個人資料
正文

Mark Carney 價值觀 為所有人構建更美好的世界

(2025-07-16 17:10:37) 下一個

價值觀:為所有人構建更美好的世界

https://www.amazon.ca/Values-Building-Better-World-All/dp/0771051557

作者:馬克·卡尼,2021年3月16日

內容概要

《價值觀》是馬克·卡尼的著作,探討了價值觀在塑造社會和經濟體係中的作用。卡尼在書中指出,市場經濟已經偏離了其道德基礎,將短期經濟利益置於公平、韌性和可持續性等社會價值觀之上。他批評了過度依賴市場驅動型解決方案的做法,並呼籲經濟體係優先考慮道德價值觀。卡尼借鑒了他在2008年金融危機和新冠疫情期間的央行工作經驗,解釋了這些危機如何進一步凸顯了價值觀的重要性。

全國暢銷書 • 2021年全國商業圖書獎得主 • 2021年唐納獎入圍

加拿大總理兼前銀行行長就構建一個基於人類價值觀而非市場價值觀的經濟和社會所必須進行的徹底、基礎性變革提出了大膽而緊迫的論點。

我們的世界充滿斷層——日益加劇的收入和機會不平等;係統性種族主義;全球疫情帶來的健康和經濟危機;對專家的不信任;氣候變化的生存威脅;以及機器人技術興起對數字經濟中就業的嚴重威脅。馬克·卡尼認為,這些根本性問題以及其他類似問題源於共同的價值觀危機。馬克·卡尼以過去十年的動蕩為例,揭示了“市場經濟”如何演變為價格決定一切價值的“市場社會”。

當我們思考個人最珍視的事物時,我們可能會列出公平、健康、權利的保障、免於貧困的經濟保障、自然多樣性、資源和美景的保護。悲劇的是,這些我們最珍視的事物往往在21世紀的世界中成為犧牲品,而它們本應是我們的基石。

在這本意義深遠的新書中,馬克·卡尼提出了一個更人道社會的願景,並提出了實現這一願景的切實宣言。每一章都以如何改革基礎設施,使社會變得更美好、更公平為核心,並概述了能夠重塑社會、將人類價值觀置於我們為子孫後代建設的一切的核心的全新理念。

馬克·卡尼的價值觀:他2021年出版的新書揭示了他未來可能的領導者形象

2025年3月11日 作者:馬克·李

馬克·卡尼在演講台上發言

可以說,馬克·卡尼2021年出版的新書《價值觀:為所有人建設更美好的世界》是他競選首相的早期申請。《價值觀》涵蓋了廣泛的經濟史和哲學,並為我們了解這位新首相的成就提供了一些線索。

在長達531頁的書中,卡尼為加拿大描繪了一個充滿希望的願景,盡管在細節上缺乏更清晰的闡述。我們隻能得出這樣的結論:他是一位非常稱職的中間派人士,他對加拿大的規劃不會偏離現狀太多。麵對特朗普的第二屆政府,許多人會覺得這已經足夠了,但人們不禁想要更多。

我第一次閱讀《價值觀》時,略感失望。我原本希望這本書更像是一本回憶錄:從內部人士的角度,了解卡尼擔任加拿大央行行長期間的2008-09年金融危機,或者從幕後視角,了解新冠疫情初期(當時卡尼執掌英格蘭銀行)。書中有一些回憶錄的片段,但總的來說,《價值觀》是一本關於經濟學、曆史和哲學的書,作者是一位曾在公共和私營部門高層任職的人士。

那麽,《價值觀》的核心理念是什麽?這又能告訴我們他會成為怎樣的領導者?卡尼堅信市場,但也承認市場需要受到監管才能產生良好的結果。與他的保守黨對手皮埃爾·波利耶夫雷受米爾頓·弗裏德曼啟發的自由市場觀點形成鮮明對比的是,卡尼評論道:“不受約束的市場原教旨主義正在吞噬資本主義自身長期活力所必需的社會資本。”

