北大出身的數學金牌教練趙斌公開指控薑萍造假，注意趙斌說薑萍可能連競賽的題目都看不懂。這需要相當的膽量，因為這是將自己的職業信譽都可能賠上的舉動。

現在高達37位阿裏決賽選手實名發表公開信，他們要求阿裏調查薑萍涉嫌競賽造假的事件。首先需要公布薑萍和她的導師王閏秋的考試答卷，然後邀請第三方核實後判斷。

這37位數學界人士列出了三點強有力的證據質疑薑萍，這些都在我最近的幾篇文章中出現過。

首先他們認為薑萍的板書錯誤連篇，她根本不像是位達到如此高水平的數學愛好者。

其次他們引用複旦數學教授的觀點，認為薑萍在競賽中使用了LaTex數學輸入軟件，但是他們進爾推論薑萍根本不具備使用該軟件的能力和條件。

因為熟練使用該軟件需要至少一年的時間，薑萍在接受采訪時說自己競賽時總是在埋頭做題，但是使用LaTex軟件輸入時必須看電腦，根本不可能埋頭做題。況且LateX對錯誤輸入非常敏感，這與薑萍板書錯誤相互矛盾。

從這些特點看，複旦教授認為薑萍超過了95%的數學係學生的水準，該教授隻是罷出了這些事實，讓我們去做判斷。我的判斷是以薑萍的資質和軟件存在的可能性看，薑萍幾乎不可能獨立贏得第12名的佳績。

公開信列舉的第三條是薑萍導師王閏秋可能擁有做假團隊，我看過他們的被爆光的聊天記錄，當時就覺得可信。現在這37名決賽選手更覺得聊天記錄是真的，認為天津大學的田金方（田佬）是直接的嫌疑人。聊天記錄中田佬是田金方，觀佬是王閏秋，如果核實他們的誠信肯定完蛋。

這次數學博主飛哥還公開了他們數學圈裏麵的語音對話記錄，因為誠實的數學選手認為出現做假的薑萍損害了他們的利益。

這個狗血劇似乎與韓寒假作文事件同樣具有戲劇性，唯一不同的是現在資迅更加發達，使薑萍事件更容易反轉。我也佩服中國年輕人的勇氣，正是他們讓我們看到了中國的希望。

公開信的簽名者相當仁慈，他們聲稱為了不幹擾薑萍備考決賽，該信將會在決賽後才公布。

阿裏號稱是全球競賽，公開信也是以中文和英文貼出。讓我們實錄那信，這次阿裏出醜出大了。當然我隻是從這博主裏知道的，不能100%核實其真實性，這年頭在網上真是什麽都有。

下麵是37位阿裏決賽選手的公開信：

2024年6月19日

Date: 06/19/2024

尊敬的2024阿裏巴巴全球數學競賽組委會：

Dear Members of the 2024 Alibaba Global Mathematics Competition Organizing Committee,

我們是入圍2024阿裏巴巴全球數學競賽決賽的部分選手，謹此向各位致以誠摯的問候。首先，我們真誠地感謝組委會和達摩院的工作人員為組織這項傑出的比賽所做出的巨大努力和付出。

We are writing to you as a group of finalists for the 2024 Alibaba Global Mathematics Competition.
First and foremost, we would like to express our sincere appreciation for the tremendous effort and dedication put forth by the committee members and staffs at the Damo Academy in organizing this esteemed competition.

近日，在預賽中獲得第12名並入圍決賽的薑萍同學引起了社會上的廣泛關注和熱烈討論，這其中也不乏相關領域專業人士對她的預賽成績和數學專業水平的質疑。

Recently, there has been a heated discussion regarding one of the finalists, Jiang Ping, who ranked 12th in the Qualifying Round, and concerns have been raised by professionals in the relevant fields on her scores and math competence.

