insight

工程技術,地產投資,信仰家園,時尚生活
個人資料
正文

六大猶太傳媒公司控製全球96%的媒體

(2014-01-12 09:46:16) 下一個
譯:檀樂平shine

一 迪斯尼集團

迪斯尼堪稱全球頂級傳媒巨頭,它的董事會主席兼CEO名叫Michael Eisner,是個猶太人。一位媒體分析家曾說,迪斯尼帝國的老板是一個“控製狂人”。他控製著若幹個電視製作公司:沃爾特•迪斯尼電視台、Touchstone電視台、Buena Vista電視台。迪斯尼的電視台擁有1400萬付費用戶。

在電影方麵,迪斯尼影業集團的老板Joe Roth也是猶太人,旗下擁有Touchstone影業、好萊塢影業和Caravan影業。迪斯尼集團還擁有Miramax電影公司,由Weinstein兄弟負責管理。

1984年被Eisner接管之前,迪斯尼集團一直在非猶太人的迪斯尼家族的管理之下,那時候它的形象清新健康,是家庭娛樂的首選。而現在,雖然它依然擁有白雪公主等卡通形象的版權,但風格卻日趨色情和暴力。除此之外,迪斯尼集團在美國境內設立了225個分支機構,還部分持有一些歐洲電視公司的股權。

二 美國廣播公司(ABC)

ABC集團的有線電視分公司ESPN,其主席兼CEO是Steven Bornstein,猶太人。他的公司同時控股Lifetime電視台和Arts & Entertainment有線傳媒公司。ABC無線廣播公司在紐約、華盛頓和洛杉磯等主要城市擁有11個AM廣播站和10個FM廣播站,同時設有3400多個分支機構。盡管以廣播公司起家,ABC在出版業亦取得了不俗的成就,1994年在該領域獲得了10億美元的收入。它擁有七家日報社、Fairchild出版公司、Chilton出版公司,以及Diversified出版集團。

三 時代華納

全球第二大傳媒公司時代華納,其董事會主席兼CEO Gerald Levin是猶太人。時代華納的分公司HBO是全美最大的付費電視網。華納音樂是全球最大的唱片公司,旗下有50個品牌,其中最大的就是Danny Goldberg領導的華納兄弟唱片公司,他和Warnervision(華納video製作分公司)的老大Stuart Hersch一樣,都是猶太人。華納音樂推廣了蘊含暴力的“岡斯特說唱音樂”,通過與環球唱片公司的合作,推廣了別具一格的歌詞風格,鼓勵黑人對白人的暴力行為。

除了有線電視和音樂之外,華納在電影(華納兄弟製片廠)和出版方麵也頗有成就。華納出版方麵的總編Norman

Pearlstine就是猶太人,他領導著美國最大的雜誌出版公司,旗下的雜誌包括《時代周刊》、《體育畫報》、《人物》和《財富》。

四 CBS(哥倫比亞廣播公司)

1985年,一位非猶太人Ted Turner提出收購CBS,此舉震驚了美國新聞界。Turner以廣告業起家,後來創辦了一個新興的有線電視網絡,名字叫作CNN。

盡管Turner的CNN啟用了很多猶太高管,Turner本人是一位具有完善自我和堅強性格的傑出領袖,從未有過損害猶太群體利益的行為。但CBS主席William Paley(本姓Palinsky,猶太人)和董事會的一些猶太高管集體認為,Turner是個難以控製的人,他們害怕他將來有可能倒戈相向。Turner的前雇員Daniel Schorr(猶太人)則公開指責前老板曾有厭惡猶太人的情緒。

為了阻止Turner,CBS高層邀請猶太富豪Laurence Tisch充當白騎士,搶先進行善意收購。Laurence Tisch此前已經擁有劇院、旅館、保險公司、香煙製造等多個產業,現在他又擁有了CBS。他從1986年到1995年一直擔任CBS董事長兼CEO,努力將一切反猶輿論消滅於無形之中。

Turner還想做最後的努力,這回阻止他的是時代華納。時代華納擁有CBS 20%的股票,在所有重大事務上都有決定權。

五 Viacom

Viacom是美國第三大傳媒公司,年收入100億美元。它的老板是Sumner Redstone,原名Murray Rothstein,猶太人。Viacom為全美最大的三家電視網絡製作節目,旗下擁有12個電視台和12個廣播電台。Viacom還收購了派拉蒙電影公司,後者的女老板Sherry Lansing也是猶太人。

在出版方麵,Viacom擁有Prentice Hall,Simon & Schuster以及Pocket Books三家出版社。它還擁有四千多家Blockbuster音像製品連鎖店。

Viacom因其製作的有線電視節目而廣受讚譽,包括Showtime, MTV, Nickelodeon等等。從1989年開始,MTV,和Nickelodeon就在年輕觀眾中占據了龐大的市場份額。

猶太人壟斷了全美前三位的媒體公司,如果說這裏麵沒有蓄意的成分,那就是自欺欺人了。(注:不大明白作者依據的是哪個排名,根據2009年的最新表單,時代華納、迪斯尼和Viacom分別排名一、三、四位,排第二的是Vivendi,索尼第六,新聞集團其實排在第七位)

