space

I just finished reading booklet of <The Brief History of Time> written by Stephen H.
The book's beginning part language usage is good, enjoyable. It is like Master's words and style, etc. But Gradually, The quality of the book degraded very much. Not only language usage, but also contents. It talked too many useless words, too rough in good contents. The illustration pictures could be much useful, and helpful. Nevertheless, I still learned (also by the help of other reading materials) the key point when talking general relativity. and felt human achievements in space study. I need to at least understand the underline meaning of Quantum Mechanics still though. I feel  bewilder if some of the theories have any reliable evidence such as matter/anti-matter, the existence of virtual pairs in empty space. Despite of these suspicious, I have got a better view when scientist talking about universe (different from space in concept), universe's time. our world etc.



Okay, this is only a test blog :)








第二篇日記: 我愛的女人不愛我.
還有5分鍾,看個好玩的.正好就看到了這篇原闖:
http://bbs.wenxuecity.com/origin/583604.html







wenxuecity 真難用啊, 破編輯器,還要先去學習怎麽用.一點都 not intuitive. 到了今天什麽都是標準化了,難道文學城就還要與世界隔絕? 大到google, facebook, 小到地方網站www.51.ca 那個都是標準用法. 難道今天翻個書,是否也得去先看個說明? 真見鬼.和文學城88. ;)

[小燕子28]

Have a nice day!