一些主要的質疑如下：

Some of the primary concerns are as follows:

1。在達摩院發布的紀錄視頻中，薑萍同學在黑板上解答一道數學問題時，其板書中出現了明顯的書寫錯誤，如將“2”寫作“之”，將“sin Tz”寫作“sin r™”等等，顯示出她對這些專業數學表達式和符號似乎並不熟悉。
In a documentary video released by the Damo Academy, Jiang Ping made several apparent writing mistakes (e.g., writing "2"" as "2" writing "sin z" as "sin n?") while solving a math problem on the blackboard. It appears that she seemed unfamiliar with these mathematical expressions and symbols.

2。複旦大學數學教授姚一雋在接受采訪時表示，一位曾看過薑萍同學答卷的同行評價她?“LaTex使用熟練”：然而，LaTex 是一種常應用於科技文稿撰寫的排版係統，並非數學學習者所必需掌握的技能：且LaTeX 對數學表達式的輸入錯誤非常敏感，這與她在視須中頻頻出現書寫錯誤似有矛盾。
Math professor Yao Yijun from Fudan University claimed in an interview that, a colleague of him who had seen Jiang Ping's submitted answers commented that Jiang Ping was "skilled in using LaTeX". However, LaTeX is a typesetting system commonly used for writing technical documents, not a skill that mathematics learners necessarily need to master. Furthermore, LaTeX is highly sensitive to errors in math expression inputs, which seems to contradict the frequent writing errors she made in the video. P3

3。有指控聲稱，薑萍同學的數學老師王閏秋（預賽排名第125名）可能和其他人一起協助薑萍同學完成了其預賽答案。
Allegations have been made that Jiang Ping's math teacher, Wang Runqiu, who ranked 125th in the Qualifying Round, may have assisted her in preparing the answers, with potential help from others.

我們認為，包括上述質疑在內，目前網絡上所流傳的一係列所謂“證據”均為間接證據，並不足以證明薑萍同學在預賽中涉及任何不當行為；但是，考慮到這些討論所引發的輿論影響，組委會有義務、也有能力認真對待這些質疑，並采取適當行動澄清事件真相。

We believe that the so-called "evidence" currently circulating on the Internet, including the concerns mentioned above, is too circumstantial to prove that Jiang Ping was involved in any misconduet during the Qualifying Round. However, given the impact on public opinion caused by such discussions, the organizing committee has an obligation, and also the capability, to address these concerns seriously and take appropriate actions to clarify the truth.

有鑒於此，作為同樣入圍決賽的選手，我們懇請組委會采取以下措施：

Therefore, as fellow finalists, we respectfully urge the committee to take the following actions:

1。在獲得薑萍同學和王閏秋老師的許可後，向入圍決賽的選手公開其預賽答卷，以供審閱。
Make public the submitted answers for the Qualifying Round by Jiang Ping and Wang Runqiu for examination, at least among the finalists, upon receiving their permissions.

2。由組委會成員和無利益衝突的第三方專家進行獨立調查，並及時、公開公布調查結果。
Perform an independent investigation by committee members AND third-party experts with no conflicts of interest, and announce the investigation results to the public in a timely manner.

鑒於決賽將於本周六（6月22日）舉行，為避免在賽前給薑萍同學帶來任何不必要的壓力，我們將推遲至決賽結束後再公開這封請願信（及任何答複）。

As the Final Round of the competition is scheduled for this Saturday, June 22nd, to avoid imposing any unnecessary pressures on Jiang Ping in her preparation for the Final Round, we will refrain from revealing this petition letter (and any response from you) to the public until the end of the Final Round.

再次感謝各位為組織這項比賽所做的努力，並期待組委會的及時答複。

Once again, we would like to express our gratitude for your efforts in organizing this competition, and we look forward to your prompt response to address these concerns.

（附件為參與請願的決賽選手名單，按時間順序排列）

(Please find attached the list of finalists joining the petition in chronological order)

轉述完畢，裏麵的數學符號可能因粘貼時發生錯誤，大家以原文為準。