那麽,其他的媒體公司情況如何呢?排第四位的是魯伯特•默多克的新聞集團,默多克不是猶太人,但他的全球電影和電視業務主管Peter Chermin卻是的。排第五位的索尼,索尼是一家日本公司,但它的美國分公司老板Michael Schulhof是猶太人,索尼影業的主管Alan Levine也是猶太人。

電影業

那些未被大型集團收購的電視台和電影公司,大部分也處在猶太人控製之下。例如被影評家稱為“美國獨立電視先鋒”的新世界傳媒公司,其老板Ronald Perelman就是個猶太人。

最出名的小規模電影公司當推Dreamworks SKG(注:拍了很多好電影的Dreamworks!),它其實是一個徹頭徹尾的猶太企業。1994年,唱片業巨頭David Geffen,迪斯尼前高管Jeffrey Katzenberg,以及著名導演斯蒂芬•斯皮爾伯格,參照好萊塢大片場的模式建立了這家電影公司——這三個統統都是猶太人!現在Dreamworks不僅拍電影,還拍攝電視劇、動畫片,灌錄唱片等等,實現了多元化發展。

好萊塢的兩家大型製片公司:MCA和Universal(經常看好萊塢大片的朋友應該很熟悉了),屬於同一個大型集團Seagram,Seagram的董事長兼CEO名叫Edgar Bronfman Jr.,他不僅是猶太人,還是世界猶太人代表大會的主席。

眾所周知,20世紀早期電影剛開始發展時,猶太人就控製了電影業全部的製作和發行渠道,這種情況直到現在也沒有改變。根據1995年的統計,迪斯尼、華納兄弟、索尼影業、派拉蒙(屬於Viacom)、Universal(屬於Seagram)這五家製作的電影,占據了全球74%的票房。

電視新聞

在電視方麵,美國的三大電視網絡巨頭ABC、CBS和NBC,現在隨著傳媒界的合並,這三家已經不是完全獨立的公司了。當它們彼此獨立時,每一家都被猶太人控製著:ABC是Leonard Goldenson,CBS先是William Paley,然後是Lawrence Tisch;NBC先是David Sarnoff,然後是他兒子Robert。在過去的數十年裏,這些電視台從高層到普通職員都被猶太人占據著。當它們逐漸合並,融入其他公司之後,這種情況依然沒有改變。電視新聞受猶太人的影響仍然極其大。

我們知道,ABC電視台現在已經部分被迪斯尼收購,它的新聞部門裏所有的執行製片人都是猶太人,包括:Victor Neufeld(20-20欄目)、Bob Reichbloom(早安美國)、Rick Kaplan(晚間新聞播報)。

CBS最近被西屋電氣公司收購了,然而當初Tisch任命的新聞主管Eric Ober仍然大權在握,當然,他是個猶太人。NBC現在被通用電氣收購了,它的新聞主管Andrew Lack是猶太人,幾位執行製片人(今日新聞的Jeff Zucker、NBC晚間新聞的Jeff Gralnick、國際新聞的Neal Shapiro)也都是猶太人。

Newhouse家族的傳媒帝國

日報是最普遍的新聞傳播方式,每天美國人要購買6千萬份日報(假定人們都會閱讀自己買的報紙吧)。這6千萬份報紙來自1500家不同的報社,大家可能會覺得,這麽多的報社,應該不會都被猶太人控製。但事實並非如此,這1500家報社並不互相獨立,彼此的競爭也很少,更不像大家以為的那樣代表大眾的利益。每個城市甚至每個小鎮都有地區性報紙的日子一去不複返了。現在,大部分地區性報紙都被或大或小的公司控製著,離真正的幕後老板幾千英裏遠。據統計,全美隻有25%的報紙是獨立運營的,其他都屬於大型新聞集團。隻有少數幾家大報社有跨地區采訪能力,其他的報紙都依賴於從這幾家轉載國內和國際新聞。

猶太人Newhouse兄弟(Samuel和Donald)擁有的Newhouse帝國(注,應該是Advance Publications)完美地詮釋了美國日報業是多麽缺乏競爭,從中我們可以看出猶太人對輿論的控製達到何等程度。Newhouse擁有26家日報社,其中包括美國最重要的幾家日報:Cleveland Plain Dealer、the Newark Star-Ledger、以及the New Orleans Times-Picayune。它還擁有最大的圖書出版公司Random House及其分支機構(注:我覺得Random House是貝塔斯曼的吧…… 查了一下,Advance 1980年收購的是Random House的美國分公司,然而兩者的所有權很混亂,待查)。

Newhouse廣播公司擁有12家電視台和87套有線電視網絡,包括一些最重要的電視網(注:我記得Newhouse家族好像還部分控股Discovery?)。

雜誌和期刊方麵,Newhouse旗下的周刊Sunday supplement Parade每周發行2200萬份。Newhouse家族的全資公司Conde Nast group總共發行了幾十種期刊,包括發行量極大的the New Yorker,Vogue,Madmoiselle,Glamour,Vanity Fair,Bride’s,Gentlemen’s Quarterly,Self,House & Garden等。

Newhouse傳媒帝國的建立者是已故的老Samuel Newhouse,他是來自俄國的猶太移民。Newhouse的報紙和雜誌發行量很大,他們的主要收入來源於廣告,而不是讀者。那些大公司做廣告的時候,一旦選擇了一家刊物就不會輕易更換,Newhouse於是漸漸排擠掉了所有的競爭對手,在傳媒界一枝獨秀。

