"Of the 64 cases brought by Trump and his supporters, twenty were dismissed before a hearing on the merits, fourteen were voluntarily dismissed by Trump and his supporters before a hearing on the merits, and 30 cases included a hearing on the merits. Only in one Pennsylvania case involving far too few votes to overturn the results did Trump and his supporters prevail."
"But there is absolutely no evidence of fraud in the 2020 Presidential Election on the magnitude necessary to shift the result in any state, let alone the nation as a whole. In fact, there was no fraud that changed the outcome in even a single precinct. It is wrong, and bad for our country, for people to propagate baseless claims that President Biden’s election was not legitimate. "
HenryCharles2022-12-20 10:40:46回複悄悄話
建議閱讀"真的"保守派的研究:
LOST, NOT STOLEN: The Conservative Case that Trump Lost and Biden Won the 2020 Presidential Election
https://lostnotstolen.org/
不客氣並祝聖誕快樂!
就像您提到這個 - 就是一個"假保守派"用話語術來誤導讀者的例子。
首先:FBI不是"獎勵"推特員工,而是他們要推特員工作事 - FBI 需要"補償"推特員工作事的時間。
還有:這件事的時間範圍呢?
是2019年10月 - 到 2021年2月10日。(見:https://nypost.com/2022/12/19/fbi-reimbursed-twitter-for-doing-its-dirty-work-on-users/ )
在這段時間(除了21天外),當總統的是川普。
所以FBI付錢給推特,帳是不是要算在川普上?
您被假保守派的 propaganda 騙了。
被騙太久了。
老實告訴您:您可能是被騙了。
2020年大選沒有重大舞弊 - 個別的 voter fraud是有的,但遠遠沒有到了能改變大選結果的地步。
前述的保守派研究 - 他們研究了:
- 每一個"大選舞弊"的指控
- 川普和其支持者提出"大選舞弊"的64個案子
- 各搖擺州的調查(Arizona,Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsvlvania, Wisconsin),
Arizona州的調查請見第7頁
Georgia州的調查請見第27頁
Michigan州的調查請見第36頁
Nevada州的調查請見第47頁
Pennsvlvania州的調查 請見第53頁
Wisconsin州的調查請見第64頁
他們發現:
"Of the 64 cases brought by Trump and his supporters, twenty were dismissed before a hearing on the merits, fourteen were voluntarily dismissed by Trump and his supporters before a hearing on the merits, and 30 cases included a hearing on the merits. Only in one Pennsylvania case involving far too few votes to overturn the results did Trump and his supporters prevail."
"在川普及其支持者提起的64起案件中,有20起在案情聽證前被駁回,14起案件在案情聽證會前被川普及其支持者自願撤回,30起案件進入案情聽證會[注:這些案子全輸了]。隻有在賓夕法尼亞州的一個案件中川普和他的支持者才獲勝- 但由於牽涉的票數太少而無法推翻大選結果。"
結論是:
"But there is absolutely no evidence of fraud in the 2020 Presidential Election on the magnitude necessary to shift the result in any state, let alone the nation as a whole. In fact, there was no fraud that changed the outcome in even a single precinct. It is wrong, and bad for our country, for people to propagate baseless claims that President Biden’s election was not legitimate. "
"但是在2020 年總統選舉中,絕對沒有能夠改變大選結果的舞弊證據存在 - 不論是在任何一州,更不要說是整個美國了。
事實上,沒有任何舞弊改變了那怕是一個區的結果。人們毫無根據地進行宣傳拜登總統的當選不合法是錯誤的,也是對我們國家不利的。"
川普在2020年輸了七百萬票。那是7,000,000票(還不止)。輸這麽多,不可能是"舞弊"造成的。事實上如果公正不帶偏見的看那年的結果:川普輸是很正常的。他四處數敵,說話常常不算數,三天兩頭開除手下的人(不然就是他們自己辭職),私生活相當可議,言論常有爭議(如:鼓勵民眾注射消毒劑)....等等等等。
在他領導下:2018年期中選舉,眾議院共和黨輸了41席(是共和黨自1974年來最差的成績)。2022年期中,民主黨(隻)輸了9席。2020年總統大選敗選七百萬票。2016年他的對手也贏了他二百八十萬票 - 不過運氣好還是讓他贏了選舉人票。
有沒有人想過:他的選舉成績其實並不怎麽樣?
他本來就不是一個稱職的,能代表保守派的人選。
敗選是非常正常的。和所謂的"舞弊"沒有甚麽關係。
LOST, NOT STOLEN: The Conservative Case that Trump Lost and Biden Won the 2020 Presidential Election
https://lostnotstolen.org/