I serious doubt this will happen

回答: patentablity of software in general,caliber2009-04-27 15:24:49

but that's just my opinion. :)

I know where this sort of argument comes from. but imo Bilski are more relevant to some really odd ball mental process related patents rather than software. Take a look at Bilski itself you will know what I mean. there are many scholars trying to make a huge fuss on this issue. I think that is because you don't get that many new decision on patents so it is a big deal for them. but in reality, i am not sure the impact will be that significant.

so don't start hyper-ventilating yet. talk to a patent attorney, and ask what they think.

所有跟帖: 

Gene Quinn says otherwise -apt- 給 apt 發送悄悄話 (803 bytes) () 04/27/2009 postreply 19:11:02

這隻是他一個人的想法而已, -caliber- 給 caliber 發送悄悄話 caliber 的博客首頁 (325 bytes) () 04/27/2009 postreply 23:36:45

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!