三家猶太人的報紙

從20世紀初開始,猶太人就成了美國經濟的決定性力量。與此同時,他們也控製了越來越多的美國報紙。非猶太人的報紙難以生存,其中最大的原因就是報紙的主要經濟來源是大公司的版麵廣告,而很多大公司都被猶太人控製。即便是那些非猶太人開辦的報紙,在選擇報道新聞時也要考慮到猶太人的利益。這就是所謂的拿人錢財,替人消災。

通過減少競爭,建立壟斷,猶太人逐漸控製了美國的輿論,這一點可以從最權威最有影響力的三大報紙體現出來,即《紐約時報》、《華爾街日報》和《華盛頓郵報》。這三家報紙控製著美國的財經和政治輿論導向,影響著其他所有報紙。它們決定了哪些信息算作“新聞”,哪些不算。它們是信息的原始來源,其他報紙都在抄襲它們的文章。——而這三家報紙,都控製在猶太人手中。

《紐約時報》由兩位非猶太人在1851年建立,然而他們去世後,1896年,猶太大亨Adolph Ochs收購了這家報紙。現在他的外孫Arthur Ochs Sulzberger,Jr.是《紐約時報》的CEO。執行總編Max Frankel和總編Joseph Lelyveld也都是猶太人。Sulzberger家族還擁有另外的33家報紙(包括《波士頓環球》)、12家雜誌、7家電台電視台、1個有線電視網和3家圖書出版公司。《紐約時報》新聞社同時向506家其他媒體提供新聞通稿和圖片。

《華盛頓郵報》的王牌是它遍布在各大政府機關中的內線,使它總是能得到第一手的非公開信息。跟紐約時報一樣,《華盛頓郵報》也由非猶太人建立,它建立於1877年。1933年6月,它在大蕭條中破產,猶太銀行家Eugene Meyer將之收購。現在經營這家報紙的是Meyer的女兒Katherine Meyer Graham。

《華爾街日報》每日的發行量高達180萬份,是美國發行量最大的日報。它隸屬於道瓊斯公司。道瓊斯公司的CEO是Peter Kann,猶太人。他同時兼任《華爾街日報》主管。

Facts of Jewish Media Control Electronic News & Entertainment Media

The largest media conglomerate today is Walt Disney Company, whose chairman and CEO, Michael Eisner, is a Jew. The Disney Empire, headed by a man described by one media analyst as a “control freak”, includes several television production companies (Walt Disney Television, Touchstone Television, Buena Vista Television), its own cable network with 14 million subscribers, and two video production companies.

As for feature films, the Walt Disney Picture Group, headed by Joe Roth (also a Jew), includes Touchstone Pictures, Hollywood Pictures, and Caravan Pictures. Disney also owns Miramax Films, run by the Weinstein brothers. When the Disney Company was run by the Gentile Disney family prior to its takeover by Eisner in 1984, it epitomized wholesome, family entertainment. While it still holds the rights to Snow White, under Eisner, the company has expanded into the production of graphic sex and violence. In addition, it has 225 affiliated stations in the United States and is part owner of several European TV companies.

ABC’s cable subsidiary, ESPN, is headed by president and CEO Steven Bornstein, a Jew. This corporation also has a controlling share of Lifetime Television and the Arts & Entertainment Network cable companies. ABC Radio Network owns eleven AM and ten FM stations, again in major cities such as New York, Washington, Los Angeles, and has over 3,400 affiliates. Although primarily a telecommunications company, Capital Cities/ABC earned over $1 billion in publishing in 1994. It owns seven daily newspapers, Fairchild Publications, Chilton Publications, and the Diversified Publishing Group. Time Warner, Inc, is the second of the international media leviathans. The chairman of the board and CEO, Gerald Levin, is a Jew. Time Warner’s subsidiary HBO is the country’s largest pay-TV cable network. Warner Music is by far the world’s largest record company, with 50 labels, the biggest of which is Warner Brothers Records, headed by Danny Goldberg. Stuart Hersch is president of Warnervision, Warner Music’s video production unit. Goldberg and Hersch are Jews. Warner Music was an early promoter of “gangsta rap.” Through its involvement with Interscope Records, it helped popularize a genre whose graphic lyrics explicitly urge Blacks to commit acts of violence against Whites. In addition to cable and music, Time Warner is heavily involved in the production of feature films (Warner Brothers Studio) and publishing. Time Warner’s publishing division (editor-in-chief Norman Pearlstine, a Jew) is the largest magazine publisher in the country (Time, Sports Illustrated, People, Fortune).

