評論: 川普美女公關大員上庭 抽泣指證前老板:他否認出軌AV女

隻有登錄用戶才能發表評論,點擊此處登錄    返回新聞帖
櫻色 發表評論於 2024-05-05 21:41:49
這個女孩不錯,當初她被民主黨逼迫離開白宮時,川普保護了她
現在她沒有屈服於民主黨的淫威,回報前老板,好樣的

遊泳愛好者 發表評論於 2024-05-05 12:30:35
回密林深處 發表評論於 2024-05-05 11:23:33

本人看過Fox5 news,他們的記者說:
Another bombshell revelation, Hicks recounted a conversation with Trump......
證明川普是知道Michael Cohen給Stormy Daniels付錢的事,可川普一再說他不知道。

這世界上有很多不同的人,不同的看法。本人沒有被蒙騙,更談不上吃虧。
密林深處 發表評論於 2024-05-05 11:23:33
遊泳愛好者 發表評論於 2024-05-05 10:07:55
這是CNN的報道,跟這篇中文報道相反:
============
這位喜歡遊泳的網友,看新聞的時候要看兩邊的,不然你會被騙的。
美女公關作證後,Fox評論說足以迫使檢方放棄起訴,CNN的評論則說“將川普推向了更危險的境界”。
檢方指控的罪名是“幹涉大選“,川普辯稱是”保護家庭“。此證人證言是”保護家庭“,有利於川普,不利於檢方,Fox評論正確,CNN評論錯誤。
所以說遊泳網友吃虧了,被人蒙騙了。
Sweetliquid 發表評論於 2024-05-05 10:26:00
抽字用得好
遊泳愛好者 發表評論於 2024-05-05 10:25:34
Google翻譯:

在唐納德·特朗普的曼哈頓選舉幹擾案審判中,案件進展好於預期,這對這位前總統來說是一個不祥之兆。

周四對基思·戴維森(Keith Davidson)的檢查中的一個關鍵時刻就證明了這一點。 戴維森是一名律師,曾代表凱倫·麥克杜格爾和斯托米·丹尼爾斯,因為他們的封口費是與特朗普前律師邁克爾·科恩協商支付的——據稱這些報酬是影響選舉計劃的一部分。

盡管戴維森隻是這部劇中的配角,但他在談判所謂向丹尼爾斯付款的過程中所扮演的角色,使他成為了重要的證人,陳述了所謂的“抓殺”陰謀的基本事實,並證實了前美國媒體報道的細節 , Inc. 首席執行官兼國家詢問報出版商 David Pecker 成立,科恩最終將作證。

也許戴維森早上作證時最戲劇性的時刻是當他被問及 2016 年選舉之夜與迪倫·霍華德(《國家詢問報》前編輯,幫助促成該報道的談判)的短信交流時。 檢方要求戴維森解釋他當晚發給霍華德的短信的含義。 當特朗普即將舉行大選時,戴維森給霍華德發短信詢問:“我們做了什麽?”

戴維森證詞的驚人之處在於它可能已經實現了這一目的。 因此,即使不需要證明改變獲勝者的計劃有效,提醒陪審團以及法庭上的我們所有人這種可能性也極大地強調了被指控的罪行的一個關鍵要素。

檢方不斷想方設法告訴陪審員,他們花了幾周的時間來權衡一個並非微不足道的問題,但對我們的選舉和民主的誠實至關重要。 我們將看看他們最終做出裁決時是否同意。
遊泳愛好者 發表評論於 2024-05-05 10:24:16
這是關於五月二日的另一個證人Keith Davidson:

In Donald Trump’s Manhattan election interference trial, the case is coming in better than expected, and that is ominous for the former president.

A key moment in Thursday’s examination of Keith Davidson illustrated that. Davidson is an attorney who represented both Karen McDougal and Stormy Daniels as their hush money payments were negotiated with former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen — payoffs alleged to have been part of the election influence scheme.

Although Davidson is just a supporting actor in this drama, his role in negotiating the alleged payment to Daniels makes him an important witness to lay down the basic facts of the alleged “catch and kill” plot — and to corroborate the details that former American Media, Inc. CEO and National Enquirer publisher David Pecker established and Cohen will ultimately testify about.

