case 1 again:

來源: HF: 2009-01-03 20:47:08 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (326 bytes)

Without loss of generality, we may assump x<=y<=z=M

case 1. x < y, then both Y1= intsec(Y,(x,M]) and Z1=(Z,(z,M]) are non-empty, and (x,M] = union(Y1,Z1)
so, for any x1 in X, we can find y1 in Y1 and z1 in Z1, such that |y1-z1| < x1, and by construction, y1 >= x1, z1 >= x1, so x1,y1,z1 can form a triangle.
請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”