When Ted Turner, a Gentile, made a bid to buy CBS in 1985, there was panic in media boardrooms across the nation. Turner made a fortune in advertising and then had built a successful cable-TV news network, CNN. Although Turner employed a number of Jews in key executive positions in CNN and had never taken public positions contrary to Jewish interests, he is a man with a large ego and a strong personality and was regarded by Chairman William Paley (real name Palinsky, a Jew) and the other Jews at CBS as uncontrollable: a loose cannon who might at some time in the future turn against them. Furthermore, Jewish newsman Daniel Schorr, who had worked for Turner, publicly charged that his former boss held a personal dislike for Jews. To block Turner’s bid, CBS executives invited billionaire Jewish theater, hotel, insurance, and cigarette magnate Laurence Tisch to launch a “friendly” takeover of the company, and from 1986 till 1995 Tisch was the chairman and CEO of CBS, removing any threat of non-Jewish influence there. Subsequent efforts by Turner to acquire a major network have been obstructed by Levin’s Time Warner, which owns nearly 20 percent of CBS stock and has veto power over major deals. Viacom, Inc, headed by Sumner Redstone (born Murray Rothstein), a Jew, is the third largest megamedia corporation in the country, with revenues of over $10 billion a year.

Viacom, which produces and distributes TV programs for the three largest networks, owns 12 television stations and 12 radio stations. It produces feature films through Paramount Pictures, headed by Jewess Sherry Lansing. Its publishing division includes Prentice Hall, Simon & Schuster, and Pocket Books. It distributes videos through over 4,000 Blockbuster stores. Viacom’s chief claim to fame, however, is as the world’s largest provider of cable programming, through its Showtime, MTV, Nickelodeon, and other networks. Since 1989, MTV and Nickelodeon have acquired larger and larger shares of the younger television audience. With the top three, and by far the largest, media companies in the hand of Jews, it is difficult to believe that such an overwhelming degree of control came about without a deliberate, concerted effort on their part. What about the other big media companies?

Number four on the list is Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation, which owns Fox Television and 20th Century Fox Films. Murdoch is a Gentile, but Peter Chermin, who heads Murdoch’s film studio and also oversees his TV production, is a Jew. Number five is the Japanese Sony Corporation, whose U.S. subsidiary, Sony Corporation of America, is run by Michael Schulhof, a Jew. Alan Levine, another Jew, heads the Sony Pictures division.

Most of the television and movie production companies that are not owned by the largest corporations are also controlled by Jews. For example, New World Entertainment, proclaimed by one media analyst as “the premiere independent TV program producer in the United States,” is owned by Ronald Perelman, a Jew. The best known of the smaller media companies, Dreamworks SKG, is a strictly kosher affair. Dream Works was formed in 1994 amid great media hype by recording industry mogul David Geffen, former Disney Pictures chairman Jeffrey Katzenberg, and film director Steven Spielberg, all three of whom are Jews. The company produces movies, animated films, television programs, and recorded music. Two other large production companies, MCA and Universal Pictures, are both owned by Seagram Company, Ltd. The president and CEO of Seagram, the liquor giant, is Edgar Bronfman Jr., who is also president of the World Jewish Congress.

It is well known that Jews have controlled the production and distribution of films since the inception of the movie industry in the early decades of the 20th century. This is still the case today. Films produced by just the five largest motion picture companies mentioned above-Disney, Warner Brothers, Sony, Paramount (Viacom), and Universal (Seagram)-accounted for 74 per cent of the total box-office receipts for the first eight months of 1995. The big three in television network broadcasting used to be ABC, CBS, and NBC. With the consolidation of the media empires, these three are no longer independent entities. While they were independent, however, each was controlled by a Jew since its inception: ABC by Leonard Goldenson, CBS first by William Paley and then by Lawrence Tisch, and NBC first by David Sarnoff and then by his son Robert.

Over periods of several decades, these networks were staffed from top to bottom with Jews, and the essential Jewishness of network television did not change when the networks were absorbed by other corporations. The Jewish presence in television news remains particularly strong. As noted, ABC is part of Eisner’s Disney Company, and the executive producers of ABC’s news programs are all Jews: Victor Neufeld (20-20), Bob Reichbloom (Good Morning America), and Rick Kaplan (World News Tonight). CBS was recently purchased by Westinghouse Electric Corporation. Nevertheless, the man appointed by Lawrence Tisch, Eric Ober, remains president of CBS News, and Ober is a Jew.

At NBC, now owned by General Electric, NBC News president Andrew Lack is a Jew, as are executive producers Jeff Zucker (Today), Jeff Gralnick (NBC Nightly News), and Neal Shapiro (Dateline). The Print Media After television news, daily newspapers are the most influential information medium in America. Sixty million of them are sold (and presumably read) each day. These millions are divided among some 1,500 different publications.

One might conclude that the sheer number of different newspapers across America would provide a safeguard against Jewish control and distortion. However, this is not the case. There is less independence, less competition, and much less representation of our interests than a casual observer would think. The days when most cities and even towns had several independently owned newspapers published by local people with close ties to the community are gone.

Today, most “local” newspapers are owned by a rather small number of large companies controlled by executives who live and work hundreds or ever thousands of miles away. The fact is that only about 25 per cent of the country’s 1,500 papers are independently owned; the rest belong to multi-newspaper chains. Only a handful are large enough to maintain independent reporting staffs outside their own communities; the rest depend on these few for all of their national and international news.

