個人資料
  • 博客訪問:
文章分類
正文

Vince Cable 超級大國的衝突

(2026-03-10 02:05:46) 下一個

超級大國的衝突 | 文斯·凱布爾爵士 | TEDxDurham

Clash of the Superpowers | Sir Vince Cable | TEDxDurham

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXAt2g43SsI

 TEDx Talks   Dec 22, 2025

TEDx演講

2025年12月22日

三個世紀以來,西方一直主導著全球政治、經濟和文化。但這個時代正在終結。隨著美國逐漸退出其作為世界霸主的角色,中國和印度——兩國人口總和幾乎占世界人口的一半——正在崛起。中國目前已與美國並駕齊驅,成為世界最大的經濟體,而印度有望在2050年超越美國。

這種翻天覆地的變化對全球貿易、國際法以及應對氣候變化意味著什麽?文斯·凱布爾憑借其作為經濟學家和高級政府官員數十年的經驗,從內部視角解讀了重塑世界格局的力量,以及權力向東方傾斜後的未來圖景。文斯·凱布爾爵士最為人熟知的身份是自由民主黨領袖和聯合政府時期的商業、創新與技能大臣。作為殼牌石油公司前首席經濟學家,他以敏銳的經濟洞察力而聞名,並被認為是最早預警2008年金融危機的知名人士之一。

目前,文斯是倫敦政治經濟學院的客座教授,並筆耕不輟。他的最新著作《超越西方:中國、印度與新世界的形成》(Eclipsing the West: China, India & the Forging of a New World)將於2025年秋季由曼徹斯特大學出版社出版。他之前的著作包括《風暴》(The Storm,2009)、《風暴之後》(After the Storm,2015)、《敞開的雙臂》(Open Arms,2017)、《金錢與權力》(Money and Power,2021)和《中國難題》(The Chinese Conundrum,2022)。本次演講是在TEDx活動上進行的,該活動采用TED大會的形式,但由當地社區獨立組織。了解更多信息,請訪問 https://www.ted.com/tedx

我要談談我長期以來一直非常感興趣的一個話題:是什麽讓國家發展壯大,從貧窮走向富裕?中國一直以來都是研究這一過程的經典案例。我最初接觸中國是在成為國會議員之前,當時我在國際石油公司殼牌擔任首席經濟學家。大約30年前,他們派我去中國。那時中國剛剛走出一段混亂時期,經曆了負貅山事件。你們可能還記得文化大革命,以及之前的大饑荒,那場饑荒可能奪去了2000萬到3000萬人的生命。一位傑出的人物——董查平——接任了領導,他致力於將中國改造成一個融合共產主義和資本主義的體製。而且,他成功了。

在經曆了幾個世紀的停滯之後,中國突然煥發了生機。經濟快速增長,數億人擺脫了貧困。他理應被譽為上世紀最偉大的人物之一。但我當時被派往那裏是為了做出判斷。你知道,是否應該在該國投資大量資金,而他們也確實這樣做了。之後我投身政界,在聯合政府中,我被派回中國與中國人討論英國的商業合作。離開政壇後,我一直試圖更深入地研究中國。我剛從中國回來,與參觀佛教寺院的中國學生和藝術家交流,試圖更好地了解這個國家。但不幸的是,最初被視為雙贏合作關係的局麵已經徹底惡化。這並非《侏羅紀公園》,而是上周在韓國一家酒店房間裏的一張照片,照片中,世界上最有權勢的兩個人會麵,討論日益增多的問題,即所謂的“脫鉤”。中美曾經緊密相連,蘋果電腦、特斯拉汽車等產品,兩個經濟體曾經緊密相連,但現在,在新冠疫情之後,它們無疑正在脫鉤。呃,芯片戰爭,美國從中國撤回關鍵技術,中國通過關稅進行報複,呃,中國則以

扣留重要的稀有金屬作為回應,呃,關於網絡戰的爭論,呃,北極冰川融化水域的競爭,海底電纜承載著全球互聯網,破壞和間諜活動的危險,等等。嗯,我們在英國和台灣都經曆過這些,當然台灣不僅僅是政治問題。台灣恰好擁有工廠,也就是所謂的代工廠,生產世界上最先進的半導體或芯片。現在,這不僅僅關乎中國和印度。我認為我們確實需要了解其背後的原因。

