風蕭蕭_Frank
以文會友
萬斯說 我們進行恐嚇說教和教訓 中國修建道路橋梁提供食物
美國當選副總統 JD Vance US Vice President-elect, JD Vance
J.D. Vance about US Foreign Policy
我們製定的外交政策是對那些不願與之有任何瓜葛的國家進行恐嚇、說教和教訓。而中國的外交政策是修建道路橋梁，為窮人提供食物。我認為，我們應該奉行一種外交政策，一種尊重的外交，一種不植根於說教的外交政策。這種外交政策應該植根於我們國家的國家利益。
我們製定的外交政策是對那些不願與之有任何瓜葛的國家進行恐嚇、說教和教訓。而中國的外交政策是修建道路橋梁，為窮人提供食物。我認為，我們應該奉行一種外交政策，一種尊重的外交，一種不植根於說教的外交政策。這種外交政策應該植根於我們國家的國家利益。
非洲小黑哥蔑視高誌凱：你虛偽！看高教授如何回應！多哈論壇中非激烈辯論。美副總統讚中國幫助非洲！稱要學習！哀其不爭
2025年9月14日 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kaVDqlCr5SM
主持人
中國的外交政策是修路架橋，救濟貧困人口。我認為我們應該奉行一種尊重的外交政策。那麽，中國在哪些核心原則方麵做得對，值得世界其他國家學習呢？
高智凱
非常感謝Fima。我很榮幸來到這裏，也向各位尊敬的聽眾、其他小組成員，以及台上的各位傑出的學生們致以問候。首先，我認為我們生活的世界是一個多極世界。如果有人說他們想回到單極世界，那簡直是不可能完成的任務。過去46年來，中國一直在建設中國特色社會主義。我認為更重要的是中國特色。那麽，這些特色是什麽呢？這真是一個千古難題。我想說，在過去40年左右的時間裏，中國一直高度重視發展。
肖英表示，發展是硬道理。我們相信每個國家都需要發展，任何國家都不應自滿。任何國家都不應固步自封，甚至不應試圖阻礙其他國家的發展。因此，穩定至關重要，維護世界和平至關重要，推動各種自由貿易和市場經濟也同樣重要。放眼世界，中國始終強調互聯互通和基礎設施建設的重要性。為什麽？因為我們從中受益匪淺。中國有句俗語：要想富，先修路。這就是為什麽中國熱衷於建設，而其他一些國家卻不熱衷於建設。他們可能更傾向於破壞。所以，我認為，選擇非常明確。讓我們真正關注發展、穩定與和平，並始終相信發展是硬道理、軟道理和智慧道理。謝謝。所以，維克多，你讓我們對中國模式有了些了解。從你描述中國如何看待自己和世界其他國家的方式來看，我們可以向全球輸出哪些理念？或者說，你認為中國可以向全球輸出哪些理念？
嗯，我認為中國並不掌握真理。
真理總是相對的。有些真理對你有用，但對其他人可能不起作用。我認為從中國的角度來看，有幾件事確實非常重要。第一，沒有民主就沒有現代化。所以中國並不反對民主。中國提倡民主。
但另一方麵，民主沒有固定的模式。你需要根據自己的國情調整民主，並建立自己獨特的製度。其次，我們經常聽到關於人權的討論。人權非常重要。但我認為從中國的角度來看，人權並非存在於真空之中。人權需要與人類義務相平衡。你
不能隻談論人權，而不平等地談論人類的義務。因此，我認為
中國人的視角更加平衡，更加包容，而不是片麵。例如，在這個
八月大廳裏，我不能喊火。這
不是我言論自由的行使。這實際上是違法的。例如，如果我的
喊叫導致被貼郵票。
因此，我認為當我們談論所有這些事情時，我們需要非常謹慎地理解這些標簽的真正含義。很快，英國幾百年來都沒有最高法院。歐盟在定期審查中發現了這一缺陷，並命令英國設立最高法院。這就是為什麽如果你去倫敦，去威斯敏斯特廣場，在廣場西側，就會看到英國最高法院。為什麽？因為英國建立了帝國，卻在沒有最高法院的情況下退出了帝國。雖然英國一直在談論權力平衡，但我們需要真正了解所有這些標簽的真正含義，以及你是否真的在言行一致。我認為我們都需要找到一種服務於我們自己人民根本利益的方式，而不是被別人說教，將其他價值觀強加於我們自己的國家。謝謝。
問
是的，我想向G先生提出這個問題。嗯，你提到過，中國對其他國家奉行不幹涉政策，
並且各國應該擁有自主決定其生活方式或其存在方式的能力。但是，嗯，你難道不認為中國在非洲各地的存在在某種程度上，是某種力量的體現，某種軟實力的體現嗎？這難道不與中國的外交政策相矛盾嗎？
