2007 (223)
2008 (139)
2009 (90)
2017 (1)
2018 (3)
"One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors." ---Plato
奧巴馬沒有自己創過業,也沒有給別人上過班。他所有的經驗是社區服務。什麽是社區服務?就是怎麽去跟政府去索取。在他的腦子裏,政府很有錢,但為窮人,也就是黑人做的太少。政府可以製造很多就業機會,比如修橋補路。
奧巴馬沒有父愛,也沒有母愛。他的生父是來自非洲的黑人學生。他的母親聽了他的一次發言就獻身。奧巴馬後來又被母親寄托給老爺佬佬。然而,他對他們的培養並不領情。
奧巴馬的自傳是寫他與他父親的關係。一個在很小的時候被黑人生父拋棄,跟著白人母親和母親家人長大的奧巴馬為什麽對撫養自己的親人無動於衷,而要去追尋那個拋棄他的父親?
立誌從政的奧巴馬深知,自己的白人血統同黑人血統相比不會給他帶來什麽機會。白人會對他有偏見,而同黑人混成一片會有更大的機會。對於奧巴馬的戀父之情,奧巴馬的母親在世的時候表示理解,說他需要這樣做。
一個認為政府的存在就是要為窮人服務,大公司是剝削壓迫老百姓的吸血鬼,滿腦子左派極端社會主義思想的機會主義者,他能給美國帶來什麽變化?
1。劫福濟貧。奧巴馬把中產階級定位在年收入$25萬以下。年收入$25萬以上的人稅率要從增加到39%。奧巴馬還要恢複被取消的遺產稅。
2。增加政府福利開支和政府項目的預算。一是繼續劫福濟貧,二是增加黑人和窮人的就業機會。
除了通過政府來劫福濟貧這個主要目的以外,其他的問題都不重要。你想聽什麽,他就說什麽給你聽。他的所謂從下而上的變化,說白了,就是要把美國從資本主義國家變成社會主義國家。
美國在外交上對別國指手畫腳的樣子的確不招人喜歡。全世界反美的力量都不希望美國繼續保持世界強國的地位。
如果奧巴馬真的上台來推行他的極左路線,會加速美國的衰退,退出在世界範圍的領導地位。
是誰最希望看到這一天呢? 是跟美國和西方世界宣戰的穆斯林極端恐怖主義分子,是美國的敵人。
也許奧巴馬真的像他自己說的那樣愛美國,但是他的社會主義思想如果真的會實現的話,將會到達同國外反美勢力裏應外合的實際效果。
這也是為什麽他在世界各地特別是信仰穆斯林教的國家深受歡迎的主要原因之一。
如果有誰也希望美國完蛋的話,去投奧巴馬吧。
至於本人,我會投麥肯。
• | • | ||
• | • |
麥肯是共和黨中的民主黨,他絕對不是布什。
Typing Chinese takes time, that's why. : )
Yes, vote for the candidate that represents your major interest.
Thanks.
選誰都無所謂,我的評論是兩個土鱉,誰上台美國都不會更強
看看美國的貨幣政策就知道從根本上就錯了,而這兩個土鱉都沒有魄力來改變這個錯誤,美國的衰退是注定的
美國不是要民主麽?就民主吧
我隻是很懷疑民主了半天幾個億人裏就沒個有能力當總統的?
讓BUSH 或OBAMA 這樣的土鱉出來SHOW ?
要是真的民主,BUSH或OBAMA 這樣的驢頭就不應該上台
The U.S. goes toward Socialism while China is going toward Capitalism, it is possibly the fate.
Write more, please!
這是誤解。
據IRS統計,在2006年度,年收入在$39萬以上的納稅人占納稅人口的1%,但所交的個人所得稅是美國全部個人所得稅的40%,而BOTTOM50%的納稅人即你所說的中低產階級的納稅隻占2。9%。大中公司納更多的稅。
這個國家是靠誰來維持的不言而喻。
US is in the war, because US has been attacked. As long as the eenemy is still there, they will attack again. So the war on terror will go as long as it takes. It may be 10 years, may be 100 years or forever.
Nobody likes war, but when you have been attacked, you have no choice but fighting back.
As far as war is concerned, it makes no difference who will be the next President of US, he will face the reality that the enemy must be defeated.
Obama has already changed his position on war in Iraq. He will change again when he is in the office if he's elected.
You don't think McCain is going to get Europeans' or others support, do you?
People have war fatigue because of the War in Iraq.
到歐洲去討好,去為美國道歉。跑了一圈就是沒看美國傷病員,因為國防部不讓媒體同他一道去,沒有風光的機會。
我也喜歡McCain, 更應該說是敬重!
真不明白Obama選美國總統跑到歐洲去幹什麽? 趁著還沒選時先去過過癮, 選完他就沒戲啦! 一個善於作秀的戲子.
another one:
July 21, 2007 -- South Korean Foreign Minister Song Min-soon said today that his country's troops will be withdrawn from Afghanistan at the end of the year.
Guess you haven't followed the news. : )
"Amid reports of transatlantic tensions over the NATO mission in Afghanistan, Germany has rejected an urgent U.S. call for combat troops in battle-ravaged southern Afghanistan, as Canada warned it could withdraw its troops if NATO fails to send reinforcements to the battle-ravaged south."
What are you talking about? War in Afghanistan was supported by the international coalition, war in Iraq is a complete, 100%, most stupid mistake. McCain even wants US troops to stay in Vietnam. Taxpayer money? The amount of $$ disappeared (I mean: disappeared, not spent) in Iraq is more than the lump sum of US entired one year budget for scientific research.
Well, don't think a minute Obama is not going to have a war. He is going to have his Afghanistan war with American taxpayers' money, since other countries will not join him.
Thanks. I know John McCain is not the best choice, at least he stands for something that I believe are important than speeches.
haha~~ who need your care anyway. : )
Go ahead, joint them, you won't be alone. : )
我投奧巴馬