Bicycle makers plead for protection
Low-cost overseas competition prompts call for safeguard measures fromOttawa
By STEVEN CHASE
Monday, June 20, 2005 Page B1
OTTAWA -- Canada 's two largest remaining bicycle makers -- their
factories threatened by lower-cost foreign imports -- begin a last-ditch
effort today in Ottawa to seek emergency protection from Asian rivals.
Procycle Group Inc. and Raleigh Canada Ltd. are asking the federal
government to slap a 48-per-cent tariff on foreign bike imports to stop the
bleeding of manufacturing jobs to China, Vietnam and other Asian
nations. They warn a failure to get temporary safeguard protection could
spell the end for "the vast majority" of bike manufacturing in Canada.
The case should set a precedent for how Ottawa responds to the new
economic reality where Canadian factory owners are trying to decide whether
to keep production going locally or move it offshore themselves.
"The manufacturing industry is watching this with considerable
attention," said Larry Herman, a trade lawyer with Cassels Brock in Toronto who
is not acting for either side in the case.
Mortgage Rates
Compare national rates by lender: See Chart
Procycle and Raleigh appear at the Canadian International Trade
Tribunal this morning seeking the rarely used "safeguard" shelter from foreign
competitors. This is allowed under global trade rules if an industry
faces serious injury from a sudden, unexpected flood of imports.
The case may turn into a political hot potato for Ottawa because
Finance Minister Ralph Goodale, not the independent and quasi-judicial CITT,
must ultimately approve safeguard actions.
Procycle and Raleigh say the imports in question -- teen and adult
bikes -- have almost doubled in recent years to 1,063,768 units in 2004
from 538,523 in 2000.
Mr. Goodale may be forced to choose between angering Beijing --
Canada's top new trade priority -- or voters in Quebec, where the biggest bike
manufacturing plants are located and where hundreds of textile jobs
have already been lost to Asian competitors such as China.
The retail bicycle market in Canada is worth as much as $300-million in
annual sales, but market share held by Canadian producers has plummeted
in recent years, sliding to 30 per cent in 2004 from 58 per cent in
2000. Imports now control 70 per cent of the market.
Canada's largest retail stores are fighting the requested safeguard,
warning it would drive up bicycle prices, erode selection and send
Canadians cross-border shopping to the United States for better deals.
"It would make it much more difficult to [import] the products that are
in demand, and if and when those products were brought in, they would
be a hell of a lot more expensive in Canada," says Diane Brisebois,
president of the Retail Council of Canada.
"Retailers are shaking their heads. You don't get safeguards if you are
a retailer. If a retailer decides to come in from the United States to
compete with you . . . you've got to compete."
She said retailers have told her that Canadian bike makers should be
focusing on more specialized niches to stay competitive.
"You don't just continue producing commodity products . . . especially
when there's an incredible demand for specialty products in that sector
and we are importing them from Spain, Italy and France. We would rather
buy them from a Canadian supplier."
Retailers say the situation facing Canadian bike makers does not meet
the test for safeguards because manufacturers have themselves to blame
for lost sales.
They also note that Canadian bike makers have enjoyed some government
protection against low-priced imports from various countries for a long
time.
"With the exception of a few years, they have had anti-dumping
protection since 1978 . . Since 1992 there has been steady protection," said
Darrel Pearson of Gottlieb & Pearson, whose client is the Retail Council
of Canada.
"This is a very, very small industry which has had a tonne of time to
adjust to imports," he said of Raleigh and Procycle.
The CITT will render its decision on the case Sept. 1. If it agrees
with bicycle makers and recommends safeguards, then Prime Minister Paul
Martin's government will have to decide whether to enact them.
Both companies' significant operations are in Quebec: Procycle's in St.
Georges-de-Beauce and Raleigh's in Waterloo. Between them, Raleigh and
Procycle employ approximately 600 people.
Both build their own frames, as well as some handlebars and other parts
such as rims and they assemble the wheels from Canadian and imported
parts.
Their domestic competitors include Canadian importers, companies that
assemble bikes from wholly-imported parts and some smaller
manufacturers.
Ken Morrison, Raleigh's vice-president of finance, said the company
does not want to shut down its Waterloo factory. "We are the major
employer in our town. Many of our employees have been with us for over 20
years. There are no other places where they can readily seek employment if
the factory was to close."
Bike makers say that if Ottawa doesn't want to slap a 48 per cent
tariff on imports, it could instead impose quota restrictions, limiting
imports to 600,000 units -- half of the total bikes entering Canada.
Opponents of the safeguards warn it will anger China, which is a major
bike exporter to Canada.
"This is like the finger in the dyke approach to trade policy," said
Peter Clark, a trade consultant acting for an importer opposed to the
safeguards.
Two-wheeled flood
Procycle Group Inc., and Raleigh Canada Ltd. are asking Ottawa to slap
a 48-per-cent tariff on foreign bike imports to stop the bleeding of
manufacturing jobs to China, Vietnam and other Asian nations.
$300-million: Annual sales of bicycles in Canada.
111%: The rate at which bicycle imports rose between 2000 and 2004.
969,300: The number of foreign-made bicycles that hit the Canadian
market in 2004, up from 460,425 in 2000.
30%: The market share held by Canadian producers in 2004, down from 50
per cent in 2000.
70%: The share of the bicycle market now made up of imports.