The Newhouse empire of Jewish brothers Samuel and Donald Newhouse provides an example of more than the lack of real competition among America’s daily newspapers: it also illustrates the insatiable appetite Jews have shown for all the organs of opinion control on which they could fasten their grip. The Newhouses own 26 daily newspapers, including several large and important ones, such as the Cleveland Plain Dealer, the Newark Star-Ledger, and the New Orleans Times-Picayune; the nation’s largest trade book publishing conglomerate, Random House, with all its subsidiaries; Newhouse Broadcasting, consisting of 12 television broadcasting stations and 87 cable-TV systems, including some of the country’s largest cable networks; the Sunday supplement Parade, with a circulation of more than 22 million copies per week; some two dozen major magazines, including the New Yorker, Vogue, Madmoiselle, Glamour, Vanity Fair, Bride’s, Gentlemen’s Quarterly, Self, House & Garden, and all the other magazines of the wholly owned Conde Nast group. This Jewish media empire was founded by the late Samuel Newhouse, an immigrant from Russia. The gobbling up of so many newspapers by the Newhouse family was in large degree made possible by the fact that newspapers are not supported by their subscribers, but by their advertisers. It is advertising revenue–not the small change collected from a newspaper’s readers–that largely pays the editor’s salary and yields the owner’s profit.

Whenever the large advertisers in a city choose to favor one newspaper over another with their business, the favored newspaper will flourish while its competitor dies. Since the beginning of the 20th century, when Jewish mercantile power in America became a dominant economic force, there has been a steady rise in the number of American newspapers in Jewish hands, accompanied by a steady decline in the number of competing Gentile newspapers–primarily as a result of selective advertising policies by Jewish merchants. Furthermore, even those newspapers still under Gentile ownership and management are so thoroughly dependent upon Jewish advertising revenue that their editorial and news reporting policies are largely constrained by Jewish likes and dislikes. It holds true in the newspaper business as elsewhere that he who pays the piper calls the tune.

Three Jewish Newspapers

The suppression of competition and the establishment of local monopolies on the dissemination of news and opinion have characterized the rise of Jewish control over America’s newspapers. The resulting ability of the Jews to use the press as an unopposed instrument of Jewish policy could hardly be better illustrated than by the examples of the nation’s three most prestigious and influential newspapers: the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the Washington Post. These three, dominating America’s financial and political capitals, are the newspapers which set the trends and the guidelines for nearly all the others. They are the ones which decide what is news and what isn’t, at the national and international levels. They originate the news; the others merely copy it, and all three newspapers are in Jewish hands.

The New York Times was founded in 1851 by two Gentiles, Henry Raymond and George Jones. After their deaths, it was purchased in 1896 from Jones’s estate by a wealthy Jewish publisher, Adolph Ochs. His great-grandson, Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr., is the paper’s current publisher and CEO. The executive editor is Max Frankel, and the managing editor is Joseph Lelyveld. Both of the latter are also Jews. The Sulzberger family also owns, through the New York Times Co., 33 other newspapers, including the Boston Globe; twelve magazines, including McCall’s and Family Circle with circulations of more than 5 million each; seven radio and TV broadcasting stations; a cable-TV system; and three book publishing companies. The New York Times News Service transmits news stories, features, and photographs from the New York Times by wire to 506 other newspapers, news agencies, and magazines.

Of similar national importance is the Washington Post, which, by establishing its “leaks” throughout government agencies in Washington, has an inside track on news involving the Federal government. The Washington Post, like the New York Times, had a non-Jewish origin. It was established in 1877 by Stilson Hutchins, purchased from him in 1905 by John McLean, and later inherited by Edward McLean. In June 1933, however, at the height of the Great Depression, the newspaper was forced into bankruptcy. It was purchased at a bankruptcy auction by Eugene Meyer, a Jewish financier. The Washington Post is now run by Katherine Meyer Graham, Eugene Meyer’s daughter. She is the principal stockholder and the board chairman of the Washington Post Co. In 1979, she appointed her son Donald publisher of the paper. He now also holds the posts of president and CEO of the Washington Post Co. The Washington Post Co. has a number of other media holdings in newspapers, television, and magazines, most notably the nation’s number-two weekly newsmagazine, Newsweek.

The Wall Street Journal, which sells 1.8 million copies each weekday, is the nation’s largest-circulation daily newspaper. It is owned by Dow Jones & Company, Inc., a New York corporation which also publishes 24 other daily newspapers and the weekly financial tabloid Barron’s, among other things. The chairman and CEO of Dow Jones is Peter Kann, who is a Jew. Kann also holds the posts of chairman and publisher of the Wall Street Journal. Most of New York’s other major newspapers are in no better hands than the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal. The New York Daily News is owned by Jewish real-estate developer Mortimer B. Zuckerman. The Village Voice is the personal property of Leonard Stern, the billionaire Jewish owner of the Hartz Mountain pet supply firm.

Other Mass Media

The story is pretty much the same for other media as it is for television, radio, and newspapers.

Consider, for example, newsmagazines. There are only three of any note published in the United States: Time, Newsweek, and U.S. News and World Report. Time, with a weekly circulation of 4.1 million, is published by a susidiary of Time Warner Communications. The CEO of Time Warner Communications, as mentioned above, is Gerald Levin, a Jew.

Newsweek, as mentioned above, is published by the Washington Post Company, under the Jewess Katherine Meyer Graham. Its weekly circulation is 3.2 million.

U.S. News & World Report, with a weekly circulation of 2.3 million, is owned and published by Mortimer Zuckerman, a Jew. Zuckerman also owns the Atlantic Monthly and New York’s tabloid newspaper, the Daily News, which is the sixth-largest paper in the country.

