這個Cut是因為保留老橋，去掉新橋的人行道和自行車道，

In 2019, the Maryland Transportation Authority instead voted to approve a $463 million dollar contract that did not have state funding for the bike and pedestrian paths.

The MTA said it offered to turn the old bridge over to Charles County, "but county officials declined the offer."

The advocates suing now say they believe the change of plans, while approved by the MTA, did not meet the rigorous environmental and transportation impact studies required. They argue since those studies were not done to the same extent as the original project, the old bridge should be kept and turned into a pedestrian and cycling bridge.

"It’s clear from our perspective that Maryland did not do the environmental homework and the studies that they needed to do to make this change by eliminating the bicycle and pedestrian paths, rights of ways on the new Nice Bridge," Brinkley said.

所有跟帖： 

• 隻減人行道和自行車道，也不可能節省那麽多造價；至少這座橋沒爾等所說的一再追加造價和延長工期。 -法眼- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/02/2024 postreply 14:55:38

• 這個是， -胡雪鹽8- ♂ (47 bytes) () 05/02/2024 postreply 14:57:49

• 這個河道也不淺，與巴爾地摩這座橋的水深相差無幾了。 -法眼- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/02/2024 postreply 15:06:31

• 同時，我可以告訴你，老橋demolished；而且，老橋主橋墩的水下部分都demolished了。 -法眼- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/02/2024 postreply 16:34:55