《價值觀》一書涵蓋三個不同的部分:對現代經濟和貨幣體係演變的曆史和哲學思考;對三次現代危機(金融危機、新冠疫情和氣候變化)的回顧;以及涵蓋領導力和成功現代經濟方向的前瞻性議程。他列舉了七項支撐成功現代經濟的基本價值觀和信念:活力、韌性、可持續性、公平、責任、團結和謙遜。我們將在下文中回顧這些價值觀。

正如你可能已經猜到的那樣,《價值觀》是對“價值”一詞不同社會和經濟含義的巧妙運用。我們作為人類所擁有的價值觀植根於我們的經濟和政治製度,這些製度最終應該超越我們消費或購買的商品所體現的金錢價值。卡尼對早期經濟學家如何將經濟價值視為客觀事物進行了精彩的探討——這種客觀事物主要與生產過程中投入的勞動相關——這與現代經濟學的主觀價值截然相反,現代經濟學認為價值取決於旁觀者的眼光,由市場冷酷的邏輯決定。

什麽價值?

許多當代經濟學家提出的一個關鍵區分是價值創造和價值提取。後者指的是從經濟其他部分攫取的活動,這些活動是非勞動收入(也稱為經濟租金)。價值提取最初指的是地主獲得的非勞動收入,或自然資源作為自然饋贈的價值。在現代經濟中,非勞動收入更多地與國家認可的壟斷有關,包括專利和版權,以及銀行、票務公司和社交媒體平台扮演的守門人角色。

遺憾的是,卡尼在繼續論述之前,隻是略微探究了價值提取和非勞動收入的幕後。或許是因為深入探討可能會觸及痛處,包括卡尼早年在高盛擔任銀行家的經曆。如果你想更深入地批判價值榨取和尋租,更好的切入點是閱讀瑪麗安娜·馬祖卡托的《萬物的價值》或約瑟夫·斯蒂格利茨的《不平等的代價》。

這是一個錯失的機會,因為在幾章之後,卡尼就對日益加劇的不平等的腐蝕性影響發表了看法。他引用了經合組織和國際貨幣基金組織的證據,以支持“相對平等有利於增長”以及“更平等的社會更具韌性,……更有可能為大多數人而不是少數人投資”的觀點,但卻未能將這些點與不平等的根源聯係起來。盡管如此,我們仍然擔心市場社會的貪婪價值觀可能會損害其他核心價值觀,例如利他主義、慷慨、團結和公民精神。

三次危機

《價值觀》的中間部分探討了過去二十五年的三次重大危機:2008-2009 年金融危機、2020-2021 年新冠疫情以及持續不斷的氣候變化。本書對曆史和政府應對措施進行了不錯的概述,但考慮到卡尼當時的近距離視角,分析顯得有些單薄。

關於金融危機,卡尼更多地談論的是 2007 年發生的一次事件,而不是席卷全球的金融危機本身。

一年後。卡尼仍在財政部任職時,加拿大資產支持商業票據 (ABCP) 市場即將陷入停滯。ABCP 是一種被稱為證券化的金融創新形式,其含義是將公司債券(商業票據)的利息收入重新打包成可出售給養老基金和其他投資基金的資產。

卡尼協助促成了倫敦、紐約和加拿大銀行之間關於 ABCP 的協議,從而渡過了難關,避免了金融市場爆發重大危機。這場危機我們不得不等待一年才能揭曉,但同樣的金融創新痕跡——將美國抵押貸款與次級抵押貸款的有毒資產捆綁在一起進行證券化——在經濟崩潰及其蔓延至世界各個角落的過程中無處不在。

卡尼於 2008 年 2 月出任加拿大央行行長,但我們對加拿大央行和卡尼在當年秋季市場崩潰時如何製定和實施加拿大貨幣政策一無所知。相反,敘述跳到了後來,通過二十國集團和金融穩定理事會(一個由精英央行行長和證券監管機構組成的俱樂部)的宏觀審慎監管來提升金融體係穩定性的努力。由於這些努力,一切都很好,或者至少我們是這樣認為的,但這很難讓人放心,因為金融市場似乎正從一個泡沫跳到另一個泡沫。

