2017 (112)
2018 (153)
2019 (199)
2020 (147)
2021 (199)
2022 (166)
2023 (96)
去年由民主黨背後操盤，黑人充當炮灰的殃及全美國的打砸搶燒的黑命貴運動，導致美國警察隊伍被妖魔化，Law and Order變成了白人至上的代名詞。結果可想而知，拜登的民主黨政府上台後，美國的犯罪率飆升，而一向遵紀守法逆來順受的華裔與亞裔，更成了黑命貴搶劫與殺戮的對象。。。
在加州一手遮天的民主黨政客們，為了黑穆西的選票，為了討好黑穆西，更是變本加厲，悍然推出47號提案，簡直是到了喪心病狂的地步！
這個最近鬧得沸沸揚揚，在加州華人中激起公糞的47 號提案，用一句話概括，就是：
搶劫偷盜$950以下，不用蹲監獄
加州的犯罪分子們可謂喜大普奔，而普通老百姓則惶惶不可終日。最可憐的，當屬small business owners。一方麵，遇受疫情的沉重打擊，成千上萬的小商店小企業紛紛倒閉。另一方麵，那些在疫情打擊下勉強存活，拚命維持生計的小企業主小店主們，還要遭受不做不死的民主黨政客的雙重打擊：47號提案！這個提案給了黑穆西光天化日之下隨意偷盜搶劫的自由。隻要金額不超過$950，就不用蹲監獄。換句話說，既使被抓獲，也會立馬釋放。
加州被逼得走投無路的小店主，隻能把店裏每一個商品的價格都定為$951…
一人一票的民主政治被權欲熏心的民主黨玩兒成這屌樣，美國的悲哀啊
做為美國華人，希望大家能夠花上一分鍾。。。。
sign this petition to STOP prop 47 !!!!
TO: The California State House, The California State Senate, and Governor Gavin Newsom
REPEAL PROP 47
https://sign.moveon.org/petitions/repeal-prop-47-1?share=5b30e768-d7ae-4cd7-9e4c-8f94ee20b504&source=email-share-button&utm_medium=&utm_source=email
(1): 在加州，偷盜$950以下是有刑期的 （up to six months in county jail）: 在黑命貴運動的淫威下，有刑期有用嗎？黑穆西犯法，敢抓嗎？即使抓了，還不是立馬放出來
(2): Prop 47 2014年通過時，在民主黨共和黨都有人支持的：2014年的時候，美國的種族矛盾有這麽嚴重嗎？歐巴馬的族裔政治，是美國現在如此撕裂的元凶
(3): 加州的財產犯罪從Prop 47 在2014年通過以來一直是下降的。（比起2000年來，下降了32%）：奉勸您去查一查黑命貴運動之後的犯罪率，看看是增加了，還是減少了。
俺引用的是數據，是專業機構（不止一個）研究調查了整體性，宏觀的大局 － 加州全州長期性的驅勢 － 得到的結果。
您引用的是一個人在網路 Moveon.org 上貼的她自己＂感覺＂，沒有嚴謹的數字或政策分析。隻是片麵的，個人性的，道聽途說的宣稱。這個＂宣稱＂和＂現實＂（reality) 有著很大的距離。
俺還是要再說一次：
(1): 在加州，偷盜$950以下是有刑期的 （up to six months in county jail）。
(2): Prop 47 2014年通過時，在民主黨共和黨都有人支持的。
(3): 加州的財產犯罪從Prop 47 在2014年通過以來一直是下降的。（比起2000年來，下降了32%）。
還有一點：
美國的中文網上到處是謠言假消息，很多四處散播的＂據說＂＂有人說＂在沒有確切的核實前不可輕信。
但是這個輕罪並不輕，每個區段都有相應的懲罰標準
所以最關鍵的執法，加州這個輕罪也有上限到六個月的懲罰
但是加州的實際情況是，抓了就放，所以問題的實質是加州的檢察機關
不予以起訴，警察也就抓了就放了。
“五個海盜如何分享100個金幣？一號海盜給自己留下97個，給2號0個，給3號1個，給四號或五號2個。
海盜分金的這個故事，其實就是人類曆史上不斷重演的階層利益分配的寓言。在人類曆史上，一個有趣的現象是：階層矛盾的爆發形式，往往不是上層和下層之間的簡單二元對立，而是最上層與最下層會合起夥來，與中層對抗。
美國民主黨在歐巴馬之後開始玩所謂“身份政治”。而“身份政治”的思路就是要給每個族群都貼上標簽：你是非洲裔、你是墨裔、你是亞裔、你是女權、你是LGBT……最後給這些代表組一個大聯盟。說我們要平權啊，要反歧視啊。壟斷巨頭和“精英”控製的主流媒體天天喊。
而所有這一切安排的最終目的，是為了壟斷巨頭和被他們所操弄的政客們能夠扮演那個“一號海盜”：為了這場“民主”的投票能通過，他們獻祭了一部分人，安撫了另一部分人，而後就可以心安理得的拿走幾乎所有金幣了。
美國的種族問題，不是種族問題，而是社會階層問題。所謂“種族平權””身份政治“，其實不過是一場被包裝美化了的海盜分金計劃。是美國上層煽動的，一群人對另一群人的合法搶劫。”
Police officers are arresting the same individuals over and over again since they are able to generally get back on the street the same night for drug offenses and property crimes under $950. Criminals using dangerous drugs such as methamphetamines and heroin now face little or no repercussions from law enforcement officers. Unfortunately these same criminals that use drugs and commit "petty theft" crimes are the same criminals that commit violent acts and home burglaries.
