You're 納稅人 - I can see your point and your frustration - that's what I intended to say in the post -
That's true - Science was conducted by elites, who used their own money. Now, science is a job - some scientists don't think much about tax payers' benefit. My point was to hope the public start to 解讀屠呦呦施一公, like science - that's really 中國崛起. Scientists need to take the responsibility to explain to tax payers - Whatever taken will be getting back to tax payers in what way - let the public trust scientists.
In reality, a country like China size, the government should never try to mobilize all to get a Nobel Prize, to do basic research with massive money - it's impossible. Let the nature takes course: If you're Nobel material, you'll pan out regardless. Some leaders don't realize how much power they have - I'd pray for their wisdom to lead the public to a productive journey 中國崛起.
********************** Source of Inspiration ********************************************
屠呦呦施一公解讀納稅人, 納稅人解讀屠呦呦施一公: 這種互動有利科學大環境。If you can't explain your science in plain language, so simple that laymen can understand - you don't know your science at all. You can't live in an ivory tower if you use the money from tax payers - it's your responsibility to get back to those tax payers. Vice versa - you can't complain if as tax payers you don't ask about science.
科學家學會解讀納稅人納稅人解讀科學家, -才是中國崛起, 才不是被牽著鼻子走。
****************** Source of Inspiration*************************
博主回複(2015-10-30 13:07):Science was conducted by elites, who used their own money. Now, science is a job - some science elites don't think much about tax payers' benefit.
博主回複(2015-10-30 13:15):That's true - Science was conducted by elites, who used their own money. Now, science is a job - some scientists don't think much about tax payers' benefit. My point was to hope the public start to 解讀屠呦呦施一公, like science - that's really 中國崛起. Scientists need to take the responsibility to explain to tax payers - Whatever taken will be getting back to tax payers in what way - let the public trust scientists.
博主回複(2015-10-30 13:20):You're 納稅人 - I can see your point. That's true - Science was conducted by elites, who used their own money. Now, science is a job - some scientists don't think much about tax payers' benefit. My point was to hope the public start to 解讀屠呦呦施一公, like science - that's really 中國崛起. Scientists need to take the responsibility to explain to tax payers - Whatever taken will be getting back to tax payers in what way - let the public trust scientists.
博主回複(2015-10-30 13:10):Sorry. Can you make it better? Here is my clarification: Science was conducted by elites, who used their own money. Now, science is a job - some scientists don't think much about tax payers' benefit. My point was to hope the public start to 解讀屠呦呦施一公, like science - that's really 中國崛起.
博主回複(2015-10-30 13:21):You're 納稅人 - I can see your point and your frustration - that's what I intended to say in the post -
That's true - Science was conducted by elites, who used their own money. Now, science is a job - some scientists don't think much about tax payers' benefit. My point was to hope the public start to 解讀屠呦呦施一公, like science - that's really 中國崛起. Scientists need to take the responsibility to explain to tax payers - Whatever taken will be getting back to tax payers in what way - let the public trust scientists.
博主回複(2015-10-30 13:18):"納稅人是什麽人?可不像投資人那麽好定義。在我看來不是普通百姓." That's quite bizzar - anyone who pays tax is 納稅人 (including sale tax) -
That's true - Science was conducted by elites, who used their own money. Now, science is a job - some scientists don't think much about tax payers' benefit. My point was to hope the public start to 解讀屠呦呦施一公, like science - that's really 中國崛起. Scientists need to take the responsibility to explain to tax payers - Whatever taken will be getting back to tax payers in what way - let the public trust scientists.
博主回複(2015-10-30 13:24):科學家也是納稅人! That's true, but how much tax a scientist pay? How much a scientist use? That proportion takes the obligation! If a scientist use more than he pays - that carry the obligation!