卡尼對新冠疫情的報道同樣缺乏關於前所未有的財政和貨幣政策應對措施的細節。經濟停擺發生之際,卡尼正準備卸任英格蘭銀行行長一職。如果能看看卡尼和英格蘭銀行如何在如此巨大的不確定性中定位自己,那將是一件引人入勝的事情。然而,我們卻轉向了成本效益分析的缺陷,以及諸如將人轉化為美元的統計壽命等指標的濫用。

卡尼談到了在新冠疫情麵前重新發現的韌性和團結等價值觀,但對經濟學家來說,最重要的是財政和貨幣政策的影響。新冠疫情使量化寬鬆政策(即央行購買特許銀行和機構投資者持有的金融資產)常態化。這以增加加拿大央行和其他央行持有的基礎貨幣儲備的形式提供了短期流動性。

雖然這在《價值觀》的討論中從未被提及,但在即將到來的競選活動中可能至關重要。保守黨領袖皮埃爾·波利耶夫一直在兜售弗裏德曼式的貨幣主義觀點,認為聯邦政府在新冠疫情期間不負責任地印鈔,並認為這導致了2022-23年的通脹。與波利耶夫的指控相反,現在普遍認為此次通脹事件是新冠疫情引發的供應短缺以及俄羅斯入侵烏克蘭導致的能源價格飆升的結果。所有這些都發生在卡尼的新書出版之後,因此,觀察前央行行長卡尼如何令人信服地駁斥這些論點將會非常有趣。

最後一場危機,即氣候變化,卡尼在擔任英格蘭銀行行長期間以及之後的任期內一直積極倡導應對。本書的“價值觀”部分強烈支持碳定價,並在後文中讚揚了加拿大的做法。然而,卡尼如今正準備取消加拿大碳定價的消費者層麵,這令人尷尬地提醒我們,政治因素可能會破壞良好的政策。

2020年離開英格蘭銀行後,卡尼還大力支持建立自願碳補償市場,這是他個人關切與金融背景的巧妙結合。但由於碳補償市場容易滋生大量欺詐活動,這項努力從未真正啟動。卡尼最近創辦的布魯克菲爾德資產管理公司(Brookfield Asset Management)以收購碳密集型地區的公司而聞名,表麵上是為了使其脫碳。

加拿大的下一步是什麽?

在本書的最後一部分,卡尼更廣泛地探討了政府和企業基於價值觀的領導力,並強調通過ESG報告等方式實現透明度和信息披露。同樣,他鼓勵高管薪酬過高,但並未呼籲提高最高邊際稅率或其他壓縮分配的措施,例如加強工會。

最後,卡尼重提競選總理的話題,並匯集了他積累的智慧,製定了“加拿大如何為所有人創造價值”的計劃。到目前為止,加拿大並非卡尼敘事的主角,因為他的視角更加全球化。事實上,他的加拿大故事缺乏對我們更深層次的、以主要資源出口為導向的理解,也缺乏對加拿大目前麵臨的具體跨省或區域挑戰的理解。

可惜的是,加拿大計劃中並沒有太多具體的政策細節,更多的是對這些政策的重申。

價值觀,但方式卻與普遍理解相悖。他的大部分政策建議似乎都圍繞著加強市場監管以改善其運作,同時對技術抱有積極的看法,並承諾“第四次工業革命”。

例如,團結並非指工會在支持工人獲得更好的工資和工作條件方麵所扮演的角色。相反,它更像是一種模糊的呼籲,呼籲教育和培訓,使工人掌握發展所需的技能。同樣,公平和責任並非指累進稅製和確保更公平的收入分配,而是呼籲市場通過審慎和信息披露更好地運作。