答：在談到中國??與非洲的廣泛接觸之前，請允許我提一件事。非洲本身就是一個被遺忘的大陸。高宗三（Victor Gao）並非如此。西方國家通常都這麽說。非殖民化後的非洲，或多或少是被遺忘的大陸。西方其他國家
出於各種原因
不願參與。中國參與了。中國把每個非洲國家都當兄弟姐妹一樣對待。中國在非洲投資巨大。現在許多其他國家
也在談論與非洲合作，
包括美國、許多歐洲國家，例如印度。
越多越好，因為非洲
不應該被任何其他國家壟斷，
包括中國，也包括其他任何人。非洲是屬於非洲人民的，
而布丁的滋味永遠是
你不應該自己評判。如果你去非洲國家，問他們
是否喜歡修路，
是否喜歡建體育館，
等等，那才是唯一的真理，因為
不要被其他國家說教，
非洲國家應該擁有什麽樣的價值觀。非洲的價值觀
與其他許多大洲不同。
例如，其他大洲的國家需要幫助非洲國家建設基礎設施，提升製造業能力，而這正是中國唯一的目標。中國對非洲國家沒有殖民目的。中國與非洲相距甚遠。中國在非洲和非洲北部國家（例如拉丁美洲國家）所做的一切，都與非洲和非洲南部國家（例如拉丁美洲國家）的做法相同。這體現了中國的理念，即如果我們建設轉型的支柱，我們就會與你們分享。如果我們認為修路是唯一的出路，我們就會幫助你們修路。
非洲學生問
謝謝。我叫詹博上校，喬治城大學大一學生。我的問題很簡單。高先生，您這樣說是不是有點虛偽？我為什麽這麽問？您的意思是，在非洲，你們允許一些建築物和基礎設施在那裏建造。我來自津巴布韋。我們擁有世界第二大鋰礦儲量，但僅僅因為中國為我國建立了一個議會，我們就瀕臨失去所有這些鋰礦的所有權。所以，如果你說你在維護各國主權，卻要奪走我們自己的議會，比如說肯尼亞的機場，那你難道不虛偽嗎？虛偽。虛偽。答：讓我直言不諱。津巴布韋是一個偉大的國家。幾年前你們舉行了選舉，當時的總統候選人非常反對中國。他當選總統後，一上任就改變了主意，因為他確信，中國是津巴布韋經濟發展的主要貢獻者。如果你不同意我的觀點，那就回你的國家去和你的政府談談，看看過去30年裏哪個國家在你們偉大的國家投資最多。我非常了解津巴布韋。中國與津巴布韋曆屆政府合作了幾十年，包括你們的曆任偉大總統。我想說，中國與津巴布韋的經濟合作，幫助了津巴布韋的經濟轉型，建設了基礎設施，提升了貴國的製造業能力。這是事實。如果我可以告訴你，我認為這是唯一的真相。發展才是硬道理。謝謝你，兄弟。
主持人
我想播放一段現任參議員、美國候任副總統JD Vance的視頻。他正在談論美國的外交政策。
美國萬斯說
我們製定的外交政策是對那些不願與之有任何瓜葛的國家進行恐嚇、說教和教訓。而中國的外交政策是修建道路橋梁，為窮人提供食物。我認為，我們應該奉行一種外交政策，一種尊重的外交，一種不植根於說教的外交政策。這種外交政策應該植根於我們國家的國家利益。
非洲學生說
是的，我叫伊曼，是西北大學新聞專業的學生。我想回顧一下我們之前關於非洲的對話，我認為我們不斷陷入指責中國的陷阱，這很有意思。這並非為中國辯護，但如果我們認真反思，盡管人們像加先生所說的那樣，稱非洲為被遺忘的大陸，但在整個現代史上，非洲一直被剝削和榨取其所有價值。甚至在殖民主義之前，西方就已經在非洲存在。而就中國而言，這似乎隻是權力的轉移。這似乎並不像中國走進非洲，決定建設基礎設施，以此作為誘餌的一種新興趨勢，因為如果我們看看國際貨幣基金組織（IMF）的做法，他們基本上也做了同樣的事情。托馬斯·桑卡拉（Thomas Sankara）多次談到過這個問題，他試圖將非洲國家困在貧困和不穩定的境地，並依賴西方繼續剝削。
非洲小黑哥蔑視高誌凱：你虛偽！看高教授如何回應！多哈論壇中非激烈辯論。美副總統讚中國幫助非洲！稱要學習！哀其不爭
2025年9月14日 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kaVDqlCr5SM
The Chinese have a foreign policy of
building roads and bridges and feeding
poor people. And I think that we should
pursue a foreign policy, a diplomacy of
respect.
