奧巴馬愚弄選民的把戲再次被揭露

奧巴馬愚弄選民的把戲再次被揭露

奧巴馬和希拉莉在OHIO大戰的時候，希拉莉曾罵他可恥。第一，他造希拉莉的謠。第二，據加拿大政府透露，公開批評北美自由貿易協定的奧巴馬，私下向加拿大政府表示，這都是為選舉而說的，上台後不會變。

最近，他故伎重演，又讓人抓住把柄。在伊拉克撤軍問題上，公開叫囂要美軍迅速從伊拉克撤出來的奧巴馬，私下裏卻要求伊拉克政府要放慢讓美軍撤軍的時間，一切要待大選以後再研究。

表麵說一套，背後做一套，克林頓兩口子都罵他言行不一，忽悠選民。這種人要也能當總統，真實美國人民的災難。可惜的是，美國選民睜眼瞎實在太多了。

By Amir Taheri, New York Post
September 15, 2008
Posted: 4:02 am
September 15, 2008

WHILE campaigning in public for a speedy withdrawal of US troops from Iraq, Sen. Barack Obama has tried in private to persuade Iraqi leaders to delay an agreement on a draw-down of the American military presence.

According to Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari, Obama made his demand for delay a key theme of his discussions with Iraqi leaders in Baghdad in July.

"He asked why we were not prepared to delay an agreement until after the US elections and the formation of a new administration in Washington," Zebari said in an interview.

Obama insisted that Congress should be involved in negotiations on the status of US troops - and that it was in the interests of both sides not to have an agreement negotiated by the Bush administration in its "state of weakness and political confusion."

"However, as an Iraqi, I prefer to have a security agreement that regulates the activities of foreign troops, rather than keeping the matter open." Zebari says.

Though Obama claims the US presence is "illegal," he suddenly remembered that Americans troops were in Iraq within the legal framework of a UN mandate. His advice was that, rather than reach an accord with the "weakened Bush administration," Iraq should seek an extension of the UN mandate.

While in Iraq, Obama also tried to persuade the US commanders, including Gen. David Petraeus, to suggest a "realistic withdrawal date." They declined.

Obama has made many contradictory statements with regard to Iraq. His latest position is that US combat troops should be out by 2010. Yet his effort to delay an agreement would make that withdrawal deadline impossible to meet.

Supposing he wins, Obama's administration wouldn't be fully operational before February - and naming a new ambassador to Baghdad and forming a new negotiation team might take longer still.

By then, Iraq will be in the throes of its own campaign season. Judging by the past two elections, forming a new coalition government may then take three months. So the Iraqi negotiating team might not be in place until next June.

Then, judging by how long the current talks have taken, restarting the process from scratch would leave the two sides needing at least six months to come up with a draft accord. That puts us at May 2010 for when the draft might be submitted to the Iraqi parliament - which might well need another six months to pass it into law.