對於銀行家卡尼來說,韌性更多地在於識別和預防金融係統的係統性風險,而不是確保我們的建築和基礎設施能夠抵禦火災、幹旱、洪水和高溫。與此同時,可持續性則是指由政府通過碳定價、監管和財務披露設定的戰略方向所塑造的綠色投資機會。諷刺的是,卡尼對碳定價的支持正是他最有力的政策建議之一。

目前尚不清楚卡尼將如何應對我們社會中巨大的不平等、迅速惡化的氣候狀況以及新技術的陰暗麵及其取代大量工人的可能性。貿易因素也未納入考量,因為特朗普第二屆政府摧毀了加拿大與美國貿易的整個基礎,而以美國為霸權的戰後全球秩序也開始崩塌。

歸根結底,馬克·卡尼的價值觀主張不足以“為所有人建設一個更美好的世界”。你可以把卡尼從高盛帶走,但高盛的印記依然揮之不去。卡尼對我們是如何走到今天的,以及構建現代混合經濟的複雜性提供了深刻的理解,但卻回避了更根本的經濟挑戰。至於卡尼作為政治家,這一章仍未書寫。

Values: Building a Better World for All

https://www.amazon.ca/Values-Building-Better-World-All/dp/0771051557

March 16 2021 by Mark Carney (Author)

NATIONAL BESTSELLER • Winner of the 2021 National Business Book Award • Shortlisted for the 2021 Donner Prize

A bold and urgent argument by the Prime Minister of Canada and former bank governor on the radical, foundational change that is required if we are to build an economy and society based not on market values but on human values.

Our world is full of fault lines—growing inequality in income and opportunity; systemic racism; health and economic crises from a global pandemic; mistrust of experts; the existential threat of climate change; deep threats to employment in a digital economy with robotics on the rise. These fundamental problems and others like them, argues Mark Carney, stem from a common crisis in values. Drawing on the turmoil of the past decade, Mark Carney shows how “market economies” have evolved into “market societies” where price determines the value of everything.

When we think about what we, as individuals, value most highly, we might list fairness, health, the protection of our rights, economic security from poverty, the preservation of natural diversity, resources, and beauty. The tragedy is, these things that we hold dearest are too often the casualties of our twenty-first century world, where they ought to be our bedrock.

In this profoundly important new book, Mark Carney offers a vision of a more humane society and a practical manifesto for getting there. How we reform our infrastructure to make things better and fairer is at the heart of every chapter, with outlines of wholly new ideas that can restructure society and enshrine our human values at the core of all that we build for our children and grandchildren.

Mark Carney's Values: What his 2021 book reveals about the leader he might be

 

 

Mark Carney speaking at a podium

It’s fair to say that Mark Carney’s 2021 book, Values: Building a Better World for All, was his early application to be prime minister. Values covers a wide swath of economic history and philosophy, and gives us some clues into what makes our new prime minister tick.

At the end of its 531 pages, Carney lays out a hopeful vision for Canada, albeit one lacking a sharper focus on details. We can only conclude he is a very competent centrist whose plans for Canada won’t depart much from the status quo. In the face of the second Trump administration, many will feel that’s enough, but one can’t help wanting more.

When I first read Values upon its release, I was a little disappointed. I was hoping for more of a memoir: an insider take on the 2008-09 financial crisis when Carney was governor of the Bank of Canada, or a behind-the-scenes look at the early days of COVID-19 pandemic, during which Carney was at the helm of the Bank of England. There are a few tidbits of memoir in the book, but for the most part, Values is a book about economics, history and philosophy from someone who’s been at the highest echelons of the public and private sectors.

So what are the big ideas in Values and what does this tell us about the type of leader he would be? Carney is a strong believer in markets but acknowledges they need to be regulated for there to be decent outcomes. In a contrast to the Milton Friedman-inspired free market views of his Conservative adversary, Pierre Poilievre, Carney comments, “unchecked market fundamentalism devours the social capital essential for the long-term dynamism of capitalism itself.“

Values comes in three distinct parts: a historical and philosophical contemplation of the evolution of modern economies and monetary systems; a review of three modern crises (financial crisis, COVID-19 and climate change); and, a proactive agenda spanning leadership and directions for a successful modern economy. Underpinning a successful modern economy, he cites seven essential values and beliefs: dynamism, resilience, sustainability, fairness, responsibility, solidarity and humility. We’ll circle back to these below.