一些趨勢。抱歉,你知道,這裏用了一些數學,但是呃,這條綠線非常重要。它代表了過去一代人正在發生的事情。讓我們回到1919年。

世界上較貧窮的國家、新興經濟體、亞洲、非洲、拉丁美洲,其經濟總量占世界經濟的比重從約40%增長到約60%。而美國、歐洲和日本(紫色線所示)的經濟總量則在下降。因此,我們經曆了巨大的變革。

是什麽推動了這一變革?紅色線代表發展中的亞洲,其下方是黑色線,主要代表中國,但也包括中國和印度一起。

現在,那都是過去的事了。過去的事情可能會延續,也可能不會。你知道,中國現在麵臨一些經濟問題,房地產泡沫正在破滅。嗯,美國或許會因為人工智能革命而迎來新的發展機遇。我們看到那裏正在發生一些非凡的事情,尤其是在股市上。但更有可能的情況是,類似這樣的事情會發生。

我剛才引用了經合組織(OECD)——這個富豪俱樂部——對25年後世界格局的預測,基於一些合理的預測。你會看到,到那時,中國的經濟規模將是美國的兩倍,這其實並不令人驚訝。我的意思是,中國的人口是美國的四倍,而且現在是一個非常發達的國家。所以,為什麽不呢?真正令人驚訝的是印度,它現在正在效仿中國的道路。經濟增長非常非常快,正在迅速追趕。但我今天想談的是印度。還有印度尼西亞,它有可能成為世界第四大經濟體。實際上,就經濟規模而言,它已經超越了英國。

但我隻想談談中國和美國之間的巨大對抗,這或許是我們這一代人麵臨的最主要問題,而且這種對抗發生在多個層麵,但不僅僅關乎經濟。這關係到地球的未來,關乎溫室氣體排放和全球變暖。如果你看一下中間那一欄,你會發現,像我們這樣的發達國家,人均溫室氣體排放量更高,這與我們的生活習慣有關,比如開車等等。但是,全球最大的溫室氣體排放國是中國,而且遙遙領先,這主要是因為中國的現代化進程。

如果要解決全球變暖和氣候變化問題,主要將由中國來解決。無論他們是否合作,我們都生活在同一個星球上。我們必須與他們合作。他們是最大的問題,但他們也擁有解決方案。他們的技術比我們先進得多。那麽,西方與中國,特別是美國與中國之間的競爭進展如何呢?

在一個關鍵方麵,中國已經遙遙領先。他們主導著世界製造業貿易,規模幾乎是美國的兩倍。嗯,我剛從中國回來。你乘坐時速200英裏的火車,穿過中國東南部的工業中心地帶。你會感到震撼,就像19世紀中期到訪廷賽德或曼徹斯特的遊客一樣。

目之所及,綿延數英裏的工廠,巨大的發展正在發生。而且這些工廠高度精密。它們不再僅僅是服裝和玩具。它們是先進製造業,其能力和工藝水平遠超世界其他任何國家。所以,這是中國贏得的一場戰役。

而特朗普的回應是加征關稅。如果你想了解為什麽會有“讓美國再次偉大”(MAGA)和特朗普,請看上一張幻燈片。

他們失去了製造業,憤怒和沮喪,這就是特朗普的報複。你看,自內戰以來,美國的關稅一直在穩步下降,期間有過幾次中斷,一次是特朗普的英雄——麥金利總統被刺殺,另一次是兩次世界大戰之間的時期,當時美國的關稅加劇了我們都遭受的世界經濟大蕭條。

但自羅斯福以來,美國開始向世界開放,削減關稅,直到特朗普上台,政策逆轉。我們不知道這將把美國引向何方,但這完全改變了方向,美國正在轉向內向型經濟。但在製造業方麵,中國顯然已經勝出。科技領域的情況則更難判斷。嗯,中國在所有現代技術領域都處於領先地位。幾周前,一項澳大利亞研究表明,在約30至50項核心技術中,中國可能在約30項技術上處於領先地位。但簡單瀏覽一下左側的內容,你會發現芯片,尤其是微芯片,是所有新型空中技術的基礎。美國人遙遙領先。而且他們還能利用台灣的代工廠來生產這些芯片。但是,過去兩三年裏,中國人以驚人的速度迎頭趕上,投入巨資,似乎正在迎頭趕上,這著實令人震驚。證據就在第二欄,人工智能。我們之前假設,美國大型科技公司已經基本掌控了這項技術。你們大多數人可能都用過Chatg。

