小孩子打疫苗針後應該如何妥善處理

有個母親給自己看病的時候問我，她的兒子沒有什麽“火”，要怎麽辦？我說，什麽叫沒有“火”？她說，就是她兒子不會發火，老是被別人欺負， 16 歲的小孩，一米六的個頭，但是比他小比他瘦小的小孩子都會經常欺負他，麻煩的是他從來不會發火。她說，我老是教他不能任人欺負，要打回他，他卻說不行的，老師說過不能打人的。真是給他氣死。我聽了哈哈大笑。這母親接著說，這兒子看起來比我還高大，但是經常被人欺負，時不時會看到他被幾個小孩子追著打。

我聽了心裏覺得這不大對路，怎麽會這樣？是不是有什麽問題？接著這母親就自己說出了答案了，她說，醫生說他有甲狀腺低下。我說，哦，原來是這樣，甲狀腺低下當然就沒有火了。不過，小孩子無端端的為什麽會得甲狀腺低下的病呢？這母親說，是啊，不知道為什麽。我腦筋轉了幾轉，很快就有個想法，又是疫苗惹的禍？我說，大概是他以前打疫苗針造成的吧。打疫苗針有很多的副作用，比如說自閉症之類的。。。這母親馬上接著說，是了，是了，我兒子四歲的時候醫生曾經說他有過自閉症，很怕人，躲在桌子下不敢見人。我一拍桌子，說，這不就是了嗎？這母親接著說，這兒子真的不太對勁，這麽大個人還沒有什麽羞恥感，我有時候故意試探他，在他洗澡的時候說要進去（洗澡間）拿點東西，他都毫無感覺的說，好啊，你進來拿吧。我說，你沒有穿衣服不怕嗎？他卻說，你不是拿了（東西）就走嗎？真是被他氣死。我聽了又是哈哈大笑。

基本上這小孩子的情況是屬於中醫裏的五遲（緩）現象，氣虛加腦髓發育不足。需要後天大力補養才行。那些人參鹿茸附子硫磺什麽的，有什麽就用什麽就對了。

不過這裏想說的是疫苗的問題。疫苗注射可能是有用的，但現在卻有過濫的跡象，什麽病都要發明一個疫苗來防治。這個世界每天都會有新奇的病菌出現，那是不是最終每種病菌都要弄個疫苗來注射呢？身體能夠無限止的承受這麽多的病毒病菌嗎？為什麽中醫會反對疫苗呢？因為疫苗直接注射進入身體的血液，身體的內部。中醫的理論是禦敵於國門之外，病越深入就越難治，相反，治病的時候，病情越是往外發展就越好。而疫苗注射就剛好和這理論相違背。

有個賓夕凡尼亞州的小女孩，得了紅斑狼瘡，我細問她發病的來龍去脈，結果發現就是因為她四歲半的時候打的疫苗針，當時的症狀就是發燒，全身發青斑，全身關節痛，沒有胃口，和便秘。從此之後就開始尋醫問藥的漫漫長路。我看著她天真無邪的樣子真是覺得很可憐。

再有前麵說過的那個 11 歲的小女孩 ，得了一型糖尿病。起因也是因為 5 歲的時候打的疫苗針。大家為人父母，對疫苗針的東西真的不可不慎。

那有沒有可能不打疫苗針呢？也有，就是用宗教理由。很可惜，中國人大多數是無神論者，沒有宗教信仰，所以沒有辦法走這條路。各位網友如果還沒有生孩子，趕緊去信個某某宗教現在還來得及。要不大家就隻能夠 Home Schooling 了。

我因為計劃不周，所以生了孩子才意識到這件大事，臨時抱佛腳已經來不及了。所以我的小孩打疫苗針的時候心裏總是有點擔心，怕出什麽事。事實上小孩子打針後每次的反應都是很明顯的，比如說會有輕微發燒，精神比較差，胃口下降，如果還在喝奶的階段就很容易吐奶。所幸兵來將擋，水來土掩，我的對策就是每次小孩子打針後就讓她們吃一點中藥，如人參黃芪等等，很少一點就夠了。意思就是加強她們的抵抗力，這樣就不至於千裏之堤，潰於一穴，有備無患。

這裏有個關於疫苗造成自閉症的真實案例匯總：

http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/ChineseMed/12554457.html

[hi_sunflower]

有人說碘鹽過多cause hypo thyroid. seems more true to me.

[醫者意也]

回複iamhereforfun的評論:
仔細的讀我的文字，答案都在裏麵。

[醫者意也]

回複iamhereforfun的評論:
你可以相信西醫和疫苗，這完全是你的自由，我的論點論據都在那裏，關於疫苗造成自閉症的的真實案例匯總也在那裏，你如果硬要視而不見我也沒有辦法，隻有尊重你的信仰。

[iamhereforfun]

If you don't mind, let me ask you a separate question (irrelevant to your article) --- So, do you mean you have NOT let your child taken ANY immunization after your child's birth ? Neven taken ANY ? And how old is your child now ?

[iamhereforfun]

回複醫者意也的評論:
You can believe whatever you believe. my point is -- In the beginning of your article, you listed an example, then you have to provide some supporting points to show readers that it is a good example that caused by taking immunization.

if you just mention a medical case, and then you say you believe it is caused by taking immunization, then nobody can understand why. This is different from OJ case. For OJ case, we have blood DNA evidence, we have witness seeing him around the crime scene, etc. For the first example, I really don't see you provided any connection.

[happywind]

醫生你好，能否給我qqh發你診所電話地址。我在MD，有朋友癌症第一期，想把你推薦給她。非常感謝。

[ONCOCIDIA]

Be careful to what you are talking about and see the following case.

http://blog.the-scientist.com/2010/05/24/autism-doc-yes-that-one-banned-in-uk/

Autism doc (yes, that one) banned in UK

The UK has prohibited Andrew Wakefield from practicing medicine — you’ll remember him as the first to publish a peer-reviewed report linking autism to the MMR vaccine, in The Lancet in 1998 (which has since been retracted). Additional research has failed to find a connection between autism and any vaccine.

According to the Associated Press, since this paper, UK vaccination rates have not returned to their former levels, and each year brings outbreaks of measles.

The UK’s General Medical Council found Wakefield guilty of serious professional misconduct, based on how he carried out his research. He has set up a practice in the U.S., and can appeal the ruling.

What’s your reaction to this latest news?

Alison McCook, Deputy Editor, The Scientist

[醫者意也]

回複iamhereforfun的評論:
打個比方，人人都知道是OJ Simpson 殺了他妻子，但是卻沒辦法去證明這件事。

疫苗的東西，你不信盡管可以讓你孩子去打，這是你的自由和選擇。我相信疫苗的危害性，所以我願意采取預防和補救措施。

[iamhereforfun]

You did not prove why the first teen's hypo thyroid was caused by immunization. All his mother provided information was --
1. her child is weak in personality
2. You told her "immunization may cause autism and other problem." Then her mom said "he had symptom similar to autism".

Then you were "excied" to "prove" this is a case caused by immunization. First, Nobody really confirmed that kid did have autism. Second;y, even he had autism, there are hundreds things may cause autism, why it was caused by immunization ? Did his mom tell you he just started having autism symptom right after the immunization ?

If you knew this example is not a proved case for immunization problem, then what's the point of talking about it first ??