回複:提上來問--關於counter claim,wxc2008和老貓請進:

來源: apt 2007-09-25 10:05:14 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (854 bytes)
You did not say whether this is a claim in state court of federal court. In federal courts, most of the state courts procedures follow the federal rule of civil procedure anyway, no suprises are allowed.

If you don't answer, everything in the counterclaim is presumed admitted. Depends on the jurisdiction, you can deny in the answer but don't have to list the reason for denial. However, once you deny, the attorney of the other party should have been alerted to ask you why. Under federal rule, anything related to the claim or defense is discoverable so that you can not hide, unless the information is privileged or a defense theory, not related to any facts. Even if you can hide the information until the trial, once the attorney of the party hears this he will object and the court will strike it because it is prejudicial to them.

所有跟帖: 

謝謝你!我明天就去answer! -第一次打官司- 給 第一次打官司 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/25/2007 postreply 17:17:02

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”