然而,出乎所有人意料的是,六個月前,中國人開發出了DeepSeeker,它擁有與之相當的強大功能,而且他們是通過一些變通方法實現的。他們無法獲得大型芯片,所以他們憑借巧妙的創新找到了其他方法,並且從那時起開發出了兩到三種先進的學習模型。再看看其他一些例子,比如綠色能源、風能等等。

就技術發展而言,中國在太陽能領域遙遙領先,而愚蠢的是,美國人卻放棄了這項我們本世紀餘下時間都需要的技術。

即使是核能,目前世界上大約四分之三的反應堆都是中國製造的。中國明顯領先的另一個領域是電信。華為。這其中還有一段與英國有關的故事,我稍後再談。還有一些其他領域,甚至包括量子物理。我之所以對這個領域感興趣,是因為我兒子是矽穀的一位量子物理學家。20年前,沒人會費心去讀中國關於這個主題的文章。當時中國在這方麵非常落後,而現在他們已經大致與中國並駕齊驅了。我們看到這種情況在各個領域都普遍存在。但就目前而言,你知道,在技術方麵,雙方勢均力敵,不過,在某一方麵,美國人顯然領先。他們擁有主導貨幣。人們,你知道,使用美元。商業使用美元。它安全、便捷,我們信任它直到特朗普上台。嗯,但隨著時間的推移,多年來,甚至在特朗普之前,各國逐漸放棄在交易中使用美元。很多國家在看到美國對俄羅斯實施製裁時感到害怕,因為美國控製著貨幣體係。

因此,現在正在加速一個進程,美國正在擺脫在唯一一個領域擁有無可爭議的領先優勢,那就是對世界貨幣及其儲備的控製。

那麽這一切將走向何方?嗯,別太困惑。但這是我在殼牌公司時與同事們共同開發的一種思考未來的方法。你如何看待25年後的未來?試圖預測是沒有意義的。

太多不確定的事情正在發生。所以最好的方法是講述合乎邏輯、連貫的故事。嗯,它們可能真也可能假,但它們確實能給我們描繪出一幅圖景,我們可以嚐試記住它、思考它,並挑戰它。其中一個故事是,在經曆了這場科技戰、脫鉤以及正在發生的烏克蘭戰爭之後,世界將落入拜登開始構建的模式,即建立一個全球聯盟來對抗中國,這個聯盟由歐洲和美國組成,其中印度至關重要,是安全盟友。這就是所謂的“四方安全對話”(Quad)。這是一個由日本、美國、日本和澳大利亞組成的聯盟。這並非不可能。嗯

但如果這曾經是一個故事的話,特朗普通過背叛自己的盟友以及在貿易問題上反複無常的做法,徹底扼殺了它,這可能高估了西方的力量,正如我之前指出的,西方的經濟正在衰退。

所以,你還有另一個故事,它來自所謂的“磚塊集團”,也就是來自所謂“全球南方”的強大國家,不僅僅是中國,呃,還有巴西、南非、尼日利亞、沙特阿拉伯以及其他國家,呃,世界正在變成某種多極格局。你不再隻有一個超級大國。你有美洲的美國,東歐的俄羅斯,呃,海灣地區的沙特阿拉伯,東亞的中國。嗯,這算是世界發展的一種可能方式,但同時也非常危險,因為這樣一來,就沒有人對我們共同麵臨的重大問題負責了。你知道,比如氣候變化、抗擊疫情、應對經濟災難,比如2008年那樣的危機。這就引出了另一個故事,特朗普正在推動,那就是國際機構的衰敗。

你知道,世界貿易組織不再運作。氣候大會,美國不會參加,於是就出現了漩渦。沒有人掌控局麵。世界體係逐漸瓦解,這很可能導致災難,而災難之後,體係也可能重生。我希望這一切能有一個樂觀的結局,但未來發展的方式有很多種。

所以,最後我想和大家分享幾點。

嗯,你為什麽要關心這些?

這重要嗎?當然重要,因為我們作為一個國家,有時也作為個人,現在都麵臨著選擇。我在政府任職時,麵臨一個重大抉擇:電信係統是否使用華為?美國人說:“你們必須把它移除,否則我們將不再向你們提供,關鍵技術。”英國政府照做了。結果,我們擁有了一個效率較低的電信係統。

大學正在被告知中國學生這是一個問題,你知道安全問題,呃,你讀過關於間諜醜聞,英國政府必須決定中國朋友是敵人,情況更複雜,但我們被置於必須做出選擇的境地危險機會也存在,就留給你思考一下,很多商業機會,與公司合作,呃綠色公司。當我回到中國幾周前,我去了深圳一個巨大的加油站,我的老朋友殼牌公司及其標誌。但它並非位於加油站之上,而是位於200個充電樁之上,因為中國的汽車現在幾乎絕大多數都是電動汽車。

因此,綠色商業服務、大學、金融服務,蘊藏著機遇,而不僅僅是威脅。

即使我們決定繞過中國,也有其他國家正在迅速崛起,我們將不得不與之對抗。我們應該把他們視為朋友還是敵人,競爭對手還是威脅?印度可能是下一個全球超級大國。那麽我們該怎麽辦?我們應該如何看待這一切?