Among the giant book-publishing conglomerates, the situation is also Jewish. Three of the six largest book publishers in the U.S., according to Publisher’s Weekly, are owned or controlled by Jews. The three are first-place Random House (with its many subsidiaries, including Crown Publishing Group), third-place Simon & Schuster, and sixth-place Time Warner Trade Group (including Warner Books and Little, Brown).

Another publisher of special significance is Western Publishing. Although it ranks only 13th in size among all U.S. publishers, it ranks first among publishers of children’s books, with more than 50 percent of the market. Its chairman and CEO is Richard Snyder, a Jew, who just replaced Richard Bernstein, also a Jew.

The Effect of Jewish Control of the Media

These are the facts of Jewish media control in America. Anyone willing to spend several hours in a large library can verify their accuracy. I hope that these facts are disturbing to you, to say the least. Should any minority be allowed to wield such awesome power? Certainly, not and allowing a people with beliefs such as expressed in the Talmud, to determine what we get to read or watch in effect gives this small minority the power to mold our minds to suit their own Talmudic interests, interests which as we have demonstrated are diametrically opposed to the interests of our people.

By permitting the Jews to control our news and entertainment media, we are doing more than merely giving them a decisive influence on our political system and virtual control of our government; we also are giving them control of the minds and souls of our children, whose attitudes and ideas are shaped more by Jewish television and Jewish films than by their parents, their schools, or any other influence.

http://pakalert.wordpress.com/2009/03/16/six-jewish-companies-own-96-of-the-worlds-media/

[ 打印 ]
閱讀 ()評論 (3)
評論
insight777 回複 悄悄話 回複 '大斧' 的評論 : 你有自己辦媒體的自由!!
大斧 回複 悄悄話 西方真相能否喚醒中國媒體精英?
宋魯鄭 NEWHNAD 2013-01-16

由南方某報新年賀詞引發的2013年第一起公共事件,再度令新聞自由成為焦點話題。然而,在相當多的海外華人看來,這不過是一個偽命題。就是部分流亡在外的自由派,也持同樣的觀點。用他們的話講:根本就沒有新聞自由,西方隻不過管治的水平更高明,更有欺騙性罷了。

在海外生活的大多數中國人——超越左中右,之所以會對包裝成西方核心價值觀的新聞自由持如此觀點,原因很簡單,事實勝於雄辯,再美好的理論,在現實麵前都是蒼白的。

近期筆者曾到訪東歐。東歐在二十多年前和中國幾乎同時、但又以不同的方式告別計劃經濟,被統稱為轉軌國家。轉軌過程中,除俄羅斯外,其他國家都得到西方的巨額經濟扶持(東歐人稱:趕走了東方的坦克Tank,迎來了西方的銀行Bank),而且更重要的是,在自由派看來,它們徹底實行了私有化和全麵的民主化,具有先進的製度優勢。然而到今天,東歐不僅依然全麵落後於西歐,更落後於中國——要知道,當年轉軌時,包括俄羅斯在內的東歐國家都遠遠領先於中國。

放眼東歐,到處是破敗的建築,落後的基礎設施,整個社會了無生氣。特別是肇始於西方的經濟危機襲來,更重創了東歐各國低迷的經濟。到現在,東歐全部債務高達1.7萬億美元——可資對照的是,中國是美國最大的債主,外匯儲備高達3.3萬億美元,西方和東歐都期待中國能伸一把援助之手。假如借方和貸方製度不同,即使我們不能武斷地說貸方的製度一定多麽優越,但總不應該得出“借方的製度要優於貸方”的結論吧。

東歐令人失望的經濟發展,自然都能從百姓的生活中體現出來。據在此地經營中餐的華人老板稱:每天早開門晚關門,卻還不夠房租水電費,他在這裏經營十年竟然賺不到錢,不得不要打道回國了。而其他店鋪莫不如此。要知道中國人是全世界最勤勞、最聰明和最能吃苦的民族之一。他們在任何國家無論政治地位如何,整體上都是經濟成功者,甚至在東南亞等國都達到了控製國家經濟命脈的程度。隻是中國人生活狀態在東歐尚且如此,普通百姓更可想而知。

東歐唯一和過去不同的是,到處充斥著操著東西南北口音的中國人!在這裏旅遊(留下印象最深的大概是曆史人文景點的年久失修)、購物、美餐,一擲千金。當然,這也使得眾多東歐國家的服務行業也不得不說起漢語。顯然,究竟東歐之路還是中國之路更成功,中國遊客、東歐各國百姓早已得出自己的答案(如果這一幕正好相反,是東歐遊客到處充斥在中國,我想答案也同樣會一清二楚)。

然而,盡管東歐依然遠遠落後於西歐,落後於中國,但西方媒體卻和二十多年前大為不同。過去,充斥西方媒體的是東歐如何落後於西歐,甚至改革開放剛剛開始,取得成就尚遠無法和今天相比的中國,也被西方媒體捧成榜樣。但是今天,雖然事實依舊,但卻再也難在西方媒體覓到類似的報道。原因很簡單,再這樣報道下去,豈不是自我否定,自打耳光?更何況,現在東歐人民有了自由,如果西方媒體再這樣忽悠下去,引發獲得自由的百姓蜂擁而入可怎麽受得了?

