隴山隴西郡

寧靜純我心 感得事物人 寫樸實清新. 閑書閑話養閑心,閑筆閑寫記閑人;人生無虞懂珍惜,以沫相濡字字真。
個人資料
  • 博客訪問:
文章分類
歸檔
正文

Stanford Exp: Think out of the box creative, non-linear, asymmet

(2023-09-07 10:16:21) 下一個

Title: Unconventional Thinking Unleashed: Lessons from a Stanford Experiment

Introduction: Innovation often thrives when we dare to step outside the box, challenging conventions and embracing the unexpected. A captivating experiment conducted at Stanford Business School in 2009, orchestrated by the ingenious Professor Tina Seelig, brilliantly illustrates the transformative power of unconventional thinking. This experiment serves as an inspiring case study that sheds light on the essence of innovation, encouraging us to question assumptions, avoid distractions, and choose high-leverage approaches.

The Experiment: Professor Seelig presented her students with a deceptively simple challenge: Take $5 and two hours to generate the highest possible return on this initial investment. The twist? The students were to share their strategy and results with the class. What transpired next revealed the remarkable potential of creative, non-linear, asymmetric thinking.

The Conventional Path: The majority of student groups embarked on a conventional path. They used the $5 to buy items, engaged in barter or resale, and hoped to sell their final products for a marginally higher price. While this approach yielded modest returns, it was fundamentally linear and logical.

The Unconventional Trailblazers: However, a few visionary groups chose an entirely different path, seeing beyond the $5 and the constraints of time. They recognized a hidden gem—the presentation time in front of Stanford students. This "asset" was not just valuable; it was priceless.

Key Realizations:

Avoiding Distractions: The $5 was a distraction, a tempting pitfall that led many astray. Those who succeeded realized that the obvious solution was often the wrong one and had to be ignored.

Asking Foundational Questions: To break free from conventional thinking, one must ask fundamental questions that challenge underlying assumptions. What is the real problem to be solved? What are the core assumptions? What alternatives exist?

Selecting High Leverage Approaches: The winning group exercised patience and carefully evaluated their options. They selected the path most likely to yield asymmetric, risk-adjusted returns—a strategic choice that redefined the game.

Lessons Learned: This Stanford experiment illuminates three crucial steps for thinking differently and fostering innovation:

Step 1: Avoid the Distraction: Innovation often arises when we bypass seemingly straightforward solutions that lead us down well-trodden paths.

Step 2: Ask Foundational Questions: Deep and critical thinking is necessary to identify and challenge the assumptions that limit us.

Step 3: Select the High Leverage Approach: By evaluating options with an eye for unconventional, high-leverage strategies, we can create outcomes that defy conventional expectations.

Conclusion: Innovation isn't about following the crowd; it's about defying it. Professor Seelig's experiment and the bold approach of the winning group emphasize that creative, non-linear, asymmetric thinking can produce remarkable, asymmetric results. By embracing these lessons, we can propel ourselves beyond the boundaries of conventional thought, ignite our imaginations, and reshape the world around us. In the pursuit of innovation, let us dare to step outside the box, free our minds from distractions, and ask the questions that truly matter.

 

** 

[ 打印 ]
閱讀 ()評論 (0)
評論
目前還沒有任何評論
登錄後才可評論.