的不敬。vise versa
你是北方人，就是對我們南方人的不敬。vise versa
你覺得你該挨揍？如果挨揍，你有沒有權力自衛？想通這個問題就明白這個案子了。
沈成涵 評論於：2013-07-16 05:22:43 [回複評論]
--“希望這個社會再多幾個像George Zimmerman那樣的即勇敢又有公益心的人，那樣，這個美國才將會成為一個真正意義上的安寧之地。”
滿街都是Zimmerman這樣沒有警察的資質（沒培訓、沒考試）的業餘聯防隊員，美國還是自由社會嗎？隻會是自以為是者的天堂。
滿街都是Zimmerman這樣沒有警察的資質（沒培訓、沒考試）的業餘聯防隊員，美國還是自由社會嗎？隻會是自以為是者的天堂。
另外我很喜歡我冇醉的文章，在這裏像大家推薦一下。
kybluegrass 評論於：2013-07-15 13:50:24 [回複評論]
回複Rock.rose的評論:
As far as I know, so called "細節" only came from Zimmerman's mouth.
As far as I know, so called "細節" only came from Zimmerman's mouth.
對這個案件稍加注意的人都會了解這些細節的。如果你不相信證據，那是你自己的問題。不能說法律不公正。
HOW DO YOU KNOW THE DETAILS?
現在沒人再講：
大使之死
IRS
醫保
監聽
埃及
O8當真高明！！！！！！！
What about the part when he struck Zimmerman, knocking Zimmerman down, and then sat on top of Zimmerman and began punching Zimmerman "MMA style," bashing Zimmerman's head against the concrete, saying "shut the f*** up," putting his hand over Zimmerman's nose and mouth, reaching for Zimmerman's gun, and saying "you are going to die tonight motherf*****"?
Is that what you do when you visit people?