Perhaps the most dramatic moment of Davidson’s morning testimony came when he was asked about an election night 2016 text message exchange with Dylan Howard — a former editor of the National Enquirer who helped broker the negotiations for the story. The prosecution asked Davidson to explain the meaning of a text he had sent to Howard that evening. As the election was about to be called for Trump, Davidson sent a text to Howard asking, “What have we done?”

What was striking about Davidson’s testimony is that it might have achieved that purpose. So even if proving that the scheme to change the winner worked is not required, reminding the jury — and all of us in the courtroom — of the possibility dramatically underlined a key element of the alleged offense.

The prosecution is constantly finding ways to tell jurors that they are giving weeks of their life to weigh a matter that is not trivial, but critical for the honesty of our elections and our democracy. We will see if they agree when they ultimately deliver their verdict.
莫言無語 發表評論於 2024-05-05 10:11:07
土共赤裸裸造謠到不遮掩的地步,真是人類邪惡的敗類。
遊泳愛好者 發表評論於 2024-05-05 10:10:56
這是一段原文:
Another devastating blow came at the very end of Hicks’ direct testimony when she revealed a stunning trifecta: that, while president, Trump had admitted to her that he knew his then-fixer Michael Cohen had paid Daniels, that Trump attempted to blame Cohen and that Hicks did not believe him. She also stated that Trump felt it was better to be dealing with it after the election than beforehand. She appeared so distraught — presumably about throwing her former boss under the bus — that she then began crying.

Google翻譯:
希克斯的直接證詞最後帶來了另一個毀滅性的打擊,她透露了令人震驚的三連勝:在擔任總統期間,特朗普向她承認,他知道當時的經紀人邁克爾·科恩付給了丹尼爾斯,特朗普試圖責怪科恩和丹尼爾斯。 希克斯不相信他。 她還表示,特朗普認為在選舉後處理這個問題比選舉前更好。 她看起來非常心煩意亂——大概是要把她的前老板扔到公共汽車下——然後她開始哭泣。
遊泳愛好者 發表評論於 2024-05-05 10:07:55
這是CNN的報道,跟這篇中文報道相反:

Opinion: Hope Hicks’ testimony was a nightmare for Trump
******cnn***/2024/05/03/opinions/hope-hicks-trump-hush-money-trial-eisen/index.html?iid=cnn_buildContentRecirc_end_recirc

Opinion: How one text exchange gave Trump an ominous day in court
******cnn***/2024/05/02/opinions/keith-davidson-testimony-trump-ominous-day-in-court-eisen

ztgp3614 發表評論於 2024-05-05 09:42:00
看看那個傾家蕩產蹲監獄的設計公司老板就知道她為什麽會哭了。她作證有利於川普,估計她很快就會有醜聞出現,現在民主黨讓人蹲監獄還需要證據嗎?
侃就侃一侃吧 發表評論於 2024-05-05 09:33:23
自我安慰?LOL,根本用不著。喬州女檢察官的事,紐約等著沒收私人財產的判決,現在是把共和黨總統候選人困在法庭。種種醜行你們好意思做,我們都不好意思直接說,太過肮髒了。

你們幾隻小小川黑等著人家爆猛料,結果又一次失望了。
Idado 發表評論於 2024-05-05 09:32:00
她實際上是替川普辯護。指掩蓋的原因是川普在意他的婚姻,而非大選。
小毛er 發表評論於 2024-05-05 09:23:33
叫她否認風暴女的事也沒什麽大不了的。當時她是公關。當然要護著老板的。哭也真的是沒必要。
渤海 發表評論於 2024-05-05 09:20:46
".. 儘管外界一度認為,希克斯將“爆大鑊”,惟她在庭上並未透露對川普特別不利的證供。"..
呐尼?黑皮肥豬這不得哭暈在廁所?廢物利用做成肉夾饃,都得散發著尿騷和屎臭。
龍口 發表評論於 2024-05-05 09:18:11
川粉自我安慰
侃就侃一侃吧 發表評論於 2024-05-05 09:07:44
她是檢方的證人,如果是蛇鼠一窩,那也是和檢方蛇鼠一窩。不過遺憾的是,她被迫出庭,並沒有向檢方希望的那樣出賣自己的良知。
令胡衝 發表評論於 2024-05-05 08:52:27


最後一句讓人好笑。美女出庭作證什麽料也沒給,結果扯了一頓暴風女故事,也能成文章賺稿費。等著以後AI都踢飯碗吧。


頁次:1/1 每頁50條記錄, 本頁顯示117, 共17  分頁:  [1]