我有一個,你知道,簡單的信息。你知道,英國擁有一些強大的優勢。我們在許多方麵仍然是一個偉大的國家,這源於對貿易、投資、偉大思想和人才的開放。如果我們失去了這些並試圖對中國和世界其他國家視而不見,那將不是一個好結果。

謝謝聆聽。

Clash of the Superpowers | Sir Vince Cable | TEDxDurham

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXAt2g43SsI

 TEDx Talks
Dec 22, 2025
For three centuries, the West has dominated global politics, economics, and culture. But that era is ending. As the US retreats from its role as the world’s enforcer, China and India, together representing nearly half the world’s population, are stepping forward. China already rivals America as the world’s largest economy, and India could surpass America by 2050.
 
What does this seismic shift mean for global commerce, international law, and the fight against climate change? Drawing on decades of experience as both economist and senior government minister, Vince Cable offers an insider’s account of the forces reshaping our world and what the future looks like when power tilts East. Sir Vince Cable is best known for his tenure as Leader of the Liberal Democrats and as Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills during the coalition government. As the former Chief Economist for Shell plc, he is renowned for his sharp economic insight and is credited as one of the earliest prominent voices forewarning the 2008 financial crisis.
 
Presently Vince is a Visiting Professor at the LSE and remains a prolific writer. His latest book is Eclipsing the West: China, India & the Forging of a New World published by Manchester University Press in Autumn 2025. Previous books include The Storm (2009), After the Storm (2015), Open Arms (2017), Money and Power (2021) and The Chinese Conundrum (2022). This talk was given at a TEDx event using the TED conference format but independently organized by a local community. Learn more at https://www.ted.com/tedx
I'm going to talk about something I've felt passionately interested in for a very long time. What it is that makes countries grow, turns them from poor countries to rich countries. And China has always been a sort of classic case study of how this happens. Uh I first got involved in China. I worked for Shell, the international oil company before I become an MP and I was their chief economist. And they sent me to China around about 30 years ago. And China was just emerging from a period of madness and the Mount Siong. You may remember the great cultural revolution, the chaos and before that the great famine that may have killed 20 30 million people. uh and a remarkable man took over, Dongcha Ping, who embarked on a project trying to turn China into a mixture of communism and capitalism. And it worked.
 
And this suddenly after centuries of stagnation, China sprung back to life. Um rapid growth, hundreds of million people lived out of poverty. Deserves to be
recognized as one of the great figures of the last century. But I was sent there to make a judgment. you know should shall invest large amounts of money in the country and they did. Uh I then went into politics and in the coalition government I was sent back to China to talk to the Chinese about British business and then since I left politics I've tried to study it more detail. I've just come back from a period in China talking to Chinese students visiting Buddhist monasteries, artists trying to get a better understanding of the country. But what has unfortunately happened is that what was seen initially as a kind of win-win collaborative relationship has turned very sour. Now this is not Jurassic Park, but it's um a picture from a hotel room in Korea last week uh where the two most powerful men in the world met to talk about a growing set of problems so-called decoupling. China and and the United States were woven together. You know, things like Apple computers, Tesla cars, two economies linked together now
uncoupling certainly after COVID. uh the chip war where America's withdrawing key technologies from China, retaliation through tariffs, uh China responding by
withholding vital rare metals, um arguments about you know cyber warfare,
um competition in the you know melting waters of the Arctic, undersea cables
which carry the world's internet, dangers of sabotage and espionage, pies. Well, we've had this in the UK and of course Taiwan, which isn't just about politics. Taiwan happens to have the factory, the so-called foundry where the most sophisticated semiconductors or chips in the world happen to be made. Now, it isn't just about China and India. I think we do need to understand what lies behind it.
 
Some of the trends. I'm sorry about, you know, putting a bit of maths here, but
uh the green line is very important. And it's been what's happening over the last
generation. Go back to 1919.
 
