擁槍權不是憲法“賦予”的,憲法隻是說擁槍權不得被侵犯。

來源: hippo_giant 2020-01-24 07:47:40 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (642 bytes)

The right there specified is that of "bearing arms for a lawful purpose." This is not a right granted by the Constitution. Neither is it in any manner dependent upon that instrument for its existence. The second amendment declares that it shall not be infringed, but this, as has been seen, means no more than that it shall not be infringed by Congress. - US v. Cruikshank

1876 年聯邦最高法院在 US v. Cruikshank 一案的判詞裏說,合法持槍的權利不是憲法賦予的,也絕不依靠憲法而存在。

加跟帖:

  • 標題:
  • 內容(可選項): [所見即所得|預覽模式] [HTML源代碼] [如何上傳圖片] [怎樣發視頻] [如何貼音樂]