個人資料
正文

VPN Users Risk $1M in fines 20-Year Jail in US

(2023-03-30 07:21:04) 下一個

VPN Users Risk 20-Year Jail Sentences in the US Under New RESTRICT Act

https://beincrypto.com/vpn-users-risk-20-year-jail-sentences-us-restrict-act/?

By Martin Young 28 March 2023, Updated by Ali M.

In Brief
  • The 'TikTok Ban Bill' targets more than just social media.
  • The state would be able to police all communication platforms.
  • VPNs would be included with violators facing up to $1M in fines.
  • PROMO

A bill dubbed the ‘RESTRICT’ act that was submitted to Congress could have severe consequences for virtual private network (VPN) users in the United States.

U.S. lawmakers are widening their sights when it comes to cracking down on finance and technology.

The bipartisan “Restricting the Emergence of Security Threats that Risk Information and Communications Technology (RESTRICT)” act was unveiled in early March.

It was initially dubbed the “TikTok Ban Bill,” but it has far wider ramifications. Furthermore, VPN users could face hefty fines or jail sentences under the bill.

Communications and VPN Tech Targeted

People often legitimately use VPN (virtual private network) services to add an extra layer of security for web communications. Furthermore, they allow users to mask or change their internet address. Accessing content that may otherwise be blocked or censored is often required.

The bill, if passed, would attempt to identify “information and communications technology products and services holdings that pose undue or unacceptable risks.”

This could include VPNs if they are used to access banned websites such as TikTok. But that is not all.

The proposed legislation contains ambiguous phrases like “desktop programs,” “mobile apps,” “gaming platforms,” “payment solutions,” and “web applications.” It targets relevant software with a user base exceeding 1 million in the U.S.

Essentially, it intends to scrutinize a long list of communications technologies. These include web hosting, cloud services, content delivery services, drones, artificial intelligence, and e-commerce.

The bill specifically directs the Secretary of Commerce to “identify, deter, disrupt, prevent, prohibit, investigate, or otherwise mitigate” national security risks associated with technology linked to countries adversarial to the U.S.

The scary part is the potential punishment for violators. This includes fines of up to a million dollars or 20 years in jail, or both.

Balaji Srinivasan, the former CTO of Coinbase, maintains that The RESTRICT Act is reminiscent of China’s Great Firewall. It creates a virtual barrier within the United States, which emulates China’s strict internet control policies with the stated goal of competing with and surpassing the Asian powerhouse.

Srinivasan argues that it could lead to the erosion of internet freedom in the name of national competition.

Moving Forward With TikTok Ban

According to reports on March 27, lawmakers are moving forward with the bill. This follows the grilling of TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew last week. The Chinese social media platform has an estimated 150 million users in the United States.

House of Representatives speaker Kevin McCarthy said that the House would be moving forward with the bill because “TikTok can’t be honest.” He believes that China has access to TikTok user data. For this reason, McCarthy wants to “protect Americans from the technological tentacles of the Chinese Communist Party.”

Meanwhile, Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez took to TikTok to address the need for nationwide data and privacy protection policies. She stated that the core of the issue is not TikTok but social media companies collecting “troves of deeply personal data” from users.

If passed, the new legislation will grant the U.S. government sweeping powers to crack down on any technologies and services it sees as a threat. Remarkably, that includes VPN technology.

Those opposing the bill say it will give the state the power to police the entire internet and any platforms on it. Furthermore, some referred to it as the “Chinafication of America.”

The legislation is frighteningly similar to that in China, which has some of the world’s harshest internet censorship.

DISCLAIMER

In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content.

The RESTRICT Act: No, You Won’t Get 20 Years If You Use A VPN To Access TikTok

https://thedeepdive.ca/the-restrict-act-no-you-wont-get-20-years-if-you-use-a-vpn-to-access-tiktok/?

   JP Alegre  0 Comments 

Today’s geopolitical climate has seen the US, as well as other countries in the West, become increasingly concerned over national security risks posed by some foreign information and communications technology (ICT) products and services, primarily Chinese-owned TikTok.

In early March Senator Mark Warner, a Democrat from Virginia, introduced Senate Bill 686 or the Restricting the Emergence of Security Threats that Risk Information and Communications Technology Act (the RESTRICT Act) to help address this potential threat. 

Similar to the new enforcement guidelines by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), the proposed legislation focuses on business deals and interests that may impact national security.

People on social media are concerned that the new legislation would restrict regular people from using the foreign-owned app TikTok, with some, like Twitter user Lolo below, saying that using a VPN to access the app could put one in jail for 20 years.

This isn’t true. 

There is no mention of VPN or regular citizens accessing ICT services like TikTok in the current draft of the proposed legislation. 

The criminal penalty of 20 years, a fine of $1 million, or both, applies to entities proven to have willfully engaged in activities or attempts at activities that pose national security risks such as the “sabotage or subversion” of ICT products or services, “catastrophic effects” on critical infrastructure or digital economy, and interfering in the results of a federal election.

“To be extremely clear, this legislation is aimed squarely at companies like Kaspersky, Huawei, and TikTok that create systemic risks to the United States’ national security — not at individual users,” a spokesperson for Senator Warner told the Daily Dot.

TL:DR: looks like no one’s going to jail for posting another dance video on TikTok, no matter how bad it is.

What the new legislation aims to do, in its present iteration, is to give the US Secretary of Commerce and the President broad authority to enforce measures against ICT products or services and their providers owned or controlled by what it describes as “foreign adversaries” that are found to pose an undue or unacceptable risk to national security.

The bill, which is still in its very early stages, is already getting bipartisan support in the Senate, and the nod from the Biden administration.

[ 打印 ]
閱讀 ()評論 (0)
評論
目前還沒有任何評論
登錄後才可評論.