萬斯說漏嘴了，說他們創作了故事。 他的原話： “If I have to create stories so that the American media actually pays attention to the suffering of the American people, then that’s what I’m going to do, Dana.” (“如果我必須創作故事，以便美國媒體真正關注美國人民的苦難，那麽這就是我要做的，達納。”) 之後被主持人問了幾次後，狡辯說，是他的選民告訴他的。問題： 1）哪個選民告訴他的？ 如果他的選民告訴他知道海地移民吃狗貓，這是犯罪行為，他當時為什麽不報警？ 2）當時不報警，現在報警也可以，現在也可以提供選民的名字，讓警察和媒體核實。
Vance specifically took credit for popularizing the story, trying to connect the story with isolated incidents of immigrants committing murder, telling Bash, “The American media totally ignored this stuff until Donald Trump and I started talking about cat memes.”
Bash tried to interrupt to note that their claims aren’t just memes, but Vance kept talking and adding, “If I have to create stories so that the American media actually pays attention to the suffering of the American people, then that’s what I’m going to do, Dana.”
The CNN anchor again interrupted, pointing out, “You just said that you’re creating the story.” In a long, awkward pause, Vance said nothing and asked Bash to repeat herself, which she did multiple times, adding, “Sir, you just said that you’re creating the story. You just said that this is a story that you created, so the eating dogs and cats thing is not… accurate.”
Vance started talking before Bash had finished but argued that he didn’t mean he was making the story up, but instead, “Dana, it comes from firsthand accounts from my constituents. I say that ‘we’re creating a story’ meaning we’re creating the American media focusing on it.”
大家可以去讀一下這個采訪的詳細筆錄，看萬斯是否是撒謊。
1. 主持人上來問他 ，春田市的市長說，政客的言論，對春田市造成了傷害。並問, 川普在辯論中提到海地移民吃狗吃貓，但這個最初是你把這個謠言放大。你為什那麽在你的州的官員都講沒有證據並請求你停止的時候，你還這麽做？
2. 萬斯回答： 在我和川普提出這些關切之前，春田市是被媒體忽略的。然後他講春田市的學校、醫院擁擠等。 他提到有10幾個選民給他反映問題。（他這裏用的是： my constituents are telling me） 但是他回避了吃狗吃貓的事。 他說，舉例來說，媒體說我說移民逮鵝吃鵝是無根據的。但確實有911報警關於這樣的事。
3. 主持人說：那個郡的警長和州衛生部門，查了過去11個月的911報警記錄，隻有2起說海地人從公園把鵝拿走，但是零的證據能證明這些主張。
4. 主持人和萬斯來來回回爭辯後，萬斯最後說，是他的選民先談論吃狗吃貓的事。 my constituents were the ones who talked about eating dog and cats。 注意，他這裏用的是"talked" 的這個詞，而不是象上麵用的，my constituents are telling me)。 他說的，應該就是最初他那個州有個人發推關於海地人吃狗的事，那個人後來後悔道歉。而她的推被萬斯轉發放大，被川普在辯論時引用。 萬斯在川普辯論完，自己說，網上傳的事，有些可能最後被證明是謠言。
5. 結論： 萬斯在這個采訪中，仍沒有出示證據，有海地移民吃狗吃貓。 但他說因為他和川普提了這件事，春田市不再被忽略了，引起了人們的關注。
那麽總結他的核心意思：撒謊海地移民吃狗吃貓，才引起了人們對春田市學校醫院等擁擠的關注。這個沒有冤枉他。
想想某著名過世的預言家的預言吧，2027第三次世界大戰。
想想某人無意中穿越到2027年卻發現空無一人的他回來後的描述吧。
Only once chance=萬斯，他莫不是外星人給美國和人類的一次生存機會？
美國還有智商完整和理智的人嗎？如果沒有，那真是連累大家了。
naifen123 發表評論於 2024-09-16 14:34:56
China isn’t outcompeting with any country but itself, you don’t have to like china, but smearing it will certainly not make you.
To the us, if you continuously complete with others because jealous, you fall in trouble which made by self, but if you continuously complete with yourself to learn others’, you will be better.
En china priorisaron la educacion, ei que ca dar requeza en un pais es la inverstingacion cientidica.在中國，教育是首位，能給國家帶來財富的是科研。
Vance specifically took credit for popularizing the story, trying to connect the story with isolated incidents of immigrants committing murder, telling Bash, “The American media totally ignored this stuff until Donald Trump and I started talking about cat memes.”
Bash tried to interrupt to note that their claims aren’t just memes, but Vance kept talking and adding, “If I have to create stories so that the American media actually pays attention to the suffering of the American people, then that’s what I’m going to do, Dana.”
The CNN anchor again interrupted, pointing out, “You just said that you’re creating the story.” In a long, awkward pause, Vance said nothing and asked Bash to repeat herself, which she did multiple times, adding, “Sir, you just said that you’re creating the story. You just said that this is a story that you created, so the eating dogs and cats thing is not… accurate.”
Vance started talking before Bash had finished but argued that he didn’t mean he was making the story up, but instead, “Dana, it comes from firsthand accounts from my constituents. I say that ‘we’re creating a story’ meaning we’re creating the American media focusing on it.”