Uh the world's poorer countries, emerging economies, Asia, Africa, Latin America, growing from about 40% of the world economy to about 60. And the United States and Europe uh and Japan, the purple line declining. So we've had a big transformation taking place.
 
What's been driving this? Well, the red line which is developing Asia and under
it the black line which is mainly China but China and India together.
 
Now that's the past. The past might continue, might not. We, you know, China's got some economic problems, a collapsing property boom. Uh, America may have a new beast of life from the AI revolution. We see some remarkable things happening there, certainly on the stock market. But the greater likelihood is that something like this happens.
 
I've just taken here a kind of standard forecast from the rich man's club, the OECD, about the what the world could look like in 25 years time looking at sensible projections. And you see that China by then has an economy which is
twice as big as the United States, which is not, you know, shocking really. I mean, China has four times as many people and they're now a very sophisticated country. So, why not? What is really surprising is India, which is now following the Chinese path. Very, very rapid economic growth, catching up very fast. But the story I want to talk about is about India. Also, Indonesia, potentially the fourth biggest economy in the world. It's just overtaken the UK actually in terms of its economic size.
 
But I just want to talk about China andthe United States and the big confrontation which is probably the dominant fact of our lifetime actually and it's taking place on several levels but it's not just about economics. Um this is you know the future of the planet emissions of greenhouse gases and global warming and you see if you look down the middle column you know the United States like like us developed country produces more greenhouse gases per head that's our lifestyle we drive cars and so on. Uh but the biggest emissions in the world by a very long way come from China because of China's modernization.
 
Uh and if the issue of global warming, climate is going to be dealt with, it will be dealt with primarily by the Chinese. You know, if they cooperate or whether they don't, you know, we share the same planet. We have to work with them. And they're the biggest problem, but they also have the solution. They have the technology far more advanced than than we do. So, how is this competition between the West and China or particularly the United States and China bearing out? Well, in one key respect, the Chinese have won hands down already. They do dominate world manufacturing trade, twice as big as the United States almost. Um, and I've just come back from China. You go on these trains going at 200 miles an hour through the industrial heartland in the southeast of China.
 
And you're struck in the way I suppose visitors to Tinside or Manchester would
have been in the middle of the 19th century. just aruck by, you know, mile after mile after mile of factories enormous development taking place. And it's highly sophisticated. It's no  longer just clothes and and toys. It's advanced manufacturing done at a higher level of competence and sophistication than anybody else in the world is now doing. So that's a battle the Chinese have won. Uh and Trump has responded by putting up tariffs. this if you want an explanation of why we have MAGA and Trump it's the previous slide you know
they lost their manufacturing the anger the frustration uh and this is the Trump
retaliation and you see tariffs steadily fell in America since the civil war with a couple of interruptions one in Trump's hero a man called McKinley who was assassinated uh and in the inter war period when American tariffs led to deepen the world depression that we all suffered from.
 
But since then, since Roosevelt, America opening up to the world, cutting its tariffs until Trump and the reversal of course and we don't know where it's going to lead, but it's it's a complete change of course are turning inward. But on manufacturing, the Chinese have clearly won. Technology is a bit more difficult to
call. Um there's competition with China across the whole range of modern technologies. An Australian study a few weeks ago suggested it's out of about 30
50 core technologies the Chinese probably lead on about 30 of them. but just in a quick skim on the left the chips the the microchips were the foundation of all new um airbased technology. The Americans were well ahead. Um, and they also have access to the Taiwanese foundry that makes these things. Uh, but people have been shocked by the extent to which over the last two or three years the Chinese have caught up, throw vast amounts of money at it and appear to be catching up. And the evidence for it is the second column, artificial intelligence. Again, we
assume that the big American tech companies had this pretty much uh under
control. You probably most of you use chatg.
 
Uh then to everybody's astonishment six months ago the Chinese produced deepseek uh which has comparable power and they did it really by workarounds. They couldn't get access to the big chips. So they they clever innovation found other ways of doing it and they've produced two or three uh advanced learning models since then. Just pick up a few of the others. green energy, wind, um solar, um Chinese well ahead in terms of technological development and stupidly the Americans have turned their back on this technology that will we will need for the rest of the century. 
 
