美國移民.綠卡.簽證申請

EB1A特殊人才綠卡,EB1B研究人才綠卡,NIW國家利益豁免,EB1C經理綠卡,www.greencardapply.com
正文

I-140 Petitions and Retrogression

(2009-02-19 19:20:18) 下一個
USCIS Processing Cases Based on Priority: I-140 Petitions and Retrogression

It is typical of the USCIS to prioritize case processing, based upon availability of an immediate immigration benefit. This is particularly true when there are pressures to process some other type of particularly pressing case. While not specifically stated, the USCIS is under pressure to process huge volumes of naturalization (citizenship) cases. They also have had demands to process fairly large numbers of Adjustment of Status (I-485) applications.

The USCIS denied that it has stopped processing I-140s affected by retrogression, but stated that I-140s not subject to a backlog are being prioritized at the Nebraska Service Center, as well as the Texas Service Center (TSC). USCIS also stated that the TSC is setting up procedures to identify I-140s that are beyond normal processing times. It specifically confirmed that I-140 petitions filed under the employment-based, third preference (EB3) category were still being worked on, even though, at the time of the meeting in August, the Department of State (DOS) Visa Bulletin reflected complete unavailability of visa numbers in EB3.

Even though there may not be a visa number available for the particular I-140 case, based upon the EB-3 category and priority date, there are still benefits to obtaining approval. In addition to simple peace of mind, there is at stake potential eligibility for 2-year EADs, 3-year H1B extensions, priority date retention, and AC21 green card portability. It is also simply unfair and unjust to fail to adjudicate cases within a reasonable time. U.S. employers and their foreign national employees need to know in a timely manner if there is a defect in the case so that they can plan accordingly.

While it is understood that all organizations need to prioritize their work, cases are supposed to be adjudicated within reasonable timeframes. They are not supposed to be placed on the back burner simply because the beneficiary is not immediately eligible for the ultimate immigration benefit sought. It is detrimental to keep I-140s in extended limbo, and the USCIS is urged to find a way to adjudicate these cases in a timely fashion. http://www.greencardapply.com/news/news09/news09_0105.htm


http://www.greencardapply.com
http://www.greencardfamily.com

[ 打印 ]
閱讀 ()評論 (0)
評論
目前還沒有任何評論
登錄後才可評論.