浪淘沙 蒹葭 自注

別去見蒹葭, 煙籠寒沙. 蒼蒼在水日西斜. 周德久違秦暴戾, 枯噪藤鴉. 詩禮可傳家, 洗卻鉛華. 茫然四顧學無涯. 歸鶴千年歸一歎, 柳絮楊花 "蒹葭蒼蒼，白露為霜。所謂伊人，在水一方。... ..." 蒹葭是詩經秦風的名篇, 漢儒認為孔子采編此詩的用意是:"蒹葭之草蒼蒼然雖盛， 未堪家用，必待白露凝戾為霜，然後堅實中用，歲事得成，以興秦國之民雖眾，而 未順德教，必待周禮以教之，然後服從上命，國乃得興。今襄公未能用周禮，其國 未得興也." 秦為西周故地, 而未能用周禮; 中國是孔孟之鄉, 而五四以來"打倒孔 家店", 實為病急亂投醫也.

[子雲亭客]

謝博兄點評!

同意你的說法,立新不必非得破舊

[博弈]

YOUR POEMS ARE MATURE POETRY WITH DEEP THOUGHTS, LIKE THEM MUCH!
THANK YOU!

ONE COMMENT (NO CHINESE INTERFACE, SO EXCUSE MY USING ENGLISH.)

YOU MENTIONED 中國是孔孟之鄉, 而五四以來"打倒孔家店", 實為病急亂投醫也.
中國是孔孟之鄉 EXACTLY, TOTALLY AGREED.

"打倒孔家店", 實為病急亂投醫也. IS CORRECT.
(IT WAS A GREAT LOSS OF CULTURE AND VIRTUE.)

BUT 而五四以來"打倒孔家店", IS NOT SO CORRECT.

THIS IS PROBABLY ONLY THE SAYING AND HAPPENINGS IN MAINLAND CHINA IN THAT ERA.

DURING THE SAME TIME IN OTHER PLACES LIKE SINGAPORE, HONG-KONG, TAIWAN AND U.S. THAT I KNOW, THERE WAS NEVER AN EQUAL SIGN OR INFERENCE OF "五四" AND "打倒孔家店".

TO THE CONTRAY, CHINESE IN THESE PLACES HAD BEEN, HAVE BEEN
PROMOTING 孔, WEN-YAN-WEN AND BAI-HUA AT THE SAME TIME,
WHILE MAINLAND CHINA WAS BEATING 孔家店:) FOR POLITICAL REASONS.

GRANTED 五四 AND "打倒孔家店" MOVEMENT OCCURED CHRONOLOGICALLY,
BUT IT WAS NOT A DIRECT INFERENCE, I THINK.

I THINK THE OLD NEEDS TO BE PRESERVED AND STUDIED,
THE NEW NEEDS TO BE FURTHER DEVELOPED.
THERE IS NO CONFLICT IN MY MIND.
THE NEW NEEDS TO DRAW NUTRITION FROM THE OLD.

THIS IS MY UNDERSATNDING.