回複:回複:有關朋友借錢不還的事

來源: bm 2004-12-29 10:34:31 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (773 bytes)
回答: 有關朋友借錢不還的事xiexie大家2004-12-27 20:18:58
Great discussion by wal-mart. Unjust enrichment is a good argument for this case. The shear amount and the duration of the payment is enough to show that the money was not paid gratuitously. You are just friends, not related family members. Friends usually don't give a lot of money without the expectation that it would be repaid. I presume you are not benefitted in anyway by the payment of the money.
Did your friend give you back anything in return? Did he in any communication with you indicated that he acknowledged that he owed you the debt, but just refused to repay? If you can provide any of these, it would help your argument.

On a second point, the amount of money may have exceeded the upper limit a small claims court can award.

Good luck.

所有跟帖: 

回複:回複:回複:有關朋友借錢不還的事 -xiexiedj- 給 xiexiedj 發送悄悄話 (63 bytes) () 12/29/2004 postreply 20:27:29

It's contract law. -bm- 給 bm 發送悄悄話 (29 bytes) () 12/30/2004 postreply 09:06:54

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”