嗯。

來源: pieq314 於 2012-03-02 15:11:34 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀： 次 (445 bytes)
回答: 你列的這些鏡頭我都有 由 雲漫 於 2012-03-02 15:03:03

My 70-200 f/2.8 IS (original) is not very sharp (well, it is not bad, more than enough for my purpose, comparable to sample photos on the Internet, so I do not think it is a bad copy) when compared to 500mm f/4 at f/4 or Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 at f/2.8.

So your 70-200 f/2.8 II should be better (my memory was from the original version.  If 70-200 f/4 II comes out, I would expect it to be sharper than 70-200 f/2.8 II at f/2.8.

所有跟帖： 

• 回複：嗯。 -雲漫- ♂ 給 雲漫 發送悄悄話 雲漫 的博客首頁 (172 bytes) () 03/02/2012 postreply 15:21:17

請您先登陸，再發跟帖！

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”