It's no coincidence that since the passing of passing of AB109 and Prop 47 almost all of the LAPD's 21 divisions have seen an increase in "Part 1" crimes. Shootings alone have increased by a whopping 30% citywide. And I would bet that these career criminals are the reason behind a 300% increase in petty theft in the City of Rancho Palos Verdes alone.
This was posted by a LAPD Senior Lead Officer who patrols skid row:
Prop 47... I hate to say I told you so but:
Over the last several years I have witnessed so much irresponsibility from people we seek leadership from. We have chosen idealism over our safety. We have chosen to be test subjects in social experiments over common sense.
We fall for titles at the ballot box, instead of weighing the realities of human nature.
For example. Prop 47 was dubbed the "Safe neighborhoods and schools act". Put that on any ballot and most people will vote for it without thinking.
But can anyone tell me how releasing inmates who could care less about your safety or property with no jobs, and no real mandate to get rehabilitated into the streets is supposed to make neighborhoods and schools safe?
The measure did exactly what I thought it would. Put neighborhoods and schools in these neighborhoods in danger. Crime is up all over this state.
Here is the thing. I would have voted for 47 if the mechanisms were in place when they got out to house, employ, and educate them. Instead and as always, they released them first and said "Oh we will fix it later".
I actually agree with making mere possession a misdemeanor, but a misdemeanor with some teeth at least. But I am seeing drug dealers qualifying for 47, as courts are finding loopholes to help get felony drug sales charges reduced.
There is zero incentive now for addicts or dealers to stop their crimes or seek help. Drug usage and dealing are not victimless crimes as the people who created the laws would have you believe.
Dysfunctional users will resort to violence and property crimes to support their habits. Drug dealers use violence as a means to control their operation, protect territories, and intimidate communities from trying to stop them.
This has always been the case, but somehow we still voted for this flawed law as if these criminals would magically stop committing crimes if we released them and just slapped them on the wrist enough times until they get tired of getting their wrist slapped.
Prop 47 and AB109 was not about saving money at all. It was simply a political movement that was packaged in a certain way to get you to vote for it and it worked. It prayed on your heart by using the usual tactics of "saving kids" and "Giving people chances" But what they really have done is place kids and adults in danger to satisfy a world view.