You're 納稅人 - I can see your point and your frustration - that's what I intended to say in the post -
That's true - Science was conducted by elites, who used their own money. Now, science is a job - some scientists don't think much about tax payers' benefit. My point was to hope the public start to 解讀屠呦呦施一公, like science - that's really 中國崛起. Scientists need to take the responsibility to explain to tax payers - Whatever taken will be getting back to tax payers in what way - let the public trust scientists.
博主回複(2015-10-30 13:26):That's true, but how much tax does a scientist pay? How much does a scientist use? That proportion takes the obligation! If a scientist uses more than he pays - carrying the obligation!
You're 納稅人 - I can see your point and your frustration - that's what I intended to say in the post -
That's true - Science was conducted by elites, who used their own money. Now, science is a job - some scientists don't think much about tax payers' benefit. My point was to hope the public start to 解讀屠呦呦施一公, like science - that's really 中國崛起. Scientists need to take the responsibility to explain to tax payers - Whatever taken will be getting back to tax payers in what way - let the public trust scientists.
博主回複(2015-10-30 13:12):That's true - Science was conducted by elites, who used their own money. Now, science is a job - some scientists don't think much about tax payers' benefit. My point was to hope the public start to 解讀屠呦呦施一公, like science - that's really 中國崛起.
博主回複(2015-10-30 13:12):That's true - Science was conducted by elites, who used their own money. Now, science is a job - some scientists don't think much about tax payers' benefit. My point was to hope the public start to 解讀屠呦呦施一公, like science - that's really 中國崛起.
博主回複(2015-10-30 13:26):You're 納稅人 - I can see your point and your frustration - that's what I intended to say in the post -
That's true - Science was conducted by elites, who used their own money. Now, science is a job - some scientists don't think much about tax payers' benefit. My point was to hope the public start to 解讀屠呦呦施一公, like science - that's really 中國崛起. Scientists need to take the responsibility to explain to tax payers - Whatever taken will be getting back to tax payers in what way - let the public trust scientists.
博主回複(2015-10-30 13:33):You're sharp! Well said! You got my point! 羊群效應理論(The Effect of Sheep Flock),也稱羊群行為(Herd Behavior)羊群心理 herd instinct: 從眾效應或樂隊花車效應(Bandwagon effect)是指人們受到多數人一致性思想或行動的影響,而跟從大眾的思想或行為,常被稱為「羊群效應」。 也稱“跟風效應”,英文中將其描述為:TheGreater-fool-Game,意為“下家都是比你更大的傻瓜”。“羊群效應”也叫“從眾效應”:是個人的觀念或行為由於真實的或想像的群體的影響或壓力,而向與多數人相一致的方向變化的現象。表現為對特定的或臨時的情境中的優勢觀念和行為方式的采納(隨潮)表現為對長期性的占優勢地位的觀念和行為方式的接受(順應風俗習慣)。人們會追隨大眾所同意的,將自己的意見默認否定,且不會主觀上思考事件的意義. 羊群是一種很散亂的組織,平時在一起也是盲目地左衝右撞,但一旦有一隻頭羊動起來,其他的羊也會不假思索地一哄而上,全然不顧前麵可能有狼或者不遠處有更好的草。因此,“羊群效應”就是比喻人都有一種從眾心理,從眾心理很容易導致盲從,而盲從往往會陷入騙局或遭到失敗。
You're 納稅人 - I can see your point and your frustration - that's what I intended to say in the post -
That's true - Science was conducted by elites, who used their own money. Now, science is a job - some scientists don't think much about tax payers' benefit. My point was to hope the public start to 解讀屠呦呦施一公, like science - that's really 中國崛起. Scientists need to take the responsibility to explain to tax payers - Whatever taken will be getting back to tax payers in what way - let the public trust scientists.
博主回複(2015-10-30 13:11):That's true - Science was conducted by elites, who used their own money. Now, science is a job - some scientists don't think much about tax payers' benefit. My point was to hope the public start to 解讀屠呦呦施一公, like science - that's really 中國崛起.