Hillary Clinton, the US secretary of state, has called for greater freedom of speech online and said that internet companies, such as Google, should refuse to support “politically-motivated censorship”.Of course, it was never likely that she would come down in favour of politically-motivated censorship and against free speech. Furthermore, there was little in Mrs Clinton’s speech at the Newseum journalism museum in Washington DC to suggest any action would be taken against repressive regimes.She called on the Chinese authorities to investigate the alleged cyber-attacks on Google and warned that countries restricting access to online information risk “walling themselves off from the progress of the next century”.China is just one of the 12 “enemies of the internet” identified last year by press freedom campaigners Reporters Without Borders. The others are Saudi Arabia, Burma, Cuba, Egypt, Iran, North Korea, Syria, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Vietnam.Mrs Clinton singled out several of those countries, including Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Tunisia, for criticism in her speech, highlighting the growing censorship of the internet by repressive regimes.
Reporters Without Borders also placed several countries “under surveillance” for using draconian measures to control freedom of expression online. Those countries are Australia, Bahrain, Belarus, Eritrea, Malaysia, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Thailand, The United Arab Emirates, Yemen and Zimbabwe.Fortunately in most of these countries methods for circumventing government censorship are widely know and many people use internet cafes to do so. Still, that’s far from an ideal situation.What can be done beyond calling on these countries to end their restriction of free speech? Perhaps Hillary Clinton could use America’s position as major trading partners with some of these countries to put pressure on their governments? Or, I suppose, she could just carry on delivering empty speeches.The internet in general, and the worldwide web in particular, were set up with noble aims about freedom of information and free speech. Inevitably, these principles are being thwarted by countries which have little respect for them – a situation which Hillary Clinton’s blandishments are unlikely to change.
今天是本人對文學城網站(http://www.wenxuecity.com/)即將采取正式行動前的最後一天,本人嚴正要求:
1 - 貴網站無條件恢複我"維梁"博客的一切功能,包括向論壇發稿、回複、悄悄話等的一切功能。
2 - 貴網站向自己文壇、愛壇、雜壇等處發簡文,通告維梁博客的重新開通,如此則本人可以考慮不再公開追究和討論此事。
3 - 貴方整頓內部紀律,禁止在站內頻繁和大規模使用WEB CENCORSHIP
否則,我們將就"維梁博客"因發表一篇談論GOOGLE WEB CENCORSHIP事件的文章,和另一篇談論6、4的文章後,立即遭受貴網站封殺ID和IP(所有用過的電腦)的不公對待的事件, 以及連同其他眾多新舊網友們控訴你們:受中國國內資本和機構操控,在美國本土的華人媒體社區內大搞WEB CENCORSHIP、剝奪言論自由、剝奪信仰自由、信仰歧視、思想政治洗腦、網絡恐怖、和專製意識心態輸出等違憲違法行為,而采取一係列的正當行動。包括但不限於:
1 - 向美國國務卿希拉麗辦公室投訴: WEB CENCORSHIP不僅僅存在於中國本土,更在美國的華人社區內肆虐。
LINK: http://www.state.gov/secretary/
2 - 向美國國土防衛部投訴: 美國本土的WEB CENCORSHIP使華人無法享受到應有的人權和自由,這些都是本該在自由國度享有的神聖權利。
LINK:http://www.dhs.gov/xabout/structure/editorial_0373.shtm
3 - 向美國國會人權委員會投訴: 有人正在外國勢力的支持和操縱下,有係統、有組織、有計劃和有目的地控製著生活在美國的講華語人群的精神和思想,正在和已經剝奪了他們的基本權利:信仰自由、輿論自由和政治自由,使他們在自己的文化社區中生活在專製和恐怖之下。
4 - 在知情官員和議員的陪同下,向中國大使館就此事遞交抗議幹涉美國內部事務。
5 - 促請召開議會討論此一性質惡劣的事件。
6 - 恕不一一奉告
限定貴方在一月二十二日下午3時前做答複,否則視同拒絕本人的正當要求,並準備承擔一起責任和後果。
另外,誰再刪我貼將成為呈堂證據!!!
一個同時熱愛中國和美國的中國人。