Fore what does China get right in terms of
core principles that the rest of the
world can learn from China?
Thank you very much Fima. It's a great
honor for me to be here and greetings to
the distinguished audience as well as
the other panelists and equally if not
more importantly to the distinguished
students on the stage. First of all, I
think the world we are living in is a
multipolar world. If anyone says they
want to go back to the unipolar world,
it's a mission impossible. For the past
46 years, China has been building
socialism with Chinese characteristics.
I would say the more important thing are
the characteristics. So what are these
characteristics? This is really a
million-doll question. I would say for
the past four decades or so, China has
been put a premium on development.
Shiaoing said development is the hard
truth. We believe every country need to
develop and no country should be
complacent. No country should rest on
its own laurel or even try to throw a
wedge in other count's development. So
stability is very much of an asset and
keeping peace in the world is very much
important and also pushing for free
trade and market practice of all kinds
should be very important. When we look
around the world, China always
emphasizes the importance of
connectivity, infrastructure. Why?
Because we benefited from this. In
China, we have a saying, if you want to
reach, be rich, build a road. That's why
China builds whereas several other
countries
are not in the building mode. They
probably want to destroy. So, I think
the choice is very clear. Let's really
put a focus on development, stability,
peace, and always believe in development
as the hard truth and the softer truth
and the smart truth. Thank you.
So, Victor, you gave us some insight
into the China model. From the way you
described how China sees itself and the
rest of the world, what ideas could we
or do you think China could export
globally?
Well, I don't think China has the truth.
Uh truth is always relative. Uh some
truth works for you, but it may not work
for others. I think from the Chinese
perspective, several things really are
very important. One is that without
democracy there will be no
modernization. So China does not oppose
democracy. China advocates democracy.
But then on the other hand democracy
uh has no set model. You need to adapt
democracy to your own national
circumstances and come up with your own
unique system. Now secondly we hear a
lot about human rights. Human rights are
so important. But I think from the
Chinese perspective, human rights do not
exist in a vacuum. Human rights need to
be balanced with human obligations. You
cannot talk about human rights without
equally talking about
human obligations. Therefore, I think
the Chinese perspective is more
balanced, is more all inclusive rather
than one-sided. For example, in this
August hall, I cannot cry fire. That's
not an exercise of my freedom of speech.
It's actually a violation of law. If my
cry results in stamp tee, for example.
Therefore, I think when we talk about
all these things, we need to be very
careful as to what these labels really
mean. Very quickly, the United Kingdom
for many hundred years didn't have a
Supreme Court. The EU during its
periodic review found that deficiency
and EU ordered the United Kingdom to set
up the Supreme Court. That's why if you
go to London, go to the Westminster
Square on the west side of square, there
is a Supreme Court of the United
Kingdom. Why?
Because United Kingdom build the empire,
declined from the empire without a
Supreme Court. While Britain had always
talked about the balance of power, we
need to really know what all these
labels are really about and whether you
are really delivering and walking the
walk while you talk the talk. I think we
all need to find a way to serve the
fundamental interest of our own people
rather than being lectured upon by
others and having other values being
imposed on our own country. Thank you.
