but that's just my opinion. :)
I know where this sort of argument comes from. but imo Bilski are more relevant to some really odd ball mental process related patents rather than software. Take a look at Bilski itself you will know what I mean. there are many scholars trying to make a huge fuss on this issue. I think that is because you don't get that many new decision on patents so it is a big deal for them. but in reality, i am not sure the impact will be that significant.
so don't start hyper-ventilating yet. talk to a patent attorney, and ask what they think.
I serious doubt this will happen
所有跟帖:
•
Gene Quinn says otherwise
-apt-
♂
(803 bytes)
()
04/27/2009 postreply
19:11:02
•
這隻是他一個人的想法而已,
-caliber-
♂
(325 bytes)
()
04/27/2009 postreply
23:36:45