As you might have guessed, Values is a play on the different social and economic meanings of the word value. The values we have as humans are embedded in our economic and political institutions, which should ultimately transcend the more pecuniary values of what we consume or purchase. Carney has an excellent discussion of how early economists perceived economic value as objective—largely linked to the labour that went into making something—as opposed to the subjective value of modern economics, where worth is in the eye of the beholder, as determined by the cold logic of the marketplace.

What values?

A key distinction made by a number of contemporary economists is between value creation and value extraction. The latter represents activities that skim off the rest of the economy, as forms of unearned income (also called economic rents). Value extraction initially referred to the unearned income accruing to landlords or the value of natural resources as gifts of nature. In a modern economy, unearned income is more often related to state-sanctioned monopolies, including patents and copyrights, and the gatekeeper functions played by banks, ticketing companies and social media platforms.

Unfortunately, Carney only peeks behind the curtain of value extraction and unearned income before moving on. Perhaps because a deeper dive might hit too close to home, including Carney’s early years as a banker with Goldman Sachs. If you want a more thorough critique of value extraction and rent seeking, a better starting point would be Marianna Mazzucato’s The Value of Everything or Joseph Stiglitz’s The Price of Inequality.

That’s a missed opportunity because a few chapters later, Carney opines on the corrosive impact of growing inequality. He cites evidence from the OECD and IMF to support a view that “relative equality is good for growth” and that “more equal societies are more resilient, … are more likely to invest for the many not the few” but fails to connect the dots back to the causes of inequality. Nonetheless, we are left with a lingering concern that the acquisitive values of a market society may undermine other core values like altruism, generosity, solidarity and civic spirit.

Three crises

The middle part of Values interrogates the three great crises of the past quarter-century: the 2008-09 financial crisis, the 2020-21 COVID-19 pandemic and the relentless slow burn of climate change. The book contains decent overviews of history and government responses but the analysis feels light when considering the ring-side seat Carney had. 

On the financial crisis, Carney has more to say about an episode in 2007 than the full financial crisis itself that hit a year later. Carney was still at the Department of Finance when the Canadian market for asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP) was about to seize up. ABCP is a form of financial innovation known as securitization, which in this case means taking the stream of interest payments from corporate bonds (commercial paper) and repackaging them into assets that can be sold to pension funds and other investment funds.

Carney helped broker a deal on ABCP between London, New York and Canadian banks to get through the tight spot and avert a major crisis cascading through the financial markets. For the crisis we would have to wait a year, but those same fingerprints of financial innovation—the securitization of U.S. mortgages that bundled in the toxic assets of subprime mortgages—were all over the collapse and its spread to all corners of the world.

Carney became Bank of Canada governor in February 2008, but we don’t get any insight of how the Bank of Canada and Carney developed and implemented Canadian monetary policy when things fell apart that Fall. Instead, the narrative jumps to later efforts to elevate financial system stability through macroprudential regulation via the G20 and the Financial Stability Board—a club of elite central bankers and securities regulators. Thanks to these efforts, all is good, or so we’re told, but this is hardly reassuring as financial markets seem to leap from one bubble to the next.

Carney’s coverage of COVID-19 similarly lacks details about the unprecedented fiscal and monetary responses to the pandemic. The onset of economic shutdowns happened just as Carney was on his way out the door as Bank of England governor. It would have been fascinating reading to see how Carney and the Bank of England positioned themselves in the midst of such massive uncertainty. Instead, we get a diversion into the flaws of cost-benefit analysis and the misuse of indicators like statistical years of life that convert humans into dollars.