Yeah,
問
I would like to challenge Mr. G
with this question. Um so you've
mentioned that uh China has a no
interference policy with other states
and that states should have their own
ability to dictate their way of life or
their just their existence. But um
wouldn't you say your that chi China's
presence all over Africa is in a way uh
an exercise of some sorts of power a
soft power of sorts and does that not
contradict with um the foreign policy of
China.
答
Allow me to mention one thing before
China's extensive engagement with
Africa. Africa itself is a forgotten
continent. That's not what Victor Gao
said. That's generally being said by
Western countries. Africa after
decolonization was more or less the
forgotten continent. Western countries
did not want to engage it for whatever
reason. China went in. China treated
every African country as brot her and
sister. And China really invested hugely
in Africa. Now many other countries are
talking about engaging with Africa
including the United States, many
European countries, India for example.
The more the better because Africa
should not be a monopoly for any other
country, not for China, not for anyone
else. Africa is for the African people
and the taste of the pudding is always
you should not be a judge yourself. If
you go to African country and ask them
whether they like building a road,
whether they like building a gymnasium
etc. that is the only truth because
don't be lectured by other countries
about what value African country should
have. The African value will be
different from many other continents.
For example, the other countries in
other continents will need to help the
African country to build up their
infrastructure to build their
manufacturing capabilities and that is
the only goal for China. China has no
colonial objective for African
countries. China is so far away
physically from Africa. Whatever China
is doing, China is doing the same in AAN
countries, in Latin American countries
for example. And this is a sign of
China's philosophy that is if we build
our pillars of transformation. We want
to share that with you. If we believe
building road is the only way out, we
help you to build the road.
問
Thank you. My name is Col Jumbo,
freshman student at Georgetown University. My question is
simple. Are you not being hypocritical,
Mr. Gao? Why I'm asking? You're saying
that okay, in Africa, you're allowing
some buildings, some infrastructure to
be there. I'm from Zimbabwe. We have the
second largest lithium reserves, but
we're at the brink of losing ownership
of all these lithium reserves just
because China built a parliament for my
country. So if you're saying that you
are promoting the sovereignity of
nations of of of countries, but you're
taking our own parliament away and let's
say the airport in Kenya for example,
are you not being hypocritical?
Hypocritical. Hypocritical
答
Let me be very blunt. Zimbabwe is a
great country. You had your election
several years ago and the presidential
candidate was very much against China.
He's elected as the president and once
he's in his office he changed his mind
because he knows for sure that for
Zimbabwe development China is the main
contributor for the Zimbabwean economic
development. If you do not agree with
me, go back to your country, talk to
your government and check out over the
past 30 years which country has invested
most heavily in your great country. I
know Zimbabwe well. China has dwelt with
Zimbabwe governments for several
decades, including your great
presidents, for example. And I would say
China's Zimbabwe economic cooperation
has helped the economic transformation
in Zimbabwe in building up
infrastructure facilities and in
building up a manufacturing capabilities
of your country. That is the truth. If I
may tell you, I think that is the only
truth. Development is the hard
truth. Thank you, brother.
主持人
I want to bring in some video from the
current senator and US Vice
President-elect, JD Vance. Here he is
talking about American foreign policy.
美國萬斯
We have built a foreign policy of
hectoring and moralizing and lecturing
countries that don't want anything to do
with it. The Chinese have a foreign
policy of building roads and bridges and
feeding poor people. And I think that we
should pursue a foreign policy, a
diplomacy of respect and a foreign
policy that is not rooted in moralizing.
It's rooted in the national interest of
this country.
問
Yeah, my name is Iman. I'm a student at
Northwestern University studying
journalism. I just want to reflect on
the conversation that we had about
Africa specifically, which I think it's
pretty interesting that we keep falling
into the trap of pointing the finger at
China. And this is not in defense of
China, but if we really reflect on it,
as as much as people do call, like Mr.
Ga said, Africa the the forgotten
continent, it has been exploited and milked for
everything it's worth for the entirety
of our modern history. Even before
colonialism, we had Western presence in
in Africa. And it seems like this is
just a shift in power when it comes to
China. It doesn't seem like this is a
emerging trend of you know China kind of
walking in and deciding to build
infrastructure to you know dangle bait
at African countries cuz if we look at
the IMF they did basically the same
thing. We have Thomas Sankara talked
about it a lot of kind of trapping
African states in a state of need and
instability and relying on the west to
continue exploitation.