於是這裏就又出現了一個荒誕的現象:過去,西歐積極鼓勵沒有自由的東歐人奔向西歐——因為他們明白,再鼓勵,成功的人也不會很多,但隻要有人成功,就可以被用來打擊東歐。而現在,西歐已經不需要接納東歐人來打擊東歐了,相反他們第一位的是限製東歐人的到來。當然,西歐不可能再建柏林牆(東德建柏林牆實在愚蠢,一方麵使西歐免受低廉勞工潮的衝擊,另一方麵還給西歐提供了一個打擊自己的口實),而是建立了一個無形的“人權牆”:東歐國家要想加入歐盟,實現人員自然流動,其勞工水準必須達到西歐的水平。這恐怕也是東歐經濟發展低迷的原因:一個經濟遠遠落後於西歐的東歐,怎麽可能有條件實行和西歐一樣的勞工標準?

西歐媒體和政策的這些變化,一語以蔽之,其核心隻有一個:維護自己的國家利益。當然,在西方建立的以主權國家為基礎的國際秩序和體係下,任何國家都是國家利益至上,捍衛本國利益是所有政黨、政治人物的首要責任,也是他們合法性的基礎(這很值得中國自由派反思,這實際上也是中國自由派一百多年來一直被邊緣化的原因之一)。所以,媒體如此表現可以理解,也值得學習和借鑒。但是,西方不能“既當又立”:一方麵把媒體當成捍衛國家利益的工具,一方麵又打著新聞自由的幌子。

然而,在現實中,西方表現之惡劣,早已突破本人所批評的“既當又立”的底線,說其是中國早已經否定的“文革”的翻版都不為過。這最新的“典範”就是德國之聲。

德國之聲創立於1953年,以29種語言播出廣播節目,以德語、英語和西班牙語播出電視節目。內容上側重於報道國際時事,介紹德國時事、文化,以及德國和其他國家之間的雙邊交流。在西方與BBC、美國之音、法國國際廣播電台齊名,並列四大主流媒體。還需要指出的是,這四大媒體都一樣,其經費來源是政府財政。是標準的官辦媒體。

然而,就是這樣一個具有官方色彩、全球聲譽和國際顯赫地位的媒體,卻又是怎樣踐行“新聞自由”呢?

最早揭開黑幕是發生在2008年的張丹紅事件。張丹紅是德國之聲中文部副主任,北京奧運會前夕由於反對德國媒體一邊倒地負麵報道中國,先被“德國之聲”停止播音工作,後被解除該台中文部副主任職務。

張丹紅(資料圖)

張丹紅事件爆發後,“德國之聲”台長貝特曼邀請德國資深記者烏裏希·維克特進行真相調查。2009年2月4日,維克特拿出了調查結論,認為張丹紅的言論不僅沒有錯誤,而且“德國之聲”的解職處理也是錯誤的。張丹紅飽受批評而且直接導致她被撤職是因為這樣一句話——“中國在過去30年裏成功地使4億人擺脫了絕對貧困,因此中國共產黨比世界上任何一支政治力量在實踐人權宣言第三條方麵的貢獻都要大”,但是這句話與德國獲獎記者花久誌在《中國不是邪惡帝國》那本書裏所說的幾乎一模一樣。

隨後,德國官方把德國之聲上萬份中文報道翻譯成德文,加以審查,結果並沒有發現所謂的“紅色滲透”的內容。2008年12月1日,德國之聲的監督機構——德國之聲廣播委員會駁回了對張丹紅以及德國之聲的指責,廣播委員會全體一致認定,德國之聲中文部既沒有違反規定,也沒有破壞記者原則。

然而,盡管一切的一切都證明了張丹紅的清白,卻絲毫沒有改變她的處境:既沒有恢複名譽,更沒有恢複工作和職務。事實上,每一個人都明白,她唯一的錯誤就在於沒有歪曲事實,而是堅持了新聞原則,客觀報道了中國,而這不符合西方的政治正確,也不符合西方的利益。當然也有一種可能,張丹紅長期接受西方“新聞自由”的宣傳和灌輸,在天天被洗腦的情況下,以致於天真得竟然付諸實踐,從而付出慘重的代價。

就在世人還沒有從張丹紅事件造成的震驚中緩過勁來,另一場更大的風暴又在德國之聲肆虐。這次四名受害者是德國之聲相當資深的編輯:王鳳波(任職九年)、祝紅(任職二十三年)、李琦(任職十一年)、王雪丁(任職十二年)。如果說當年的張丹紅隻不過是被免職的話,這四個人則是被德國之聲處以極刑:掃地出門。這對於年齡偏大(如王鳳波已經47歲)、很難再找工作的他們而言等於是逼上人生絕路。

當然,這一次德國之聲也變得聰明了,或者更加虛偽了,其理由不再是張凡紅事件時的政治原因而是經濟困難、經費減少而不得不裁員。隻是奇怪的是,在把這四位經驗豐富的資深編輯辭退之後,卻又馬上招聘了毫無經驗的新手!