This must be reversed. I'm not against giving people second chances. If you know me, you know that's what I am all about. But with every noble concept, you must use your head and common sense to get it done.
The safety of the people of this state should never be sacrificed or be a part of some idealistic experiment.
I do hope some of the people being released turn their lives around. But based on what I have seen in 20 years of police work, many career criminals won't stop because they chose criminality as a career.
The community within the City of Los Angeles and other communities within California are not going to stand for it. We ask our state legislators to address the repercussions of both of these laws and work with both the community and law enforcement to make modifications necessary to keep criminals off our streets. Reverse the effects of Prop 47 and AB109 now!
（１）： ＂搶劫偷盜$950以下，不用蹲監獄＂
那有這種事情了？$950以下是 misdemeanor 沒錯，可不是無罪。刑期是：up to six months in county jail, 罰款no more than $1,000。
不信的話可以去搶個$949看看，如果被抓本人一概不負責。
（２）：Prop 47 是2014年通過的。那時候是民黨共黨都有支持者。
著名的推手之一，有名的共和黨人士 － 前共和黨國會議長和川粉Newt Gingrich 先生，他當初鼓吹大家投讚成票的文章還在呢！看看：
＂Californians should take advantage of the opportunity and vote yes on Proposition 47.＂
https://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-0917-gingrich-prop--47-criminal-justice-20140917-story.html
（３）： 加州的財產犯罪從Prop 47 在2014年通過以來一直是下降的。
是下降的。
是下降的。
（要說三遍）。
研究顯示：加州在2020年的property crime下降了９%。
比起2000年，整體下降了32%。（全美國也是下降的）
＂California’s 9% drop in the property crime rate in 2020 is just slightly greater than the nationwide decline of 8%. While California’s property crime rate is now significantly below what it was in 2000, down by 32%, this is less than the nationwide drop of about 50%. ＂
（見：https://www.ppic.org/blog/recent-state-crime-trends-mostly-mirror-the-nation/）
還：UC Irvine犯罪學教授研究比較了犯罪數據，發現Proposition 47根本沒有增加犯罪。研究如下：
（見：https://thecrimereport.org/2018/03/09/cas-proposition-47-didnt-cause-crime-rise-study/ ）
我認為根本問題是貧富不均，加上黑人的種族劣性（黑人認為錯都是奴隸製造成的，自己沒有問題，沒錢就去搶，合理的），就造成這今天的局麵。
沒有辦法解決，隻能順其自然，讓局勢更爛一些，這樣加州人才能再次公投，把爛人關在監獄裏麵。 這也意味著高稅收。（警察的費用可不便宜）
因為天氣和社會收入高錢多的因素，全美國的homeless都往加州跑，等於全美國的輕罪可能的罪犯多數在加州。
加州曾經有過美國最嚴厲的針對他們的規定（不許在大街上給他們錢，就是如今這個民主黨州長規定的），但照樣無法阻止他們來加州，你在美國其他什麽地方能找到這種天氣和人們的慷慨？
這個公投其實就是把過去的500美元提高到950美元，但過去鮮有人知道500美元的事情，如今950被炒作到盡人皆知，墨菲定律怎麽說來著？
即使要廢除這個法律，最大可能也隻能采取公投方式，那麽為什麽至今也沒有人發起？難道加州沒有共和黨？這才是值得才探討的。
不是生活在加州的人是理解不了加州的事情的，因為加州與美國任何其他州都不同。而一個曆史現象可以說明這種不同的結局，凡是在加州流行的，不論是事情還是觀念，大致在十五年左右會在全美國流行。
許多州都有1000美元以下的是輕罪的規定，隻是加州把它定為法律了。
------------------
根本區別在於，其他州（如德州）會認真執法。左州不僅定為法律，而且在執行中放任。不抓或者抓了就放。這才是關鍵。