Carney speaks to rediscovered values like resilience and solidarity in the face of COVID-19, but it’s the impact of fiscal and monetary policies that matter most for economists. COVID-19 normalized quantitative easing, the purchase by central banks of financial assets held by chartered banks and institutional investors. This provided short-term liquidity in the form of increased reserves of base money held at the Bank of Canada and other central banks.

While this never comes up in the discussion in Values, it could be important in the election campaign to come. Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre has been peddling a Friedman-esque monetarist argument that the federal government irresponsibly printed money during COVID-19, which he says caused the 2022-23 inflation experience. In contrast to Poilievre’s allegations, this inflation episode is now widely believed to have been the result of COVID-induced supply shortages and the spike in energy prices from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. All of which occurred after the publication of Carney’s book, so it will be interesting to watch former central banker Carney credibly destroy these arguments.

The final crisis, climate change, is one for which Carney was a vocal advocate as Bank of England governor, and in his time since then. Values takes a strong position in favour of carbon pricing and, later in the book, praises Canada’s approach. It’s an awkward reminder of how politics can undermine good policy, as Carney is now set to eliminate the consumer side of Canadian carbon pricing.

After leaving the Bank of England in 2020, Carney also strongly supported the creation of voluntary carbon offset markets, an interesting marriage of his personal concerns and his finance background. This effort never really got off the ground due to the tendency of offset markets to generate vast amounts of fraudulent activity. Carney’s recent firm, Brookfield Asset Management, was known for buying companies in carbon-intensive areas ostensibly to decarbonize them.

What’s next for Canada?

In the book’s final section, Carney speaks more to broader conceptions of values-based leadership by governments and corporations, with an emphasis on transparency and disclosure through things like ESG reporting. In a similar vein, he prods excessive executive compensation without going so far as to call for higher top marginal tax rates or other measures that would compress the distribution, like stronger unions.

At the end, Carney returns to his bid for prime minister and compiles his accumulated wisdom towards a plan for “How Canada can Build Value for All.” Up to this point, Canada is not the main actor in Carney’s narrative, as he takes a more global perspective. Indeed, his Canadian story lacks an understanding of our deeper orientation towards staples resource exports or the specific interprovincial or regional challenges the country now faces.

Alas, there’s not too much tangible policy detail in the Canadian plan, more of a restatement of those seven values, but in ways that deviate from common understandings. Most of his policy prescriptions seem to be in the vein of better regulation of markets to improve their functioning, along with a positive outlook on technology and promises of a “fourth industrial revolution.”

For example, solidarity is not about the role of unions in supporting workers to get better wages and working conditions. Instead, it’s more of a vague appeal for education and training so that workers have the skills needed to thrive. Similarly, fairness and responsibility are not about progressive taxation and ensuring a more just distribution of income, but an appeal for markets to work better through prudence and disclosure.

For Carney, the banker, resilience has more to do with identifying and preventing systemic risks to the financial system rather than ensuring our buildings and infrastructure can survive fires, droughts, floods and heat domes. Meanwhile, sustainability is about green investment opportunities shaped by a strategic direction set by governments through carbon pricing, regulation and financial disclosure. Ironically, Carney’s support for carbon pricing is among his strongest policy recommendations.

It’s not clear how Carney would come to grips with the massive inequalities in our society, the rapidly declining state of the climate, and the dark side of new technologies and their potential to displace mass amounts of workers. Nor does trade factor in, as the second Trump administration collapses the whole basis for Canadian trade with the United States, and the post-war global order, with the United States as hegemonic power, starting to crumble.

At the end of the day, Mark Carney’s values proposition is not enough to “build a better world for all.” You can take the boy out of Goldman Sachs but the imprint of Goldman Sachs lingers. Carney offers up a solid understanding of how we got here, and the complexities of building a modern mixed economy, but skirts over more fundamental economic challenges. As for Carney the politician, that chapter remains unwritten.

[ 打印 ]
評論
目前還沒有任何評論
登錄後才可評論.