even nuclear power about 3/4 of the reactors in the world are now that are being built to Chinese and the other area where the Chinese are clearly ahead is telecoms. Huawei. There's a story there in relation to the UK I'll come back to. Um and some others even a field like quantum physics. I mean my I'm interested in it because my son is a quantum physicist in in Silicon Valley and 20 years ago nobody used to bother to read Chinese articles on this subject. It was so backward and now they're roughly on a par. And we see this right across the board. But but so far, you know, technologically, you've
got a 50/50 head-to-head competition.
There's one respect in which the
Americans are very clearly ahead. They
have a a dominant currency. People, you
know, use dollars. Business uses
dollars. It's safe, convenient, we trust
it until Trump. Um but gradually over
the years, this is even before Trump, um
countries gradually shifting away from
the use of the dollar in transactions. A
lot of some of them were scared when
they saw the use of uh sanctions against
Russia which gave because the Americans
had a chokeold over the currency system.
uh and so there is a process which is
now accelerating and moving away from
the one area where the United States has
an undoubted lead on on on the Chinese
which is control of the world currency
and its reserves. So where is all this
going to lead? Um don't be too baffled
by this but this is a a technique I
developed with my colleagues when I was
in Shell to try and think about the
future. How do you think about the
future 25 years ahead? There's no point
trying to predict. There's so many
uncertain things happening. So the best
way to do it is to tell stories which
are logical, coherent. Um they may or
may not be true, but they they have they
give us a a picture that we can try and
keep in our minds and think about and
challenge. And one of them is that after
this uh tech war, the decoupling, the
Ukraine war that's been taking place,
the world falls into the pattern which
Biden was beginning to develop of trying
to create a global alliance against the
Chinese, which was Europe and the United
States with India, crucially India, as a
security ally. That's the so-called
quad. it is an alliance, Japan, the
United States, uh uh Japan and
Australia. Uh and that's possible. Um
but if if it what ever was a story, uh
Trump has put a big boot on it by
turning on his own allies and the very
capricious approach to trade, it it may
anyway overestimate the power of the
West as as I showed earlier is declining
economically. So you've got another
story which is coming out of the
so-called bricks group which is this
powerful countries from the so-called
global south not just China uh but
Brazil, South Africa, Nigeria, Saudi
Arabia and others uh in which the world
becomes kind of multipolar. You no
longer have just one superpower. You
have America in the Americas, Russia in
Eastern Europe, uh Saudi Arabia in the
Gulf, China in East Asia. Uh and that's
a sort of plausible way that the world
could evolve, but it's also a very
dangerous one because nobody's
responsible then for the big things we
all share in common. You know, climate,
fighting pandemics, dealing with
economic catastrophes like we had in
2008.
And so that leads to another story which
Trump is sort of pushing along which is
that international institutions decay.
you know, the World Trade Organization
no longer functions. Uh the COP on
climate, America isn't going to attend
and you do get a vortex. Nobody's in
charge. You know, the world's systems
gradually fall apart and that could well
lead to disaster and out of disaster the
system could be reborn. I like to have
an optimistic end to all of this, but
you know, these are different ways that
the future can evolve. So let me just
conclude with a few takeaways for you.
Um why should you care about all this?
Does it matter? Well, it it does because
we as a country often as individuals are
now being asked to choose. When I was in
government a big choice, do we use
Huawei in the telecommunication system?
The Americans said, "You have to rip it
out otherwise we will no longer supply
you with key technologies." And the
British government complied. uh we have
a less efficient telecommunication
system as a result. Universities are
being told Chinese students it's a
problem you know security uh you read
about the spy scandal British government
must decide the Chinese friends are
enemies it's more complicated but we're
being put in a position where we have to
choose dangerous
there are opportunities just leave you
with that thought a lot of business
opportunities working with companies uh
green companies when I went back to
China a few weeks ago I went into this
enormous refueling center in Shenzen, my
old company Shell and its logo. But it
wasn't above petrol pumps. It was above
200 charging points because China's cars
are now almost overwhelmingly electric.
So green business services,
universities, financial services, there
are opportunities, not just threats. And
even if we decide to bypass the Chinese,
there are other countries coming up very
fast that we will have to confront. Do
we regard them as friends or enemies,
competition, threat? Uh India probably
the next next in line to be a global
superpower.
So what do we do? How should we think
about all this? And I have one, you
know, simple message. You know, Britain
has some great strengths. We many ways
still a great country and it comes from
openness to trade, investment, big
ideas, people. Uh and if we lose that
and we try to hide from the Chinese and
the rest of the world, that's not a good
outcome. But thank you for listening.
[ 打印 ]
閱讀 ( )評論
評論
目前還沒有任何評論
登錄後才可評論.