於是被開除的王鳳波和祝紅將“德國之聲”告上波恩地方法院,但一再敗訴。科隆地區中級勞動法庭的法官甚至在法庭上就公然赤祼祼地聲稱“隻要德國之聲懷疑它的員工是共產分子,那麽無需證據就可將他們開除”——這裏有新聞自由嗎?有法治嗎?有人權嗎?

據各當事人稱,他們之所以被處以“掃地出門”的極刑,原因在於他們對“德國之聲”在“張丹紅事件”後將中文部意識形態化的做法“進行了不屈的抵抗”。

不得不說的是,王鳳波他們應該比南方某報的那些所謂評論員要勇敢得多,更站有道德高地。因為他們一旦被開除,在這樣的輿論環境下,根本無法得到德國主流社會的理解和同情,生活無著,甚至生存都成了問題。王鳳波等當事者在不同的場合和不少德國記者同行及學者談過德國之聲中文部的問題,但是他們當中的大部分人覺得他們說的簡直是天方夜譚,在德國不可能發生。相反,很多人話裏話外還認為是我們的確有“親共”的傾向,或者至少不服從領導,愛挑刺鬧事兒,是自作自受,導致被開除。而南方某報諸君,則可以憑此資本得到西方的賞識和大力資助,成為全球知名人士,事業和人生反而更上層樓!

那麽,德國之聲的意識形態化究竟到了什麽程度了呢?不妨看看這些受害者的心聲:

“我們作為中文部的編輯與雇員,隻要還有良知,每天上班都是一種折磨,工作成為一種煎熬。每天,你的良知與正義感都在受到考驗:比如,你敢不敢說真話,敢不敢打抱不平,敢不敢不去拍馬屁,敢不敢向領導向同事表明自己的不同觀點,敢不敢說皇帝其實是在裸著難看的腚,要不要為五鬥米折腰,要不要食嗟來之食。”

“說是人性的悲劇,就在於中文部人人自危的詭異氣氛下,人性或被扭曲,或被壓抑,相互傾軋,落井下石和打小報告成為風氣。記得北京奧運開幕那一天,一位在德國之聲實習的女學生在辦公室看開幕式時淚眼晶瑩,跑出辦公室,就被政治正確的同事諷刺為‘愛黨憤青’。一位編輯同事私下悄悄對我說,她在家裏看北京奧運開幕式,數度激動得流淚,但她知道這話可不敢在辦公室裏公開說。她說,奧運開幕那是一個特殊的時刻,讓她想起作為一個小人物,一個中國人的命運的曆史沉浮感,與政治根本無關,但在當時的氣氛下,看奧運流淚就是政治立場問題。”

麵對這一切,他們不得不發出這樣的感歎:“在民主與言論自由的德國,而且還是以批判中國獨裁和新聞檢查為己任的德國之聲,一個宣揚普世價值的公法媒體,竟然對身邊的工作人員就來一場堪比中國文革的整風運動,人人自危的站隊運動,壓製不同意見的清洗運動。麥卡錫主義者1950年代的《赤色頻道:共產黨在廣播電視中的影響的報告》,仿佛又有了新的德國版本。”

不僅如此,德國之聲將他們開除後,一位高層領導還公然威脅“離開德國之聲後不要亂說”。

正是在海外的華人看到了西方“新聞自由”宣傳背後的真相,才會不約而同地得出這樣的結論:“根本就沒有新聞自由,西方隻不過管治的水平更高明,更有欺騙性罷了。”也正是這個原因,也才對國內的新聞管理製度持理解的立場(當然批評也有,比如為什麽不盡快學一學西方這樣高的管理水平),也才對國內的自由派既覺其可憐,又覺其可悲。

所以,隻有當我們了解了西方所謂新聞自由的真相之後才會明白,何以南方這樣一個在影響力、知名度遠遜於德國之聲的周報,發生的不過是修改新年賀詞如此之小的事情,竟然能夠成為全球——主要是西方媒體——的焦點重要新聞。

至於今天德國之聲中文部留下來的記者、編輯們究竟是何種水平,不妨舉我本人的親身經曆。也就是在幾個月前,我偶遇一位德國之聲的記者,才爭論幾句,她就問了我一個低級的超出我想像的問題:“宋先生如此批評西方,為何還留在西方?”。顯然,她的邏輯是,你在哪裏,你就應該愛哪裏。並用此邏輯來反駁我的觀點。當然,我本人是不會問中國的自由派同樣的問題的。

從人類的發展曆史來看,隨著經濟、社會和科技的進步,任何一個國家都會越來越透明,越來越自由。這是一個普遍的規律。至於透明和自由到什麽程度,則取決於一個國家的發展階段、文化傳統、國際環境等具體內外國情。這才是新聞自由的真義。至於西方和它們的製度捆綁在一起的“新聞自由”則是對真正新聞自由的歪曲和利用,實際上反而消滅了真正的新聞自由。應該說,這個道理,在全球化、信息化的今天,類似於南方某報等的精英們,是不難明白的。不過,假如他們真的就是不明白,就隻能期待德國之聲們來喚醒他們了。

最後,不妨重複一下德國這個民主國家、法治國家、人權國家法官的公然立場做為本文的結尾吧:

“隻要德國之聲懷疑它的員工是共產分子,那麽無需證據就可將他們開除。”
X723 回複 悄悄話 得了紅眼病的中國人心理.
登錄後才可評論.