ChineseAchilles的博客
曆史，人文的海外隨想
正文
基本和大清是一個路數，沒有戰鬥力就開始胡吹，到處炫耀，大清還是有點戰鬥力的，這個航母在飛機著艦技術不成熟時，就搞調成軍，軍委主席白排場，大事宣傳，航母要是沒飛機是個擺樣子的靶船，所謂會咬的狗不叫，可見高層的策劃就是一幫退化的老頭，還要去和老美叫板，看了讓人一身汗。。。
著艦的那位是特技飛行大隊的尖子，其他的水平可想而知，像這種水平的，二戰時，日本人沒有上千也有幾百，美國人就更不計其數了，可見吹了半天差距有多大，就像國內吹得最高水平，最高大獎也就是這邊一個合格生而已。。。嗬嗬。。。繼續吹吧，吹得自己不知道是誰時，大概就是甲午再現時了。。。
你不是說老美從47年到如今都是手控操作降落嗎？
現代飛機使用電操控製係統，飛機的操縱是飛行員通過操縱杆給出信號，電腦控製機械。所以加自動著陸功能很容易。老弟可能是文科學生，不知道這些東東。
情緒化了不是，樓主趕緊來刪YY的帖 :-)
pls stick to business.
Autonomous landing on a carrier is nothing new, though so far there’s always a pilot sitting in the airplane to take over when the system is pushed to the limit. Carrier based aircraft have used auto land capabilities since the late 1950s when the automatic carrier landing system (ACLS) was developed. The ACLS uses an aircraft’s autopilot, coupled to the instruments a pilot would normally use to land on a carrier to guide an airplane to the carrier deck. ACLS can take an aircraft all the way to touchdown, though most pilots prefer to make the landing themselves.
Where the real challenge is for automated landing systems is getting the aircraft the final few feet to the carrier deck when the weather is less than ideal. The ACLS can fly an airplane to the aircraft carrier in stormy conditions, but those final few seconds to touchdown can be a real challenge when the deck is pitching and rolling in the swells. This is what pilots say is the single biggest challenge of flying from an aircraft carrier. Developing the autonomous recovery capabilities for all weather conditions is going to be one of the biggest challenges facing the X-47B team.
As background, ACLS provided by BELL has been installed to 5+ US carriers.
Well, that is why I have the impression that the pilot would rather place the fate on their own hands instead of on ACLS, at least currently.
http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/military/read.main/8819/
Carriers are fitted with the Automatic Carrier Landing System which allow certain aircraft to be "auto-landed" onto the carrier. Not all carrier aircraft can use the system however. Whether it's popular with the aircrews is another matter. (I don't think it is.)
F-14s aren't equipped with ACLS (I don't think).
F-18s are.
Otherwise landings are all done visually day and night without any automatics.
There are flight deck lights and the drop line lights to help the pilot land onboard. If the carrier is operating close to friendly land, the returning aircraft have an option to divert to land, otherwise the carrier is the only place to land and the pilots just keep trying and trying until they get back onboard.
The fun part is when they turn out the flight deck lights, try landing with NVGs Smile I think helo pilots have it harder when they are using NVGs to land. Try putting a helo onto a pitching flight deck 100ft x 35ft wide with no lights at night. You realize very quickly how important peripheral vision is in trying to land. You're missing a lot of visual cues that you have during the day. There is no equivalent automatic landing system for helicopters.
Cheers Smile
Woodreau / KMVL
可是他們很謙虛，從1946到2012還在用人來控製戰機在航母上降落，一點也不吹噓說能夠自動降落。
心中斬鬼，應該向他們學習。
遼寧號之所以今天才實現飛機起落，我想主要是根據航母測試規劃的進度，是時間上的按排，並非是技術上有多難。現在國內做點事就吹，從總理，到百姓都是如此。
咋啦？